Poll Position: How the Fans Voted
|
|
| Are TSS readers smarter than readers on other sites? |
 |
 |
 |
| Yes |
39% (92 votes) |
 |
 |
 |
| No |
45% (107 votes) |
 |
 |
 |
| What other sites? |
16% (38 votes) |
 |
 |
 |
|
What Counts Intelligence is a hard thing to measure. The race-slanted IQ tests notwithstanding, some people are book smart, some people are street smart, and some people aren’t smart enough or are too smart for their own good. Still, in trying to create, hold and give to an audience something that they cannot find elsewhere on the ‘net, while seeking to avoid the pitfalls of dumbing things down, we’ve concluded that there’s a demand for smart material for a cadre of smart fight fans. Since who’s who, like what’s what, is usually easier to guess at from the outside looking in, in your opinion, does The Sweet Science generally attract a smarter reader than the other boxing websites? |
|
 |
|
|
|
Witter A Slapper, A Flapper (A Career In The Crapper?)
"Another upset! I keep making the right bet. I never thought for a moment that Witter was a good boxer or a hitter. He is just another slapper and a big-mouth flapper. In the hurt business, no word can hit you like a fist. He got knocked on his butt, and his words didn't cushion his fall. Hopefully, he will now shut up. More of today's boxers should learn the art of hurting, and cut out all this garbage of hyping. All the sightings of "Big Foot" and "UFOs" have been delusions, but these sightings of upsets in 2008 boxing are hard realities." ---TSS reader Radam is lovin' the upsets
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
To suggest story ideas to TSS, please email
To send us press releases and fight announcements, please email
To contact the editor, please email
|
|
|
|