Poll Position: How the Fans Voted
|
|
| Do you think Samuel Peter beat James Toney? |
 |
 |
 |
| Yes |
33% (225 votes) |
 |
 |
 |
| No |
67% (465 votes) |
 |
 |
 |
|
What Counts Judging fights is subjective, even without outside interference, so it must be especially hard to judge a fight of major importance with the world looking over your shoulder. On top of that, some people love a boxer, others are a sucker for a slugger, and allow their tastes to determine who won a round or won a fight, rather than allowing the accuracy of punches thrown, the number of punches landed, and intangibles like ring generalship to affect their decision. The judges for Saturday’s WBC heavyweight eliminator scored it 115-112 Toney and 116-111 Peter twice, giving Sam Peter the victory and a shot at newly crowned Oleg Maskaev for the WBC heavyweight title. But when a defiant James Toney said at the end of the bout, “I won that fight. Everyone in the world and the arena knows I won the fight,” many people agreed. What about you? Do you think Samuel Peter beat James Toney? |
|
 |
|
|
|
Witter A Slapper, A Flapper (A Career In The Crapper?)
"Another upset! I keep making the right bet. I never thought for a moment that Witter was a good boxer or a hitter. He is just another slapper and a big-mouth flapper. In the hurt business, no word can hit you like a fist. He got knocked on his butt, and his words didn't cushion his fall. Hopefully, he will now shut up. More of today's boxers should learn the art of hurting, and cut out all this garbage of hyping. All the sightings of "Big Foot" and "UFOs" have been delusions, but these sightings of upsets in 2008 boxing are hard realities." ---TSS reader Radam is lovin' the upsets
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
To suggest story ideas to TSS, please email
To send us press releases and fight announcements, please email
To contact the editor, please email
|
|
|
|