Do We Need A New Weight Class In Boxing? |
|
|
|
| Written by Kelsey McCarson | |||
| Thursday, 20 September 2012 18:46 | |||
|
Imagine my surprise when I stumbled upon an article over at Russia Times today claiming the WBC was working with other sanctioning organizations, specifically the WBO and IBF, on creating a new weight class division for fighters in-between the 200 pound cruiserweight limit and heavyweight (unlimited). “There are some fighters who are somewhere in between the cruiserweight and heavyweight classes. So the WBC, WBO and IBF are negotiating over establishing a new weight category, and it could help that kind of fighter bring out their full potential,” said Mikhail Denisov, WBC Vice President. Weight classes have more than doubled since the original eight divisions of the early 1900s (fly, bantam, feather, light, welter, middle, light heavy and heavy) were expanded to seventeen in 1979 by (you guessed it) the WBC. Taken in context, Denisov appears in the video to be talking about how his organization can help build up Russian fighters to a point where their careers match those of some of their more renowned international counterparts. Still, his nonchalant discussion of the matter through a media outlet leads me to believe the negotiations for yet another weight class may be a very real possibility. Fight fans often seem frustrated over the amount of title belts and divisions in the sport already, so I wonder how well received something like this could possibly be. I’ve reached out to the WBC, WBA and WBO to see if they can offer further comment. Follow Kelsey on twitter @TheRealKelseyMc and check out his latest YouTube talk on Pacquiao-Marquez 3 & 4 here. ali says:
I agree with u amayseng heavyweight nowadays are so much bigger then they where back in the day. Also i worry about the safety of a fighter fighting someone so much bigger. Eddie Chambers weighted what 205 against and Wlad weighed about 245 that like welterweight fighting a cruiserweight it just too big of a gap for professional fighters to be fighting. brownsugar says:
There already is a new weight class and it's called "Catch weight" Radam G says:
WTF! No! No! Do we need bigger animals? The dinosaurs' big sorry arses couldn't stand the heat of the world's kitchen, so they got da double fudge extinct. In natural selection, homo sapiens won against the big-@ss Neanderthals -- more proof that little men have always dominated the biggies and tallies. ali says:
Radam how do u think Pac would do against the cruiserweight champion of the world? Radam G says:
Criuserwieight is a phony-a$$ division, FIRST and FOREMOST. Nextly, if it were still the old days of boxing' when all the money was in the heavier divisions, Da Manny would kick much butt. Instead of challengling me, SCLA Ali, you need to do your research. Jack Johnson refused to give a 140 pounder a shot who routinely beat him down before he got the belt from 168-pound Tommy Burns. Holla! Radam G says:
Nobody can sell me the myths about big a$$es and tallies, and the need to have another division of sorry, slow lazy CHUMPS of fat arses and over-tall arses. Holla! SouthPaul says:
Yea, I feel you, and Brownsugar makes a good point with the catchweight. If anything... Remove some. gibola says:
I have always though that the big welters who aren't quite lightmiddles are unfairly treated by having to fight at 154. Don Curry and Milt McCrory only lost to Mike McCallum back in the day because of this anomoly. The seven pounds is far too much of a jump. I propose the Light Light Middle / Super Duper Welterweight division, fighters weighing no more than 151 pounds. We could have Cotto, PBF, Pacman, a comebacking Ricky Hatton.... deepwater says:
We need less weight classes not more. deepwater says:
boxing needs to go back to the olden days of 8 weight classes. same day weigh -ins. too many weight classes,too many champions, too many excuses. rip mickey walker and the rest of the fighters that would fight any man. donputo69 says:
Wut it do my peeps....Shout out to my peeps still holding it down in here....Ya know who ya are.....Anyway....Lets talk boxing....Shall we....I think they should make another weight class....I say 164lbs limit....160-168 is a big difference for boxers to either move up or move down....Holla Back!!! deepwater says:
nice to see ya don. I think 19 weight classes is more then enough. its practically every 3 lbs to 5lbs or so. ali says:
What's good Don? Boxing should only bring one thing from the old days and that's having 1champion for each weight class. But we definitely need more then 8 weight classes and boxing does not need to go back to 15 round fights. We have to remember the heavyweight are so much larger nowadays the Klits, Price, Tyson F, Wilder, we even had a 7 0 300 lbs fighter I know he sucked but still. It only a matter of time that someone is going to be that big but skillful and powerful then people will start asking for a new weight class brownsugar says:
Good to see the one an only DP69 in da house. Wow it just gets better and better. Radam G says:
WRONG, SCLA Ali! Gravity will not allow it. You keep forgetting physics and varies ____ ____ _____! There are certain that a lion can do, but not an elephant. There are certain things that a mouse can do but not a rhino. BIG-ARSE and TALL-ARSE human are limit because of the pull of gravity. And that is just the way that it will always be. Radam G says:
WOW! Even when Superman Roy Jones Jr whupped JL Ruiz, Jones only weighted 193lbs -- not a heavyweight by nowadays standards. Heavyweight is now over 200lbs. And that pseudo-arse criuserweight division is now 176 to 200 pounds. When that fake syet started back in da day, it was [176 to] 188-pound max. WTF! And like I noted, dat ___ ____ has sneaked always the way up to 200 pounds. Pretty soon that sneaky ___ ____ will be 225lbs or more. Holla! Radam G says:
And the heavyweights are not LARGER nowadays. The sorry-arse champions and main contenders ARE, because the big money in every division and the fake-arse cruiserweight division gave big, sorry, lazy, softy giant a safe chance to shine against one another. And that is a fact JACK! Jpjaco says:
I think the bigger fighters are stronger, quicker, and more coordinated than they used to be. Not sure if its modern sports science or evolving genetics, but the tall guys are far more competitive - no dominant than ever before. Is it because all the great heavyweights are trapped in the cruiser weight division? I say no. Name me one cruiser or light heavy weight who is a would be giant killer. I don't know why, but the modern 6'2" 220lb heavyweight doesn't stand much chance against the top big men in the division. it would be interesting to see how some of the past champs would have done inst the likes of Lewis and the K bros. Radam G says:
Jp, I 100 percent disagree wth you. They look swell against each other. Let 'em tangle with the little men, like back in da day, than you will see the obvious. They can run optical illisions and mass confusion on the naive and da know nothings. But they cannot fool Mother Nature or Poppa Reality with an ounce of that automagical bullsyetology. Holla! Radam G says:
BTW! One hundred-and-68-pound Andre "SOG" Ward would fudge up heavies just as 168-pounder Tommy Burns use to do over five scores ago, if there were still no big moola to be made in Ward's present-day made-up weight division of super middleweight. (As far as I'm concern, Burns is literally a P4P great.) Jpjaco says:
Tommy Burns was great, but who did he fight? The average heavyweight back then was 185 to 190. Do you really think Andre Ward, as good as he is, could get inside the Klitchko jab and rough him up? I think it's normal to be skeptical of another weight class and the sanctioning fees that go along with it. I'm with you in that. But when you've got 6'6 250lb guys with fast hands, coordination, power and talent dominating a field of 225 pound guys, I can't see the downside of a 225 weight class. The champ here could always step up and challenge the big men. Radam G says:
Maybe you should holla at Fightfax or Boxrec and see the actuality of the reality. The division was littered with HEAVYWEIGHTS and fatties and tallies during the days of Burns, who fought the best of his era. He ducked nobody. This why Jack Johnson got a shot. Radam G says:
The K-bros/docs are fast against people their size. I suggest that you attend sparring sessions when they are working with middles and light heavies. They aren't fast then. You are apparently fasinated with size and reach. It means little to those in da know. It is just a talking point for talking heads to bamboozle and hoodwink fanfaronades and groupies. Jpjaco says:
No disrespect to Tommy when I said who did he fight. I was referring to the size of the guys he fought, not their talent or credibility. Having said that, some of the defenses were against guys with questionable records. Radam G says:
Large parts of the game's magic has always been WTF are fighters' true records and ages? Da game flows with bull$h*tology and optical illusions like any gang of magicians. Holla! Marlon Estacio Pagtakhan says:
This would be unfair to smaller Heavyweights (or even Cruiserweights) who are questing to become the "Supreme King of the Ring". Ultimately size (including reach) doesn't matter as there are smaller fighters who have just as much punching power as these new bigger fighters. Obviously many who've earned their shots just lack the confidence & skill required to take down their bigger opponents. It is not impossible for a 205lb. fighter to take down the likes of Wladimir Klitschko. Jpjaco says:
I know Tommy was the first and only Canadian born heavyweight champion, that he traveled the world fighting the best, 11 or 13 defenses wih 8 kos and was straight up enough to give Jack a shot, in which Jack played with him for 14 rounds before the police stopped the show. Jpjaco says:
I know Tommy was the first And only Canadian born heavyweight champ, travelled the world defending his title 11 or 13 times depending on how you count them, and was straight up enough to fight Jack Johnson who lifted the title from him. I did check boxrec, confirmed what I thought re size of heavyweight back then. There were a couple of guys over 195.
|




"If they create a new weight class, I volunteer to fight for their title!" (Ed Diller photo, in NYC)





well i do not disagree with it, a fighter at 210 fighting a fighter at 260, doesnt sound fair..
ok Radam, let me have it!!!