"I Have To Side With The Majority"

BY The Sweet Science ON June 14, 2012
PDFPrintE-mail

"You always find what you're looking for. When people take sides, they always see what they want to see. This explains how the brain works. When Michael rewatched it with the clear purpose of seeing it through the judges eyes, he actually changed his mental channel and his brain responded by tuning in only to scenes that were in Bradley's favor, almost disregarding the rest. But does that make Mr Woods' analysis right this time? Boxing scoring is subjective hence unreliable no matter the credentials of the officials. Add to it the different angles from which each judge view a fight. Having seen replays 2x myself, I guess I have to side with the majority. Even known Pac-haters like Floyd Sr, Teddy Atlas, ODLH, nemesis Marquez, Paul Magno, FightHype writers all agreed it was an 11-1 to 8-4 win range for Pacquiao and never any closer." --TSS reader Rude M has watched the fight two times, sees same result

Latest Articles

liverpoolsbomberlookingforcruiserweightgreencomesunday
herbqherbiehoopslambeck19322015boxingspeerlesspricemaker
stopcryingaboutcanelonotfightinggolovkindosomethingaboutit
insidestraightthebodypunchers
sugarshanemosleyisbackinactiononmay28inthefinalhurdletoanotherworldtitlefight
eyeontheheavyweightsbritdavidpricereturnssunday
hayevsbriggswwewithboxinggloves
britainsconundrumhowtosolveaproblemliketysonfury
abigupsetinthefeaturedboutsealsawildknockoutnightatthed
cruiserweightdenislebedevcomesupbigasthehometeamdrubstheoutsidersinmoscow

Latest Videos on BoxingChannel.tv


The Talk N Shoot Boxing Podcast - 10th Edition - The Super Welterweiight Discussion (May 25)


Live Boxing Coverage
IBOFP

Do you think Alvarez vs Golovkin will fight in 2016?

74.2%   (46)
25.8%   (16)
Loading...