|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
 |
Haye Would Be Best Served Concentrating On Ruiz, Not The Klitschkos
By Frank Lotierzo
Finally after a month or more of speculation the anticipated WBA heavyweight title bout between champ David Haye 23-1 (21) and former champ John Ruiz 44-8-1 (30) will take place on April 3rd at Manchester's MEN Arena. The 29-year old Haye will be making the first defense of his title since since the former cruiserweight champ captured it from Russia's Nikolai Valuev in Germany this past November.
The 38-year old Ruiz took step aside money last year that paved the way for Haye to meet Valuev, fully aware that he'd get the first crack at the winner. Ruiz has made a career out of fighting the best heavyweights and belt holders of his era. In fact he fought Valuev twice for the title and other than the one big shot Haye landed on Valuev that shook him in the last round of their bout, Ruiz actually did more to the Russian giant but was hosed out of the decision both times in Germany because of politics and connections.
Earlier this week the press conference for Haye-Ruiz was held and Ruiz was a no show. To which Haye retorted, "We paid for his first class tickets over here, a great hotel and tried to accommodate him as best as possible. He didn't get on the flight. I don't know what his reason is." Hopefully Haye wasn't trying to imply that Ruiz had even the slightest bit of trepidation about facing him at the press conference. If there's one thing boxing fans know about Ruiz, it's that he doesn't fear any heavyweight walking the planet.
Then Haye said, "I will not only beat him but beat him spectacularly and knock him out. I'm looking forward to getting back to what I do best - throwing my trademark 'Hayemakers.' Ruiz is a come-forward fighter so I aim to get at him, break him down, and take him out in good style."
After seeing Monte Barrett get up numerous times against Haye before the fight was stopped, Ruiz will have to become a fossil on the night of the fight for Haye to have a prayer to get Ruiz out of there early or in a spectacular fashion.
Haye's vow to become the only other fighter to stop Ruiz in 53 bouts since David Tua did it 14 years ago makes for great copy, but I for one am not convinced that he possesses the tools for the execution he promises. Haye, like Floyd Mayweather Jr., has been great at self promotion, but his body of work as a heavyweight is a little underwhelming. And if he thinks he can intimidate or rattle John Ruiz in anyway shape or form he's mistaken.
Ruiz was a 24 year old who hadn't filled out yet physically as a fighter when he was caught by Hurricane Tua back in 1996. And Tua just happens to be the biggest one-punch banger since George Foreman circa 1973-74. Not to mention he was at his absolute peak the night he fought Ruiz. Yet it is Ruiz who went on to win a piece of the heavyweight title twice - whereas Tua has only fought for it once and lost.
John Ruiz is much tougher and better than Monte Barrett, and will be ten times tougher for Haye than the heavy-bag with eyes that Valuev fought like. This fight is only intriguing for one reason, and that's because at 38 it's uncertain what Ruiz has left as a top-10 heavyweight. But if this were Ruiz of the 2000-2003 vintage, he'd maul Haye and probably stop him in late in the fight.
Haye says he wants to showcase his skills again in front of the British public, something he failed to do when he fought Valuev and ran like a thief in the night in the process of stinking the place out. When Ruiz fought Valuev in 2005 and 2008 (a much better version than the one Haye fought) he at least tried to engage and win the fight straight up. By the time Haye faced Valuev, the promoters and boxing establishment realized they had nothing with him and the farce had to end. Which is the sole reason Haye was awarded the decision against him.
Evander Holyfield at age 47 had a better claim to the decision verdict over Valuev than David Haye did. It's just that a sullen old Holyfield wasn't the right business move when it came time to relieve Valuev of his title. However, a young brash guy like Haye was the perfect guy to hand the title to despite him doing less against the Russian giant than either Ruiz or Holyfield did during their three bouts with him.
Because of Haye's ability to talk up and sell a fight, he knows the only way he loses to Ruiz is if he gets stopped. On the other hand Ruiz hasn't been the luckiest guy around when it comes to getting the decision in close fights. Add to that he's 38 and he'd have to beat Haye half to death just to earn a draw against him.
Haye says his goal is to unify the heavyweight title by beating the Klitschko brothers, Vitali and Wladimir, who hold the WBC, IBF, and WBO titles between them. Which he'll no doubt earn the privilege of getting knocked out by one of them if he gets by Ruiz. And because of the way boxing works, it's hard to pick Ruiz knowing he has to win by a knockout. And nothing is harder than trying to knock out a fighter who is looking to survive - the mindset Haye will approach the fight with.
Knowing the decision is a forgone conclusion the smart pick looks to be Haye. But Ruiz may still have one more good night left in him, and if he does Haye will lose his title in his first defense. David Haye has shown to be a shrewd boxing manager and his cockiness isn't the worst thing for a heavyweight to posses in 2010. Let's see if he can back it up like the wannabe Cassius Clay aka Muhammad Ali he's become.
Seven of Ruiz's eight defeats came via decision. If Haye stops Ruiz - even a 38 year old on——he deserves all due credit. However, I reserve the right to wait for that to happen before I begin to take him completely seriously as a threat to the upper-tier heavyweights of today.
Frank Lotierzo can be contacted at GlovedFist@Gmail.com
|
donputo69:
|
Haye by KO...nuff said...holla back!!!
Friday Jan 29, 2010 09:00:19 PM
|
|
Real Talk:
|
SSSSNNNNcccaaaaaaaa....ZZZZzzzzzZZZZZzzzzZZZZ!!! Cough...Dueces
Friday Jan 29, 2010 09:25:13 PM
|
|
mortcola:
|
I'm holla-ing, dp69. I think there's a difference between Ruiz-is-boring and Ruiz-can't-fight. I'll take your bet. Haye is tall on talent, short on actual skill and experience. He fights DUMB, and he has no polish. The only tool in his box is a hammer, and it may not be a very big hammer. Ruiz is gonna stink him out, whack him around on the inside, and catch him lunging. Haye also wobbles, but unlike a weeble, he falls down. No reason to think Haye can beat a heavyweight of quality (yes, Ruiz is quality, even though I won't pay to watch him), except by puncher's chance - and the only heavyweights he's landed his so-called power on have been Monte Barrett, who I staggered once by saying hi to him, and Valuev, who, well...maybe Haye turns into a great heavy. But right now, its all imaginary.
Friday Jan 29, 2010 10:00:39 PM
|
|
Go Ruiz:
|
Haye lost his chance at heavyweight respect with the Valuev siesta. Ruiz is tough and has serious pop in his right mitt. Haye has to win big here or his stock crashes.
Friday Jan 29, 2010 10:29:01 PM
|
|
Peter Egley:
|
David Haye is a lot of fun and I'm rooting for him to become undisputed champ.
Friday Jan 29, 2010 11:40:43 PM
|
|
Isaiah:
|
Why is David Haye still ducking the Klitshckos?! Forget bum Ruiz! I want to see a real fight! Octopus Ruiz should know when to call it a "career".
Saturday Jan 30, 2010 12:06:09 AM
|
|
donputo69 @ isaiah:
|
octopus ruiz?...lmfaooo...i though he was spongebob ruiz....lmfaoo...holla back!!!
Saturday Jan 30, 2010 12:17:19 AM
|
|
mortcola@Peter Egley:
|
You're right. But Frank the Animal Fletcher was fun. I'll take Haye seriously when I see he's also a serious pro. So far, he's a loose cannon who's never beaten or even looked competent against a top heavyweight. I'll take fun when he shows some professionalism and some intelligent tactics on top of the trash talk and big swings.
Saturday Jan 30, 2010 01:34:39 PM
|
|
deepwater:
|
Haye by tko.haye has to fight the care bear johnny becouse of contracts.Haye has the power to stop ruiz.Ruiz has no defense but the clinch. Haye did what he had to do to beat valuev why is this writer hating on haye?
Sunday Jan 31, 2010 11:30:31 AM
|
|
Isaiah:
|
Personally, I'm hating on Haye because of how he ducked both of the Klitshcko brothers and I just really plain don't like how Evander Holyfield was robbed against Valuev even though that has nothing to do with Haye.
Sunday Jan 31, 2010 03:35:07 PM
|
|
Ryushinku:
|
To be fair, by recent interview Haye very much IS concentrating in Ruiz.
Monday Feb 1, 2010 09:06:30 AM
|
|
Aaron:
|
I think it'll always be a stain on Lennox Lewis' legacy that he didn't defend his titles against Ruiz. I understand he actually vacated a belt to get out a mandatory defense against Ruiz. Not that I don't think Lennox would have lost to him, but if he'd fought Ruiz he could have said he really cleaned out every meaningful heavyweight of his era, I mean he beat Tua, Johnny;s wost loss.
Tuesday Feb 2, 2010 12:19:20 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angie And Goody...23 Years Later
Twenty three years later after they seconded Marvin Hagler and Ray Leonard in Las Vegas, Goody Petronelli and Angelo Dundee crossed paths again. This time, it was at Foxwoods. Photo/friend of TSS "The Iceman" John Scully reports there were only pleasantries exchanged. Goody didn't debate the split decision victory enjoyed by Leonard, which to this day Hagler disputes.
|
|
|
|
|