|
 |
|
| Haye-Hopkins..interesting, no? Can Hopkins bulk up and grab a heavyweight crown? |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
 |
Hopkins Continues To Win At The Game Of Boxing
By Frank Lotierzo
In his fight with Enrique Ornelas Wednesday night, Bernard Hopkins confirmed once again that, at almost 45 years old, there's still a lot of fight left in him. No, Hopkins didn't look like a world beater and if you had never see him fight before you wouldn't have been overwhelmed by his showing. But that's not who Hopkins is. He never overwhelmed his opponents with Sugar Ray Leonard or Roy Jones type flash and physical brilliance nor is/was he a life-taker on the level of Thomas Hearns.
Bernard is a tough technician and a masterful counter-puncher. He first takes the bullets out of his opponents' guns and then dismantles them. And that's exactly what he did to Ornelas starting after the fourth round. From the fifth round on through to the conclusion of the twelfth Hopkins showed Ornelas something a little different each round. Just when Enrique thought Hopkins was in counter-punch mode, Bernard pressed him. When Ornelas thought he was fighting Hopkins the attacker, Bernard fought him on the inside and made good use of his shoulders and head.
No doubt Ornelas is hurting and feels physically like he was mugged by three or four guys. Bernard broke out all the tricks against Ornelas. Resting his head on the inside and tying his opponent up and hitting him with his free hand. The short double-counter rights on the inside mixed in with some lead left uppercuts and hooks, punches Hopkins seldom throws. During the course of the twelve rounds they fought, Hopkins displayed remarkable versatility and there wasn't anything Ornelas could do about it.
Hopkins clearly won the fight and controlled the action most of the way. But Ornelas did have his moments and did get through to Hopkin's chin a few times but really wasn't much more than competitive for the first half of the fight.
The Ornelas fight was the best thing in the world for a 44 year old fighter--12 rounds of good, solid work without having to risk too much, but against a guy who can win a few rounds from him. Hopkins is outsmarting all of us. However, the fight with Ornelas was supposed to be a tune-up and the start of his preparation for his proposed rematch with Roy Jones which was slated for March of 2010. But that came crashing down when Roy was stopped in the first round by cruiserweight Danny Green earlier in the day in Australia.
Jones wasn't even hit that hard and clearly has no punch resistance. Bernard can say all he wants that because Roy wasn't counted out or flat on his back when the fight ended that a fight between the two of them is still viable. The fact is nobody would pay to see Jones fight again regardless of who the opponent is. Hopkins held up his end of the deal and cannot do anything about Jones getting stopped and blowing any chance they had of meeting again 17 years after Jones won a decision over him when they fought in May of 1993.
So what now for Hopkins who is clearly not ready to retire and can still fight at the highest level in professional boxing? With Hopkins it's much more than finding an opponent who can make for a good fight. Hopkins is looking for legacy or break the bank fights only at this time. Someone wrote after Danny Green stopped Roy Jones that perhaps Green would be an attractive opponent for Hopkins, which is a joke.
Green is a big and strong cruiserweight who fights aggressively and can punch pretty good. Not only is he a tough stylistic match up for Hopkins, beating him doesn't really enhance his legacy. So we can forget about Hopkins fighting Danny Green unless it's for a ton of money and the odds of that are minuscule at best.
After the fight Hopkins said he'll be the heavyweight champ in 2010. Which is his way of conveying to the boxing public that he's looking to make a fight with WBA heavyweight champ David Haye. And that would be an intriguing fight. Hopkins would be fighting the smallest heavyweight in boxing who holds a major title. In addition to that, Hopkins is a much more experienced and better fighter than Haye. The question for Bernard is can he handle a 6'3" 215 pound younger fighter the caliber of David Haye? And that alone would be the intrigue of the fight.
Haye-Hopkins makes perfect sense for Bernard. It's doubtful that Hopkins would be hurt or embarrassed if he lost. And it's not like Hopkins's legacy would take any hit at all fighting Haye. He's basically playing with house money and would be an underdog in the fight. With that, Hopkins' legacy would be greatly enhanced if he were somehow able to beat David Haye after turning 45 years old.
In all likelihood Hopkins and Golden Boy Promotions will try to bring Hopkins and Haye together. And if that fight cannot be made then perhaps Hopkins will look to fight Chad Dawson which is another fight in which there's no downside for Hopkins not to mention the upside is monumental. That said, Dawson is a risky fight for Hopkins and I think he'll go in another direction if he can make another fight with the risk-reward tilting in his favor.
Hopkins has positioned himself great and is now at the point where he can choose whatever fight he thinks serves his career best. Regardless of who Bernard Hopkins fights next, he's assured himself that he'll retire with his health, wealth and legacy intact and will be remembered as the greatest fighter in boxing history who fought beyond their 40th birthday.
Frank Lotierzo can be contacted at GlovedFist@Gmail.com
|
bill major:
|
i enjoyed watching bernard the other night and thought he looked remarkably good.i know he can beat dawson who i dont think is all that good really,especially for his youth and size.he fights like a survivor to me.i think hopkins would be up for that one as he would haye and when hes up for a fight he is oldschool great!
Friday Dec 4, 2009 10:34:34 AM
|
|
brownsugar:
|
Good article,...Actually,...I'm the guy who wrote that Bhop should fight Green,... why not??? it's a comman practice in boxing,... beat the man who beat your opponent,..what better way to prove to yourself and the public that your ready for the big transition,... but Haye is far more dangerous for Bhop,.. than Danny Green could ever be,.. Haye is lightning fast,.. and is truly a punchers puncher,.. even shook the massively thick skulled Valuev,.. which up to his point,.. had never been done,.. and there's no natural threat that Bernard possesses to keep the agile,.. and much more powerful Haye at bay,.. it would be like throwing a leg of lamb into a school of pirahnnas,... I could see Bernard getting seriously hurt,.. and permanently ruined in that fight... Bhop can fight journey men in exhibitions,.. forever it seems,.. or he can retire,.. he has nothing left to prove,.. but if he moves forward,.. even with the sad state of the heavyweight division below Chambers,.. the Klitcho brothers,.. Solis and maybe a couple others,...it's is still a very dangerous proposition for Bernard,... I hope he keeps it in the light heavyweight division,.. even a fight with Adamek at cruiserweight would be a gross mismatch... fighting Dawson would make for a good paycheck and it would be the traditional way to pass the torch to the next generation...pc
Friday Dec 4, 2009 11:31:06 AM
|
|
Pachachis:
|
The fact is that Hopkins is just a dirty fighter. His hitting and holding and holding and hitting strategy apparently works due to lack of discipline from poor referees as the one assigned to this fight. Hopkins should have been penalized at least once EVERY round for excessive holding. Among the ones who rely on this “strategy,” (Mosley, Berto, Ruiz, Williams, to name a few, Hopkins is the WORST. Even the stupid announcers from Versus did not care to voice their criticism on his excessive holding, as they should have.
Friday Dec 4, 2009 12:04:42 PM
|
|
Pachachis:
|
The fact is that Hopkins is just a dirty fighter. His hitting and holding and holding and hitting strategy apparently works due to lack of discipline from poor referees as the one assigned to this fight. Hopkins should have been penalized at least once EVERY round for excessive holding. Among the ones who rely on this “strategy,” (Mosley, Berto, Ruiz, Williams, to name a few, Hopkins is the WORST. Even the stupid announcers on Versus did not care to voice their criticism on his excessive holding, as thy should have.
Friday Dec 4, 2009 12:50:57 PM
|
|
Matthew:
|
I don't know if I would rank Hopkins above Archie Moore in terms of being the best fighter ever past the age of 40, but he certainly deserves to be mentioned in the same breath. I don't see him getting a fight with Haye any time soon, since Haye has to fight Ruiz, and then Valuev is supposed to get a rematch. I doubt Hopkins would want to wait on the sidelines that long. My personal preference is a fight with Adamek. If that fight can't be made (and Hopkins low-balled him last time they negotiated), I'd like to see him fight Dawson. Old lion vs young lion. I'd favor Dawson slightly, but it's an even fight. Don't be surprised if Hopkins shows the young man a thing or two and beats him.
Friday Dec 4, 2009 12:55:21 PM
|
|
mortcola:
|
Moore is an all-time great. But he lost quite a bit in his old age. He's remembered more for remaining cagey, resourceful, and sometimes effective when out of his weight and age bracket. But Hopkins has remained dominant and highly adaptable, not all that different than at an earlier age. He has also maintained his fighting shape, even when moving way up in weight. As far as the Hopkins-Green point is concerned - Green is a legitimate two-handed power puncher and nearly a heavyweight. Sure, Hopkins is far slicker, but Green is a much better, bigger, and stronger opponent than Ornelas was. So, from a marketing standpoint it may be questionable, but its a valid fight. Not my first pick by a wide margin, but no joke.
Friday Dec 4, 2009 01:49:28 PM
|
|
Anony:
|
I AGREE WITH BROWNSUGAR... he should take on Green for 3-4 millions (as Roy supposedly earned for the fight) and then on Jones if he still wants the fight. I don't know about Haye... for legacy? Oh well... seems interesting.... what the heck. Grandpa can do it all, right?
Friday Dec 4, 2009 03:59:25 PM
|
|
Isaiah:
|
Bernard the Great! Does the man ever stop being so good? We'll see against another opponent who will be a serious threat. The last one being Kelly Pavlik, but I don't expect that kind of dominance again. If I personally knew Bernard, I would strongly recomend against going to Heavyweight and fighting anybody. Fight Chad Dawson or ask Danny Green to come on down to LightHeavy. Of course, I don't think Bernard ever asked an opponent to come DOWN in weight...
Saturday Dec 5, 2009 01:26:16 AM
|
|
gibola:
|
Hopkins is an all-time great but some writers are going OTT in praise of him. If his counterpunching and ability to adapt were so great how come he ran and threw no punches in both Taylor fights (fights he would have won if he had stood and fought) and the loss to Calzaghe. How were his fights with Eastman, ODLH and Wright so unwatchable. Hopkins is a great fighter but he is not as great as today's writers make him out to be. By the way I hate to tell you Hopkins-lovers but Jones Jr beats Hopkins by clear decision any time from 1993 to 2001. It only becomes competitive after RJJ is shot. Hopkins knew that and never pressed for a rematch when RJJ was the man.
Peace
Monday Dec 7, 2009 04:33:30 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angie And Goody...23 Years Later
Twenty three years later after they seconded Marvin Hagler and Ray Leonard in Las Vegas, Goody Petronelli and Angelo Dundee crossed paths again. This time, it was at Foxwoods. Photo/friend of TSS "The Iceman" John Scully reports there were only pleasantries exchanged. Goody didn't debate the split decision victory enjoyed by Leonard, which to this day Hagler disputes.
|
|
|
|
|