The Sweet Science
HOME ABOUT CONTACT
EnglishRussianChineseItalianDeutchFrenchSpanishPortugueseJapaneseKorean
The Sweet Science Boxing
Boxing Podcast Boxing RSS 
pacman


Wednesday Oct 28, 2009

Manny in action at Freddie's Wild Card on Monday. Roach says Manny's got more pop than ever before.

      Print this article     Email this article

Roach Says A Win Over Cotto Puts Manny In All-Time Top 5

By Michael Woods

Freddie Roach isn't simply the man who transformed a whirling dervish of kinetic energy into a technically adept, supremely focused hitter, he's Manny Pacquiao's most ardent fan.

OK, that mat be straying over the line, considering Manny whips more than 90 million of his countrymen, women and children into a frenzy of adoration typically reserved for deities. But Dedham Freddie has done more than any one person to bring Pacquiao to where he is today--the top of the pound for pound tier, or as Floyd Mayweather fans might assert, just beneath that level.

Mayweather's mastery on Sept. 19 against Juan Manuel Marquez had some pundits re-installing the American atop the P4P platform, despite his shadily obtained weight advantage. I moved into that camp myself, and suppose disagreements will have to stand until the inevitable showdown between Pacman and Mayweather. I say inevitable because I firmly believe that Pacquiao's hand speed is two notches better than Miguel Cotto's, and that he will add to Miguel's tattoo collection with shots Cotto doesn't see coming on Nov. 14. Speed equals power equals another improbable win for Pacquiao, and the seventh title, in the seventh weight division since he turned pro in 1995. My certainty, though, seems slight in comparison to that of Roach, who on a Wednesday conference call with Manny and promoter Bob Arum, made his case for Pacman being an all-time, pound for pound great.

With the win over Cotto, who holds the WBO title, by virtue of a hair-thin decision victory in his first defense against Joshua Clottey in June, Freddie says Manny will join a select crew. I didn't get a chance to ask Coach Roach who he has installed at the top of his own P4P list, but whoever is on the short list, he says Manny should join 'em.

The win would elevate Manny, Roach said, to the "five best of all time in any era.

"He's getting better and better," Roach said of the Filipino, who he termed a "Henry Armstrong-type guy." That Hall of Famer, of course, held the featherweight, lightweight and welterweight titles at the same time, and is on everybody's all-time top 5 list. Manny's 7 at 7 feat, Freddie said, will be "one of the greatest achievements ever," and he lumped in Manny with other multi-title greats like Sugar Ray Leonard and Thomas Hearns.

TSS U, let's bring you all into the mix. You on board with Roach's statement? Is Cotto enough of a test for you for Manny? You're not going to indulge in something that irks Roach to no end, and tear down Miguel after Manny has his way with him, are you?


Roach on the Wednesday call expressed annoyance that some pundits and fans blow off Manny's wins against Oscar De La Hoya, especially, and Ricky Hatton, dismissing the beaten men as shells of what they once were by the time they got to Manny.

Roach also broke a bit of news when he said that it is quite likely Manny will stop out at welterweight. No 154, then? "I don't think so," Roach said. "We're pretty close to our limit. We have to feed him five times a day to keep his weight up." That said, Roach said his confidence of a KO win comes from the power that Manny is showing during pad work. "At this weight, he's punching so much harder than he ever has. Cotto's defense isn't good enough, he's hittable."

Then again, Roach didn't go out of his way to present Cotto as high hurdle. He called him a "very good fighter" but didn't agree when someone offered that he could likely be the "biggest challenge" of Manny's career. "I'm very confident in my guy," said the trainer. "The power he has, he's gonna knock Cotto out. I'm very confident and look forward to a win. Cotto has never fought a guy like Manny, with his speed. I don't think he can handle our speed."

The trainer noted that the beating at the hands of Antonio Margarito (and are we ever going to get an answer to the question how many other times Margarito used loaded wraps of the type he was going to use against Shane Mosley?) took something out of Cotto, but that he's been building up his confidence incrementally since that July 2008 horror show. "Our job is to take that confidence away right away," said Roach, who expects Cotto to be in counterpuncher mode.

Some TSS readers have written comments touching on Cotto's perceived power edge. I haven't bought it, having believed for several years that Cotto's power is overrated, and that he didn't bring it all with him to 147. Roach seems to be of the same mind. "(Power) doesn't win, boxing ability wins fights, and Manny is the better boxer," he said. Pacquiao, being the humble human he is, lauded Cotto and told all that he's "not underestimating Cotto's capability in boxing." The boxer shrugged off an earlier Roach pronouncement, that Pacman would KO Cotto in the first round. He takes a kayo if the timing is right, he said.

Roach said that the first 24/7 episode captured the turmoil of Manny's camp in the Philippines correctly. Strength and conditioning coach Alex Ariza got into it with advisor Michael Koncz, and smacked Koncz. Viewers also saw Roach getting heated when Pacquiao wouldn't leave the typhoon-plagued section they were holed up in, and kept putting off an exit to a place with  more placid weather patterns. Viewers are left to wonder if this sparring and sniping will affect Pacman. Likely not...there have been factions in Pacquaio's camps for years, and the fighter shrugs off the drama like politicians shrug off tugs from their minute consciences.

Of a rumored tentative date for Pacman, Bob Arum wouldn't go there, saying that he wants to concentrate on Nov. 14, not March 13, when Pacquiao (or Cotto) could perhaps tangle with Floyd Mayweather.

Drop your early pred here, and feel free to amend the guess, after checking out the remaining 24/7s or off a gut call, or what have you.

add to Facebook add to Myspace add to Digg add to Mixx add to Linkedin add to Yahoo Buzz

Contact Michael Woods @ TheSweetScience.com


Smiley C:  Manny by seven knockout. He has too much speed and now awesome power in both hands. I agree with Coach Roach fo' sure!
Wednesday Oct 28, 2009 11:13:42 PM
Suge:  I agree 100% with Roach. Pac's already in my top 25 of all-time greats, a win over Cotto should elevate him into top 5.
Wednesday Oct 28, 2009 11:19:32 PM
jerry:  pacquiao to pulverize thw great pretender cotto in two..../
Wednesday Oct 28, 2009 11:30:41 PM
silly goose:  cotto tko in the 9th too much puertorican power for manny to handle
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:13:49 AM
Marco Polo:  I agree. Top 5 on all era's is fair. flyweight who flirted up to welterweight. damn! that's a 1 of a kind fighter.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:25:31 AM
Marco Polo:  strength alone cannot win
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:26:34 AM
Gardena LOC:  How much did wierdo roach and Pacman pay you for this completely bias and inaccurate article. hahaha lol The fact of the matter is the truth hurts the Roach ....He knows Cotto would demolish and devour Oscar. and ricky hatton any day of the week and twice on sunday quicker than the old man quit on the stool and the english drunk got knocked out COME ON!...Pac man wouldn't last 6 rounds against sugar shane....Clottey...or margacheatO with or without bricks in his gloves...so buy that! Michael lost in the boxing woods....youre lost in the pacman sauce...lol...Cotto is a Prime-Time welter buddy! CHECK THE RECORD - his past 5 foes much more difficult than pacboi hand picked money fights less risk more reward...On nov 14 "another hard jab by cotto!" pacman is not used to getting a jab smashed in his mini george foreman grill all night...Better boxer? pacman? when? lol he is 1 dimensional with speed...Oh boy! cotto all around boxer counter puncher..jabber. power shots...speed neutralizer..his speed is also deceptive (ask sugar shane boy) after he lost in points! WOW! who hired this writer? mustve been roach lol
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:28:22 AM
Gardena LOC:  another thing kids! Sugar shane, Margacheato (with bricks) Zab judah Carlos quintana (who beat paul williams a middleweight now) Ricardo Torres could not let me repeat could not ok 1 more time COULD NOT knock out Cotto even with bricks in margos hands he couldn't knock him out Cotto succumbd to the concrete and gave up in the end what in the name of Sanity makes you believe this little short ribbed man from the phillippines can? lol are you serious lol The boricua warrior can't have that didn't you know! he loves to bleed! i don't care if hes faster than the flash it is not happening folks lets get out of the dream world realm and highlight real against inferior competition who cares if the names he beat is popular AGAIN inferior competition! Cotto equals pacmans worst nightmare when he wakes up in the middle of the nigh more dangerous than those typhoons... its the puerto rican hurricane!! CATEGORY 7! 150 MPH power winds hahahaha
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:37:46 AM
Jay Ari Yin:  Manny Pacquiao winning against Cotto will put him in the top 15 of the all time greats list. After Cotto, if Manny wins over Mosley, he will be at least a top 10 all time great. Only in defeating Mayweather will put him at no. 5 all time great. Manny winning against Cotto, Mosley and Mayweather, in that order, will also make him the winner of a 5th ring and lineal weight class championship.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:39:39 AM
in touch:  Greatest of all time: 1. ali. 2. ray robinson. 3. pacquiao. 4. roberto duran. 5. sugar ray leonard.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:42:35 AM
Isaiah:  I have to be realistic. Miguel Cotto wins by 10th round KO. Like Roy Jones used to say, ya'all musta forgot! If Pacquiao can beat Cotto and Mayweather, that isn't Pacquiao being just an all time great. That means Pacquiao is SUPERMAN DUDE!!! I kind of really want Cotto to defy the odds, but if Pacquiao beats Cotto and Mayweather... SHOOT! Better just bow down son!!! Greatness walks among us! I consider myself a manly guy, but if Pacquiao can beat Cotto and Mayweather, I'll be crying tears of joy! I could see it now, getting drunk out in the streets with some associates as we scream the F U MAYWEATHER chant. I came up with it myself.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:45:00 AM
a message to MCotto:  Juan Manuel Marquez drank piss and was able to last the distance again marvelous Money Mayweather. Miguel Cotto should follow that lead. He should drink his piss and see how far it will take him against Pacman fo' sure!
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 06:02:11 AM
kountedout:  i have to agree mostly with GardenaLoc, even though im pulling for cotto an he is in his prime i dont like the training of cotto from what i saw. judah an corley both hurt cotto. judah with uppercuts, corley with right hook. both punches how cotto's hand and boxing stance is will be susceptible to getting caught with. if cotto turns southpaw which he can do pretty well he then would have the best opportunity to off set manny very well because manny has not faced many southpaws period. cotto has fought the better fighters but is that good or bad? doing so it might have taken a lot out of him or its toughen him up more and given him more experience to handle more. manny by far is not a great boxer they have handpicked the right opponents for manny and how can you put him the top 15 all time greats by beating hatton and oscar? he turned pro as a teenager a lot of mexican fighters in mexico turn pro as a teenager as well
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 06:21:02 AM
Marcdark:  Theres kno way Pacman is in the top five of all time even if he beats cotto. U dumb fans dont kno nothing about boxing. Manny has not really beat any good fighters. just because he beat hatton who is garbage and a washed up oscar dont mean nothing. Pacman is a good fighter but he is nowhere near the top 5 all time. He has no boxing skills is just all speed and power. All you gotta do is out box him dont brawl with him. Cotto his the better skills to win but if he loses Mayweather will finish Pacman once and for all!
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 06:26:35 AM
Frank Z:  I'm just gonna give my top 5 all time regardless what happens november 14th. 1. Sugar Ray Robinson 2. Sam Langford 3. Henry Armstrong 4. Willie Pep 5. Joe Louis
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 06:33:37 AM
Fleetwood:  Manny has avoided too many good boxers to ever be in the top five P4P. If you were the type to stand right in front of him and bang (Dela Hoya, Hatton, Marquez etc), him and his camp were eager to meet you. If you had the common sense to slip a punch or move out of the way of one his wild rushes (Guzman comes to mind), him and his camp weren't all that eager to get in the ring with you. So, just like Floyd, I could never put this dude in the top five, ten, fifteen or twenty because they have hand picked too many of their fights.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 06:41:19 AM
Matthew:  To put Pacquiao in the top 5 all-time pound-for-pound is laughable. I think with what he has done in the last 18 months, he has proven that he is a great fighter, but he is not breathing the rareified air that is top 5 all-time. No way can I put him in with Robinson, Armstrong, Ali, Pep, or Joe Louis (my top 5). He's not even close to top 10, and I certainly don't rate him higher than Arguello (whom I would probably put somewhere in the 20s). I don't see any way that those names in the top 10 could possibly change anytime soon, given the accomplishments of those giants and the way boxing is today. As for the Pacquiao-Cotto fight, I am leaning toward Cotto by narrow decision, but I woudn't be at all surprised to see Cotto get old overnight. We'll see if the speed differential is as great as many think it is. I don't think Cotto will ever be what he was prior to the Margarito beating, but we'll find out what he has left.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 07:10:58 AM
The Saint:  Pacquiao is in a no-win situation here. There's obviously a racist sentiment against him being from the far east. WHEN Pacquiao knocks Cotto out in 5 rounds or less, people will simply blame it on the catchweight. Should Cotto pull off the miracle and win, people will say that Pacquiao was overhyped all along.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 07:31:09 AM
GOAT @ Frank Z:  Frank, have you ever seen Sam Langford fight? I heard he was good but I never seen him fight so to me it would be dificult to adequately judge his place on an All Time List. Freddie Roach is crazy! Who did Pacman beat at or near their prime to be considered in the top 5 P4P of all time? In his last 4 fights he fought 3 of the fighters PBF beat but people say PBF is overated, how can that be? If Pac is an Alltime great for beating fighters a,b,c,and d, then PBF should be an alltime great for beat fighters a,b,and c. Lets see how Pac does against PBF before we bestow greatness on him.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 07:35:16 AM
Frank Z@ GOAT:  Yeah there's a couple of his fights on youtube, plus if you check out the book by Clay Moyle on him it talks about his career and the opinions of his contemporaries who saw him fight. Some of the respected opinions at the time thought he could have KO'd Joe Louis if they had met in their primes, and this was when a young Louis was knocking out everybody. That plus the fact that Langford beat people from lightweight through heavyweight in his day and had about 300 official fights.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 07:55:59 AM
The Saint:  @GOAT. The difference between Pacquiao and Pretty Boring Floyd is that "fighters a, b, c, d" were either naturally bigger than Pacquiao or at the very least, the same size. As far as the common opponents they faced, with the exception of JMM, Pacquiao beat them in more spectacular and dominating fashion. And since Mayweather likes to take credit for other people's successes ("I wrote the blueprint to beat DLH, Hatton" blah blah blah), then maybe Pacquiao should take credit for Mayweather's victory over Marquez. Pacquiao definitely softened up Marquez for Mayweather. DLH was just as post-prime against Mayweather as he was against Pacquiao, and Mayweather barely escaped with a split decision, despite being the favorite. Some people believe that DLH won that fight. Pacquiao was the HUGE underdog against DLH, and it was DLH who picked and pursuedPacquiao, not the other way around. Andwhen he beat him from pillar to post, people wrote off DLH as being drained. Mayweather was a great LIGHTWEIGHT, but he has not fought ANY of the top welterweights. This is only Pacquiao's 2nd trip to the welters and he's already fighting Cotto. Most of the top welters have gotten tangled with each other (Mosley, Cotto, Williams, Margarito) and not surprisingly, Mayweather's name is not in that mix. It is Mayweather who chooses his opponents, not Pacquiao.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 08:15:25 AM
Matthew:  I'm in the process of watching Langford vs Fireman Jim Flynn on YouTube, and I find it tough to watch. It looks a lot more like wrestling than boxing, but I suppose that was the style of the era. Jack Johnson did his fair share of holding and hitting as well, and we know he did refuse to fight Langford once he became champion. Langford's career numbers are certainly impressive, and he was definitely undersized for a heavyweight, but just based on what I'm seeing I have a hard time putting in the top 10 P4P. Maybe because I'm in my 30s, I don't have the proper frame of reference.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 08:29:03 AM
The Saint:  @Matthew- "all time great" lists are highly subjective in nature, and everyone's entitled to their opinion. We're no longer in the era of fighters having over a hundred fights, and if sheer number of wins is your main criteria, then Pacquiao doesn't stand a chance. The thing with Pacquiao's career is that it wasn't fabricated from the very beginning the way De La Hoya's or Cotto's were, with every matchup being carefully planned according to a strict schedule that's mapped out all the way to the first title fight they're going to get. The boxing community has followed their careers from beginning to present and celebrated every victory, whereas with Pacquiao, people only took notice in the last few years, the past year, really, near the end of his career. The road that took Pacquiao to where he's at today is filled with more drama and excitement, the main reason sports was invented in the first place. Also, it's funny how you're already preparing to write off Pacquiao's inevitable victory over Cotto by saying that Cotto could "get old overnight." Your circular reasoning is primed. "Pacquiao could only beat Cotto if Cotto gets old overnight; since Pacquiao beat Cotto, Cotto must've grown old overnight."
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 08:35:41 AM
ali:  Top 5 all-time HELL NO! before Willie Pep, Ali Louis, Armstrong, Robinson, Duran, Mayweather, ect. He's fighting good fighters but until he beat a great boxer puncher like Mayweather or even Mosley he will not even be close to making my top five list.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 09:03:19 AM
Anonymous user:  Mayweather's greatest hits above lightweight: De La Hoya (already KO'd by Hopkins, already beaten twice by Mosley), Ricky Hatton (barely got past Collazo) , Carlos Baldomir, Arturo Gatti, Zab Judah Mayweather's greatest hits around lightweight: Genaro Hernandez (already TKO'd by DLH), Jose Luis Castillo (who most boxing fans believe beat Mayweather on their first fight), Diego Corrales (by far Mayweather's biggest win and the ONLY fighter Mayweather fought who was bigger, stronger and considered to have a legitimate chance of beating him). No way Mayweather belongs in the top 50 of all-time. His "O" is the most meaningless "O" I've ever seen.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 09:18:07 AM
puncher:  If anybody in this forum truely believes that JMM is better than Cotto can then say with total certanty that the Pac Man beats Cotto by KO. I know that both fights were wins for the Pac Man, but he got the crap kicked out of him from a boxer in a lighter wieght. Now he will be fighting a boxer with the same skills but STRONGER. Cotto by anything over PacMan.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 09:30:34 AM
swift:  Goat - Have you seen where Manny has come from? He fought a prime Barrera, after Barrera beat the piss out of Naseem Hamed. He knocked out Erik Morales who was never knocked out before that. He should have stopped JM Marquez in his prime, if it wasn't for bogus rules (3 knockdowns). The guy is a legend!! I just don't want to hear Cotto fans make excuses about losing 2 freaking pounds. The guy is about 5-9, he should be able to make that weight with ease. If Paul Williams can make 147 and 160, Cotto should be able to make 145!
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 09:37:56 AM
GOAT:  My point is that we make excuses for Pacman when discussing his "greatness" but we harshly criticize PBF. Just read some of the post before this one. People are saying PBF never fought bigger oponents when in reality, the only "smaller" fighters PBF fought were Hatton and Marquez. A true boxing fan will have to admit that the same Oscar that fought PBF was not the same Oscar that fought Pacman. Fighters usually "get old" overnight, Just look at RJJ. The same RJJ that fought Ruiz was clearly not the same RJJ that fought Tarver. I find it hard to believe that a fight that has that many loses to no-name fighters and has been knocked out a couple of times is considered to be in the top 5 P4P fighters of all time. It's not like he was Ko'ed at the end of his career or he was hit with a lucky punch, he was clearly beaten and KTFO! Marquez even made Pac do the Zab Judah walk when he hit him. Someone explain to me how he is an All time great already! At the end of his career we will be able to judge him for greatness but not before then.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 09:45:04 AM
GOAT @ Swift:  Barerra nor Morales were in there prime when Pac fought them. In fact, Morales beat him the first time very easily. Morales then lost to Zaheer Raheem (that goes to show he was washed up) before the rematch with Pac. Marquez won the majority of the rounds in the two fights with Pac but he hardly touched PBF. I don't hate Pac, I actually like him as a fighter and I think he is good for boxing, but I just hate the double standards people have towards him and other fighters. Pac is a man who has been knocked out and his best wins are against people PBF beat but we say PBF is overrated and Pac is great? People say Pac started out fighting at 106 but he was 17 years old! Check to see how much PBF weighed at 17 ( He won an Amatuer title at 106 at 17) so don't give me that PBF is bigger garbage. I can't wait to Pac gets in the ring with a real master like PBF.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 09:51:53 AM
frank:  top 5 in no order: Duran, Benny Leonard, Greb, Robinson and Armstrong.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:11:30 AM
frank:  Pacman in 2
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:14:17 AM
d:  cotto is a very solid fighter. i dont think hell be the same as before margarito but he shouldnt have to be he is one hell of a fighter strong, fast in his own right and most importantly to me i dont think he thinks little manny can beat him. that is huge. its all mental. if pac does beat him i think he is one of the best. if he can beat cotto i have him beating mayweather but personally i see cotto beating pac getting even more confidance back and then he might get a win over mayweather.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:19:19 AM
MisterLee:  Roach Boma Ye!!! I agree, at least top ten of all time. Umm.... Pac within 8 rounds, KO. Forget that TKO stuff, cotto is gonna stumble around and chicken dance, most likely by rounds 3-5 , but i'm saying 8 to be safe. Brewing crow baby!!!
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:29:30 AM
The Saint:  @GOAT. Mayweather lost to Jose Luis Castillo the first time, you know it, everybody knows it. Since then Mayweather has been playing it safe and protecting his undefeated record by handpicking opponents, avoiding the fighters that everybody wants him to fight (please don't tell me that the public was clamoring for Mayweather to fight Baldomir or Judah). You're really stretching it if you're going to claim that Mayweather isn't bigger than Pacquiao. Mayweather is not a "real master." A real master doesn't squeak by an aging fighter like De La Hoya with a split decision. A real master (Pacquiao) boxes circles around washed up fighters and rearranges their faces. I hear that Mayweather is now targeting a 19-year old fighter that nobody's heard off. Pure class.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:31:23 AM
matthew:  @The Saint. I'm not in any way already "writing off" a Pacquiao victory against Cotto. I think you may have misinterpreted my comment. First of all, a Pacquiao victory is anything but "inevitable." The beauty of this matchup is that there is genuine uncertainty among most knowledgeable boxing fans as to the winner. A Pacquiao victory, at least at this point, is not a foregone conclusion (although it could seem that way in hindsight). While I think Cotto can and will win, I would not be surprised at all if Pacquiao wins. If Pacquiao wins, but Cotto is competitive, then we can't say Cotto got old overnight. If Cotto is beaten down in one-sided fashion (similar to the Margarito bout), then it might be evident that he got old overnight. Cotto has been in a lot of tough fights (even other than the Margarito fight), and it may catch up to him. If Manny wins, he will still get credit from me either way for beating a legitimate, close-to-prime welterweight. Mayweather certainly hasn't done that. But let's not make Pacquiao into Henry Armstrong just yet. While winning a title at 135 is quite a feat, he did it against David Diaz, not Nate Campbell. Beating De La Hoya at 147 is impressive considering the size differential and what Manny weighed when he turned pro, but Oscar clearly was an empty shell. I think the Hatton victory is more impressive than the previous two, but I think beating Cotto would be his most impressive accomplishment to date.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:44:10 AM
The Saint:  @puncher: JMM is absolutely better in every way than Miguel Cotto, but Cotto is significantly stronger, which is pretty much Cotto's main advantage Has it ever occured to you that Pacquiao's strength was dramatically affected by having to make the jr. lightweight limit, hence his struggle with Marquez? Are you saying that Pacquiao's quicksilver style since he moved up is just a coincidence? The guy has not lost a round in three fights. Pacquiao has been more unhittable than Mayweather in his last 3 fights, without having to run the way Mayweather does. Nobody can say with absolute certainty what's going to happen between Pacquiao and Cotto. Smart money's on Pacquiao, but I don't have 100% confidence in Pacquiao's chin.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:45:32 AM
The Saint:  @matthew: So you're saying that unless Cotto wins or he loses in a competitive match, Cotto grew old overnight? It's not possible at all that Pacquiao is as good as some people say it is if Pacquiao ends up blowing Cotto away easily?
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:48:35 AM
dr3r42:  Sam Langford was 5-7, 175 llbs; if anyone thinks he'd win a title today or beat any of the post WWII ATG's at heavy, more power to you. Most people who rate him high today have never even seen him fight. Now I only have videos of 3 or 4 of his fights, but like most of the pre-WWI fighters, most of his fights are quasi-wrestling matches. That's the thing, everyone screams when John Ruiz fights that way today, but the same people are in awe of Langford, Johnson, Jeffries -as long as the film's grainy and in B&W, people watch it with stars in their eyes. Not saying Langford wasn't great in that era (those guys would be DQ'ed today for all the blatent holding and wrestling) but a lot of his legend is propped up by Ring Magazine editor Nat Fleischer, who like most people viewed his era (1900-1920) as a golden era and believed that most fighters after 1929 sucked. Look at his top 10 heavies of all time: 167 llb Bob Fitzsimmons at #3 ? 175 llb James Corbett at #5 (both ahead of Joe Louis who was #6). And 5-7, 175 llb Langford at #7 ? At the same time he doesn't even think that Ali or Liston (or Frazier for that matter) were anywhere near being top 10 ATG's (when Marciano retired Fleicher said that he wasn't a top 10 heavy- that should tell you something about Fleischer's cred-when he suddenly changed his mind yearas AFTER Marciano retired). So Fliescher's the one who influenced the thinking of many so called experts that many people go off of today.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:49:42 AM
pedro:  pacquaio is one of the greatest boxer who ever step in the ring. if you can name one boxer that held seven belts in seven weight class, then you're right, he's not one of the top 5. if you cant name one, then STFU! you can came name all these great fighters, but what make them greats was thier battles with other greats. pacquaio also did that with oscar, barrera, marquez and morales and also fighting is diffrent weight class and beating the crap of supposedly bigger men. he never ducks like floyd, never cry like shane and more skills than cotto. the man has a class of a champion. He just let his fist do the talking for him. so for all you haters out there, just enjoy watching coz he wont be around long. when he retires, you'll wish he could stay in boxing forever.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:07:35 AM
dr3r42:  Another thing about the "Golden Era". Everyone says "they used to fight 50 rounds back in the day, these sissies today can't even fight 12 rounds." First off, 50 round fights were rare, as were 20 round fights, and if anyone actually sat through the boredum (most of those fights were edited, because they were BORING) you'd notice that most of the times the fighters didn't exactly open up-because they knew they had to pace themselves for a 20+ round fight. In the 26 round Jack Johnson-Jess Willard fight, Johnson landed about 110 punches, and Willard landed about 60 (source the Associated Press) that's about 4.5 punches landed by Johnson per round, and less than 3 by Willard. WTF ! Not exactly Tua-Ibeabuchi, where both threw about 1700 punches in their 12 round fight. Yet people think that a 5-7, 175 llb, face-first fighter like Sam Langford would just go into the 235 llb Ibeabuchi's wheelhouse and walk right through him (same with Tua). I guess the laws of physics only apply to today's fighters
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:09:52 AM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  I'm sorry guys but I have to disagree with Roach! If Manny beats Cotto I WOULD HAVE TO PUT MANNY ON MY TOP 3 ALL TIME GREATS! As I've stated before that Manny already has secured his great legacy, intact this win would just be the icing to the cake. Those who can disagree with me is just plain blind and can't accept the truth.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:10:29 AM
GOAT @ The Saint:  Come on man, you don't believe that arguement. Saying no-one wants to see PBF fight is nonsense since he continues to sell many PPV buys. EVERYFIGHTER HANDPICKS OPONENTS! That's the nature of boxing. Isn't PW trying to handpick a oponents now! Isn't Shane trying to handpick an oponent now! Didn't Pacman handpick his past 3 oponents? That's the business of boxing and it has nothing to do with skills. If you say PBF is not a boxing master, then I don't know what you've ben watching. The man won his first championship in his 18th pro fight by beating Genaro Hernandez and he has been a champion ever since then. That's 22 pro fights as a champ. When you are PBF every fight is difficult because other fighters want to be the fiirst to beat you, so he always gets everyone's "A" game. As for the Castillio fight, every fighter great fighter has at least one fight that could go either way. Didn't Pacman have one against Marquez? Didn't Oscar have several against SweetPea and Quartey? Didn't Hopkins have one against Taylor? The difference is PBF had an immediate rematch and beat him again, this time more convincingly. You know you're great when the best arguement that can be made against you is a close win.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:10:47 AM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  Manny is a rare breed and we only witness every 50 years. If Manny gets past Cotto with ease and face Mayweather and win I would have to put him as the Greatest of All Time. Don't knock on me when I say that because I don't hear any barks when Mayweather calling himself the Greatest when his track record isn't as good as Manny's.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:17:35 AM
blue4cor:  LOW BLOW is one of my biggest concern. I believe Judah could have pulled off a career defining victory. If Marvin Hagler was beffudled by Sugar Rey's speed , how much more a combination of speed and power by Pacquiao can bring to the table. Simple as ABC.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:33:52 AM
Matthew:  @The Saint. Anything is possible in boxing; that's why Larry Merchant often refers to it as "the theatre of the unexpected." Given the amount of mileage on Cotto's odometer, and the way he fought against Clottey (a fight I had thought Clottey won, by the way), wouldn't you say it is possible that Cotto could get old in a hurry? I'd say that it's possible, but I won't know until I see the fight and how it all goes down. I don't expect a replay of Pacquiao-Hatton or Curry/McCrory, but it could happen. For the record, Hatton didn't get kayoed because he suddenly got old; he lost because he lost his head, tried to rush straight in, and got caught with straight, well-placed punches that he never saw coming. Cotto is a far more technically sound fighter than Hatton.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:34:28 AM
The Saint:  @goat: First of all, what I said was that nobody wanted to see Mayweather-Judah or Mayweather-Baldmoir when they could've had Mayweather vs Mosley, Cotto, Williams and the then perceived monster in Margarito. Tell me that you'd be satisfied to never see Floyd fight any of those guys. Floyd has deprived boxing fans of potentially great matchups by choosing to take the path of not the least resistance, but no resistance whatsoever. And no, Pacquiao did not handpick his last 3 opponents. De La Hoya handpicked Pacquiao and had to convince everybody else that Pacquiao is a good match (you know it's a mismatch when the opponent is going out of his way to make everyone believe that his opponent is really tough, although in this case, the mismatch turned out to be in Pacquiao's favor). And for the record, I don't think much of DLH, he's the king of paper champs, but that's a subject for another discussion. I was glad that he got beat up by little Manny, but to me the victory wasn't that surprising. Every fighter wins fights that could've gone either way. And no, the "close win" is not the "best argument" against Mayweather. You know a fighter is great when he has fought and beat the best, which outside of the lightweight division, Mayweather has not done. Mayweather's legacy is that he has avoided every single top welterweight. The welterweight division has been the hottest division for the past 3 or 4 years, and Mayweather has been a welterweight for that long, and he managed to somehow avoid fighting the likes of Mosley, Williams and Cotto. A great fighter like Leonard was inactive for 3 years and HE moved up in weight to fight Hagler, perhaps post-prime but still regarded the best middleweight in the world. Mayweather picked the smallest risk with the greatest reward. And since Mayweather likes to take credit for Pacquiao's destruction of De La Hoya and Hatton, claiming that he wrote the blueprint to beat them, I'd like to give Pacquiao credit for Mayweather's easy, boring win over Marquez. Pacquiao softened up Marquez for Mayweather. Mosley is not "handpicking" today so much as he is desperately seeking an opponent. Have fought Forrest twice, Wright twice and Margarito hardly qualifies Mosley as one who handpicks his opponents.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:38:23 AM
Matthew:  By the way, I think most educated boxing fans would agree that Castillo beat Mayweather the first time around (I scored it 115-113 for Castillo). By all accounts, Mayweather won the rematch fairly comfortably. Ever since those two fights, Mayweather has definitely been more selective about whom he fights (not fighting Stevie Johnston at 135, selecting Gatti instead of the more dangerous Tszyu, fighting Baldomir, making Hatton come up to 147, etc.). Great fighters, when they are fighting top competition, will lose a time or two; it happens to almost everybody. Mayweather seems more interested in protecting his undefeated record than enhancing his legacy.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:44:54 AM
alvins:  I'm one of those who think that Cotto's power might be a telling factor in figuring out who's gonna win this fight. I sure hope you're right.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:48:46 AM
TooFast:  Pac is too fast, and from what I keep hearing, too strong. Cotto doesn't have the tools to evade this typhoon. I'm calling a good meal for Pac-man before the 6th round. KO-expect it to be nasty.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:53:33 AM
GOAT @ Matthew @ The Saint:  Both of are to smart to make those arguements against PBF. Matthew you said that PBF fought Gatti instead of Tszyu, but Tszyu didn't want to fight PBF and not the other way around. Bob Arum said Cotto wasn't ready to fight PBF after seeing PBF destroy Gattis and turned down the fight. PBF bought out his contract with Arum right before Arum came to him with the 8 Mil for margarito fight. What no-one writes is that if PBF would have fought Marg for 8 mil, Arum would have options on PBF's next five fights and since PBF just bought out his contract, it wasn't a smart business move to sign for that fight. Plus both of you follow boxing so you have to know that Promoters (King, Arum, Gossen, Shaw, etc) always offer a fighter a lot of money initially for a fight and they in return get options on the fighters next few fights. These next few fights, the promoters "cheat" the fighter out of money by low balling him on the purse and if the fighters refuses to fight for the low money, then he is shelved until he conforms. This happens in boxing and in the music industry Ask nate Campbell. So when a fight is not made, it's not always because of the two fighters. Lastly, PBF was cheduled to fight the true Welter champ and recognized as the best welter at the time (Zab) but Zab lost to Baldo. PBF still smacked Zab around and people said he was afraid to fight the "real" champ in Baldo (Check HBO Boxing to read the articles in past fights). After that, PBF fought ODH at 154 for the money and the glory (Same as Pac) and then he fought Hatto (same as Pac) for the money, then he retired. How can you duck someone if you are retired? If PBF doesn't fight the top guys in the next year or so, then you can say he ducked these fighters, but remember, Shane ducked him at lightweight.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:05:18 PM
Huna:  As far as motivation goes, the timing of the Typhoons could not have come at a worse time for Miguel Cotto. Manny knows how devasting a loss would be to his countrymen during this time. The ravages of the Typhoons will only intensify Manny's will and determination to win this fight for his country. I feel sorry for Cotto as he will be the whipping post for all Filipinos to regain their hope. Poor Cotto!!! If Manny wins this seventh title he is the man and in the top five. When you've achieved what no one else has, seven titles, you the man. To say otherwise is to announce your stupidity. It's like saying the Steelers, Cowboys, Patriots , 49ers suck and their Super Bowl titles mean nothing. Oh Okay now we know where you're coming from...LaLa Land
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:17:48 PM
Roach is Right:  Roach is correct. He is a genius. Manny is an all time top three for me, he being the numero uno.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:17:53 PM
Castro:  I got Cotto winning this one fellas! I even bet my brother (again) a hundred bucks that Cotto will do it. I lost last time against "glass chin hatton" so I need to redeem myself & get my money back. Should've known better. But oh well. Gotta pay to play! As for Manny being in the all time top 5 - I say no way! Maybe the top 25, but that's the most I'll give em. There are quite a few fighters out there he should fight still to even be considered one of the top 10 greats. One of those fights being against Mosley, Margarito, Bradley, MoneyMay & of course the final one to end a highly sought after trilogy against the one & only Marquez! (Cuz if Manny loses - I say that is exactly who he needs to glove up with next!) After that....I'm pretty sure we'll all be a little bit happier here at TSS. lol I'm with Gardena, Isaiah, Kountedout, Frank Z & silly goose on this one. If I missed anyone....my bad, but you know I got your back too! Pc out!
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:25:07 PM
The Saint:  @Matthew: My problem is that you are bent on denying Pacquiao his due credit. If Pacquiao dominates or destroys Cotto, your conclusion will be that Cotto grew old overnight and not Pacquiao being as great as his devoted fans claim him to be. You are protecting Cotto's legacy by saying that the only way he would lose badly to Pacquiao is if he got old overnight. Should Cotto win, I suspect that you will instantly declare Pacquiao as an all-time great to elevate Cotto even higher.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:38:20 PM
g dot:  I'm sorry but i can't put manny as top 5 all time, let's see, you have Ali, Louis, Leonard, Robinson, Dempsey, Lamotta, Marciano, Duran, Julio Ceaser Chavez, Hearns, that's ten off the top of my head that i would rank above Manny... but i do believe that 7 titles in 7 divisions is quite an accomplishment, but i still cant even put him in my top ten, he's ducking marquez, and will not fight Mayweather even Cotto has faced better opposition over his entire career
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:42:36 PM
The Saint:  @GOAT. Excuses, excuses. The fact remains that Mayweather has been a welterweight for several years and is yet to fight one top welterweight. Margarito has fought Cotto, Mosley and Williams while Mosley, Cotto and Margarito have all fought each other. I'm sure none of those names are "worthy" to fight PBF while Juan Manuel Marquez was, a 36-year old lightweight who had a life and death struggle against Juan Diaz. I'm actually quite surprised that Mayweather hasn't gone after Chris John, since Chris John beat Marquez, therefore making John the "real number two."
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:45:25 PM
BunchaIjots:  There are people on here who believe that they are some sort of boxing savant and in the same post claim that Pacquiao hasn't faced anyone of note or that he's dodged everyone. That's about as moronic a statement as anyone can make.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:50:20 PM
White Tiger:  i can't imagine people here putting pac against PBF. If you talk for greatness, fairness is the judge. Weight class should be observe by any means. PBF should match against A list of welterweights and Pac should stay at LW if they will or stay at JLW. Pac defies logic and PBF is good at exercising logic, they are both great at their own rights, only their attitude differs. The other is full of insecurities(Floyd) the other has full of confidence.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:53:10 PM
The Saint:  @g dot: Since when did fighting somebody TWICE constitute "ducking?" Marquez can't manage to not get knocked down. He's a bad matchup for Manny, but Marquez believed his own hype and went for Mayweather and got brought back to reality. Pacquiao would be more than happy to send Marquez back to dreamland should they fight for a third time at a comfortable weight for Pacquiao.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:53:47 PM
tebs:  Here's my All Time Top 5 if Pacquiao beats Cotto via knockout: 1) Robinson 2) Pacquiao 3) Armstrong 4) Ali 5) Duran
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:57:35 PM
LC:  PAC would be ahead SRL, Duran, Benitez, Arguello. SRR, ALI, Armstrong, Joe louis, PAC ---TOP FIVE ATG.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 12:59:57 PM
LC:  White Tiger: Floyd Jr. LEGACY is questionable and has **** asterisk coz he has avoided far many dangerous fighters in his division... PAC's lagacy on the hand is SECURE.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 01:02:32 PM
Waltey:  I agree with everything that The Saint posts, and don't expect for Americans to respect or ever give Pacquiao credit no matter how many times he knocks out whomever is put in front of him. If Mayweather steps up and fight him, and loses that goose egg, these Asianhaters will claim that at 33 years old Mayweather was washed up. The American way is to make excuses. They never stopping bragging before a defeat, and never stop whinning and hating afterward. Cotto is going to be knocked out in two or three rounds. Maybe he will just tap out again.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 01:03:44 PM
The Saint:  @gdot: And it is Mayweather who does not want any part of Pacquiao. All Mayweather had to do was wait a few hours to see who won the Pacquiao-Hatton fight but instead announced JMM as his next opponent. Mayweather will price himself out of a Pacquiao fight. He will wait for the top welters to fight and beat each other so that he won't have to fight any of them.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 01:05:43 PM
Lar Lachica, Jeddah:  Nice arguments and thought brought in here..... For me, i don't mind if The Pacman is not listed or considered in Top 20, 10 or even 5 in GOAT.... What matters to me is how The Pacman bring to us excitement everytime he steps up in the ring and giving us the results most of us don't expect....and fighting a naturally bigger fighter than The Pacman... So much had been said both negative and positive about The Pacman....the thing is....Manny Pacquaio is One HELL of a Fighter that explode and deliver...not to mention his giving back what you pay for.....NO EXCHANGE NO RETURN....
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 01:21:01 PM
GOMEZ:  Cottos head is too big.. an easy target for manny, even though if cotto tries to cover up.... he will receive a few uppercuts... YES COTTO MAY HAVE FOUGHT JUDAH OR MOSLEY.... WHO WAS FAST BUT COTTO HAS NEVER FOUGHT MANNY PACQUIAO.. HE THROWS MORE PUNCHES THAN THOSE 2 OTHER GUYS AND ALSO QUICKER!!! FOR ME THIS FIGHT WILL BE PACQUIAOS 7TH BELT... COTTO IS LIKE A TURTLE COMPARED TO PACQUIAO... PACQUIAO K.O COTTO RD 5-6 MAYBE EVEN ROUND 1 :)
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 01:22:15 PM
theBLUR:  @ castro: yeah, cotto willwin over manny through lowblows and wrestling. he even employed an MMA champion to train with him. WTF! LOL!
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 01:27:30 PM
LC:  Good point Jeddah...I'm sure if people had an option or REFUND on very Floyd's fight, everyone be asking their MONEY BACK.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 01:28:46 PM
Matthew:  @GOAT. Good points about Arum having options on him. However, if Mayweather and Ellerbe are as good at negotiating as they say they are (Mayweather Promotions), if they really wanted the Margarito fight, it would have happened. I'm skeptical about that. I don't know anyone that thought Mayweather was scared of Baldomir or clamored for that fight to be made. I find it hard to believe that Tszyu didn't want to fight Mayweather; Floyd would certainly have represented his biggest payday to date. I agree that Mosley should have fought Floyd at lightweight, but do we have proof that he ducked him? Mosley's last fight at 135 was in April of '99; Floyd didn't move up to lightweight until April of 2002. They weren't both campaigning simultaneously in the same weight class, so I wouldn't really say Shane ducked him.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:05:09 PM
NANING:  Freddie Roach seems to be unusually talkative lately, professing admiration for his favorite son, calling him one of the five greatest fighters of all time. I think Roach is trying to present a happy face, a false facade. Divorce is imminent, and the feeling of animosity is mutual. When Freddie's brother died, Pacquiao obviously did not feel his pain. There was no phone call, no voice mail, no text or fax message from Pacquiao. At Baguio City, Roach was disrespected. An enduring image of Baguio City, shown in the Philboxing Forum, is a close-up photo of Pacquiao reacting to Roach when he rudely intererrupted Pacquiao's morning meeting with a politician. Pacquiao glared at Roach. His eyes fierce, he looked with utter contempt upon his hired help. How will this translate on Fight Night? Roach is a professional and will do the job he was paid to do. But what happens when the tough moment comes. What if, in Round 11, Cotto corners Pacquiao, holds him helpless against the ropes, and bangs vicious lefts and rights to his body and face? With Pacquiao's legs wobbly, his face covered with blood, and Jinky screaming from Ringside, will Roach stop the fight? Maybe he will pause, for one moment or two, or longer, to think about the past eight years. Pacquiao eight years ago, soft-spoken, humble, almost begging for his attention. And Pacquiao today, stubborn, arrogant, disdainful. Maybe Roach will watch, with tiny tears in his eyes, and a slight smile on his face. Meanwhile Cotto hammers away, with brutal, vicious lefts and rights, as he sees in Pacquiao the face of Margarito.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:16:44 PM
Matthew:  @The Saint. I am not "bent" on denying Pacquiao credit or "protecting" Cotto's legacy. While I admire and greatly respect both fighters (or any fighter that has the stones to step into the ring), I am a boxing fan first and foremost, and I remain objective when analyzing fighters. In other words, I call it like I see it, without bias (unlike the network news). I don't have a dog in the fight when it comes to the Pacquiao-Cotto fight, other than hoping to get my money's worth of action. If Pacquiao wins, I will give him due credit. Same goes for Cotto. I think Cotto will win, but if I'm wrong I will be the first to stand up and admit it. You may have missed it in my previous comment, but I stated that I already believe Pacquiao is a great fighter. That doesn't sound like I'm trying to deny Pacquiao his due. It is an inevitable fact in boxing that fighters eventually get old in a given fight. It happened to Ali, Robinson, Leonard, and countless others. I didn't give Larry Holmes any less credit when it happened to Ali in their fight. It will eventually happened to both Pacquiao and Cotto. It might happen to Cotto in this fight, or it might not. Even if it does, Pacquiao will still get full credit for winning, in my eyes.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:19:01 PM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  Who's this Saint? Puttin it down!!!
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:19:16 PM
James Haliwell:  @Jay Ari Yin: Manny Pacquiao winning against Cotto will put him in the top 15 of the all time greats list. After Cotto, if Manny wins over Mosley, he will be at least a top 10 all time great. Only in defeating Mayweather will put him at no. 5 all time great. Manny winning against Cotto, Mosley and Mayweather, in that order, will also make him the winner of a 5th ring and lineal weight class championship. Mayweather who? Can you call Mayweather Jr. on the phone and ask him why he haven't fight any welterweight champions yet?
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:20:48 PM
bossing:  i would love to see pacqiao spending time with cotto's wifey
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:27:26 PM
the good doctor:  Love the banter in this column. Strong opinions so let me jump in this. Is Manny a top 5 of all time, no. His fight record does not compare to a Sugar Ray Leonard, Ali, or Hopkins in the modern era just to name a few. However, all the titles, a great in Marquez, a formidable Cotto( if he wins), a good but not great Barrera, a good Morales twice makes him in the conversation for top 15. We also must remember that Pac's career is far from over; with PBF, Sugar Shane, and if he's really confident Williams, he can add to his legacy. As for people trying to say he may fought a washed up Cotto if he wins is absolute garbage. Anyone who has beaten Clottey, Mosley, Quintana, Judah, Torres, Corley, and Malinaggi and is 20-1 in title fights is good and if he wins Cotto becomes a great fighter. As for my prediction, anyone who knows me knows that I am a Cotto fanatic but I am also a realist. I have Pac in this one. I route hard for Cotto but he is easy to hit especially with uppercuts. Cotto is also at a severe speed disadvantage. Now some will say he beat a really fast Judah which he did but I think I am safe to say that he is not the skill of a Pac. Cotto is fast in his own right but not that fast. I think Cotto will make it interesting but I got Pac in a late round stoppage.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:27:48 PM
g dot:  @the Saint, first, with regards to Pacman vs Marquez III, if Pac is so convinced that he beat Marquez, why not fight for a third time, the first fight a "draw" marquez get's knocked down three times and then comes back to win more rounds than pacman, then in the rematch, you win a 1 point decision, when alot people thought you lost, even to this day, then instead of finishing that business, you run away from that division and start moving up to avoid a third fight... marquez has been campainging for a rematch ever since the second fight only to be denied, what's the reason(not excuse) for refusing a third fight, the money would have been there and it would've been a trilogy for the ages... but manny knows that's what would beat him, a solid boxer .... and about Mayweather not fighting Pacman right out of retirement, that would've been dumb that's like Pacman taking two years off and then jumping in with Mayweather right away... it would make no sense, and as far as picking Marquez for a fight, that was strictly a business move... but to me it's extremely funny, that before the Mayweather/Marquez fight Freddie Roach said that if Manny beats Cotto then the last two fights that Roach would want to see him in is an 8th title fight at 154 and a fight with floyd, since the may/mar fight, now coach roach said he'd be okay with Manny not fighting Floyd, why the sudden change in attitude? because he saw how bad mayweather made marquez look, and doesn't want the same for manny... the fact of the matter is floyd will win all his fights beacause he's too smart in the sqaured circle, just like Bernard when he had the Middleweight belt, Floyd knows how to make fighters fight ugly fights(by ugly i don't mean all out war) but i mean making an ugly boring fight), against Pacquiao all Mayweather will do is jab upstairs, jab downstairs, with the occasional right hand down the middle early and then as the fight goes on, he'll start leading with the right hand and bring on the left hook.... when pac tries to get close, he'll tie him up hit on the inside push away and then hit him again to create the distance... then he'll win by unanimous decision, and everyone will say floyd is a boring fighter, but he will win, because he will do whatever is necessary to secure the victory once the opponent is figured out....
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 02:44:44 PM
Money Pacman:  Manny is already one of the all time greats. Top 50 - Without a doubt. Top 25 - If he beats Cotto Top 10 - If he beats Mosley (It would be a 5th lineal belt) Top 5 - If he beats Mayweather You have to remember that it's what he has achieved not just who he has fought. He is the only 4 lineal division champ in history. And If he wins on the 14th, that's a seventh title in a seventh weight division, no one has done that as well.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 03:15:26 PM
evans:  yadago SAINT! You're the man. I seemed to be enjoying these exchanges between the saint and the rest.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 03:17:07 PM
Tae mo LC:  Guys!!!just wait for the 15th of November!!!after the fight give your comments!!!okey?Dont disappear...
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 03:20:51 PM
Robert Curtis:  Freddie Roach may be right in the long run about Manny's greatness. We've certainly seen much evidence of it already. But it is too soon to make such a pronouncement(top 5 of all time?!) or a firm comparison to Henry Armstrong. Talk to us after a fight with Money Mayweather, Freddie. Realistically, who has Manny fought at higher weights? Oscar was a has-been and Ricky was never a true great. Cotto is not so fast, but he's not an old geezer or a plugger. Miguel will bring a fight. P.S.: Marquez is no match for Manny today. Please. Don't anyone even pretend they believe that. Marquez would not last one round. A third fight would be a gift to JMM and a waste of Manny's valuable time.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 03:31:25 PM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  If I had the time I would engage in these great debates but my time is limited cause I'm pretty bz at work. @GOAT, you're wasting you're time trying to make a case for PBF's previous opponents. After he left the lightweight division he's fought nothing but B class fighters. You say that Zab was the man to beat but he lost to Baldo and he fought Baldo who in my eyes is a C class fighter. There's a logical explanation as to why he is still undefeated and if you haven't figured it out yet then I don't think you ever will. @g dot, the first fight with Marquez was no draw, judgemental error. Marquez should be greatful that a second fight was even made. Manny is whole different fighter now and if they faced off a third time it's lights out for Marquez. Many of you say that MP run out of the division when you don't know jack. Manny was struggling to make weight in the second fight and I bet you didn't even know that. I was at the Wildcard when he trained for that second fight and he had to train extra hard to cut the weight. Remember that Pac was considered a gym rat,(still is) it's because he had to train longer and start earlier for his previous bouts. After leaving 130 they stuck with 8 week training camp because he didn't have to kill himself to make the weight. I got the goods fellas, whatcha wanna know?
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 03:46:39 PM
ANUBIS:  To the people who bring up Mannys losses if you look that was pre roach era plus he was said to be weight drained and dehydrated (( I guess that only works for DLH )) as for top 5 thats up to judgement but anyonesayinghe has to be measured up to PBF is outright crazy PBF was affraid to go toe to toe with Hatton Manny killed him dont believe me look at the punch ratio between the 2 if Manny does beat Cotto dont come up with piss ass excuses both fighters are not going to He came up from 112 to fight 145 He is a talent Before he became popular no fighter really cared for him but now that he has the light they want a piece of him Manny didnt avoid anybody they just came calling when they saw a fat check
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 04:38:11 PM
WILD DICK:  Gardena LOC...I'll be seeing you Nov 14 fight night and congratulate you....if and only if....your prediction is true...
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 04:43:14 PM
manny macuha:  g dot are you insane? pacman fought juanita marquez twice, and you still claiming he's ducking marquez, oh boy you must be in other world
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 05:12:11 PM
brownsugar; ain't no mercy in the ring:  I'm not playing the rating game by co-signing those ATG comments,...but I will say he could be considered one of TODAY's TOP 5 on anybodies list if he handles Cotto on Nov 14,.. but only if you compare him with his current and immediate peers,... Wow,...eating 5 meals a day!!!! Whewww man,.. I remember pumping up in my younger days,.. and eating so much,... that I stayed on the crapper all the time it seemed,.. but once I stopped eating so much the weight fell right off like thin ice in a warm spring rain,... Pac is really putting his body thru some rigorous training,.. it's almost like science fiction,... I hope Cotto is getting ready too (his training camp looked a bit too lesiurely and luxurious on 24/7 for my tastes),.. cause the Pacman won't stomp chompin' till he's cleared the board...
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 05:12:58 PM
FUGARDENA:  I'll print your comment and smack it on your face after you Cotto sleeps on Nov14. Cotto's Jab? Well, by the time Cotto get his arm fully stretched for a jab, Manny's head slips his jab and Manny's left cross will break Cotto's nose. Death by a thousand left hands Part 2.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 05:13:10 PM
pfineman:  for the nth time we've been hearing same comment pre-fight; pacman's opponent are legit champ, bigger, stronger and better. After post fight--silence... oh by the way before annihilating hatton, ODLH and diaz, pacman was also dominant in his lower weights destroying future hall-of-famers; eric morales, ledwaba, marco antonio barrera, juan marquez... so how about it! cotto fans' name future hall of famers that cotto has beaten. i think your guy with respect if he'll be considered as a future hall-of-famer will somehow be a notable name' as one of pacman's formidable foe but got ko'd.LOL
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 05:33:53 PM
prax:  to gardenea, nothing personal but seems you really dont know what your talking about. The way you analyze has many flaws. I watched cotto and mosley fights, seems mosley doesnt prepared on the fight. no game plan, just playing inside and nothing at all. thats why cotto wins. on zab juda, he suffered so much on low blow. he cant fight normal anymore. and again cotto win.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 05:48:18 PM
mama_mia_olala:  pacman by KO in the 8rd. cotto will be blinded by pacmans fast and furious speed. i am a cotto fans aswell but i see pacman winning because other than speed he has a power in both hands, and that will hurt cotto alot and if cotto feels the power he will be confuse and the tendency he will panic and dont know what to do next.. it will be pacmans speed and power vs cottos power! pacman by KO 8rd.. marked my word!
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 06:09:23 PM
TotoyBato:  Great fight coming. Let's all watch history unfold as Manny Pacquiao Dominates and then brutally knock out Miguel Cotto. Manny Pacquiao is just there to do what he does best.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 06:19:23 PM
#1floydfan:  im going to put manny in my top 20 @ 20 cause thats all you get for choosing the easiest of the top 3 @ wws.......pacquiao had the chance to fight the top dogg and thats mosley........mosleys the man who beat the man who beat the man........not cotto.......shane mosley was willing to fight pacquiao for a 70/30 split @ any weight he wanted.......coward........if you read freddie roaches latest statement he quote cotto defense isn't good enough he's hittable........question........whos the hardest to hit and has the best D in the game huh? none other than my boy floyd money mayweather and roach knows it..........him (roach) saying floyd was the easiest of the 3 was said to steer people away from what hes realy doing..................chery picking thier way to the top.......pacs the real chery picker........no matter how many tittles this guy (pac) holds....they not going to mean $hi t once floyd gets hold of him........he'll go down in history as the man who got beat by the man
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 06:48:05 PM
Prime1:  I would'nt rate Manny at top5 all time even after he beats Cotto. For a fighter to be rated top 5 all time he would have to beat 2 fighters in their prime that can be rated at least top 30 all time. If Manny beats Cotto and Mosely in dominant fashion then he is in my top 5 all time list. If he KOs PBF Jr. then he is God send!
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 07:35:28 PM
BLUE4COR:  I'M MORE SCARED OF HATTON THAN COTTO. Hatton is way faster. The moment Cotto is hovered by Pacman's speed and power and a follow-up left hook he will freeze and fall like a log.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 08:27:41 PM
Fe'Roz :  First get the win. We can talk about greatness later.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 09:28:32 PM
rock:  Words...Let's just see who's gonna win.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:13:48 PM
Steve the hater:  By fighting at catch weight? dont think so,to be a great you need to fight young guys at your weight, not old drain Delahoya......
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 10:26:37 PM
renrhad of palompon,leyte:  manyy pacquiao is the greatest boxer of the time, better than ali, henry amrstrong, or hearns and leonard. from a flyweight to welterweight? in boxing history, no one can do that its only the pacman. everytime he fights he improved a lot and hes hungry for that. hes not yet in his prime. how much more if hes in the peak of his carrier? speed, power of both hands, superior footwork and excellent defense equals explosive fighter. no one in the entire boxing history possesses that manny pacquiao has.
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:20:29 PM
arturo:  PACMAN WILL MEET FLOYD NEXT YEAR.SO EVERYBODY SHUT THE F%&K UP AND WAIT TO SEE WHO IS BETTER
Thursday Oct 29, 2009 11:59:38 PM
Pol Canonce Barugo, Leyte Phil.:  I agree Cotto to be the toughest guy PACMAN will be facing. HE did not succumb to the Paris cast not until the late rounds. This will be a true test of PACMAN’s power if it can outshine the Plaster of Paris then Mayweather must be chilling in cowardice and hide himself in the never 50-50 purse split. PACMAN’s critics do not believe that he deserves to be in the 5 All time greats? PACMAN never say that but Roach says it and Arum says it too and the latter who happens to promote some of the 5 considered all time elite boxers. If a prospective 7 weight division ring does not ring a bell to any boxing analyst then I don’t know anymore what should be the category of all time greatness. Another thing, worldwide recognition stands also for All time greatness, PACMAN in Time Magazine as most Influential with him are top political figures like Obama, Forbes Richest Athlete with him are NBA stars KOBE, JAMES, Tiger Woods etc. what else? Just do your research and there are several other worldwide recognitions. He also cared for the humanity and environment fighting coal powered energy plants and is planning to run for an elective position here in the Phil. To serve the poor and needy.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 12:10:38 AM
Pol Canonce Barugo, Leyte Phil.:  @GARDENA LOC November 14, 2009 Main Event Scenario: 1. Cotto on the aggressive mode – He will be very busy catching the speedy train PACMAN and will be frustrated that he can not land a good clean punch against a slick and fast moving PACMAN. 2. Cotto on the counterpuncher mode – Cotto will not find PACMAN and could not throw his best signature weapon his left hook. He will again be frustrated because he can not push PACMAN to a corner and be able to deploy his arsenal.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 12:25:31 AM
Pete steward:  Manny in 6
Friday Oct 30, 2009 12:42:49 AM
lonefox96:  I'm no expert but i can't comprehend why people think that manny has to beat FMJr 1st before he is considered better than him, WHAT THE *? are they in the same weight division in the first place? Manny showed his greatness by taking risks fighting bigger opponents AFTER dominating his previous division, so even if Mayweather or Cotto for that matter beat the crap out of MP, it doesn't mean that they're greater than Pacquiao because that's what is expected of them, that's what they're are suppose to do! remember "a good big man always beat a good small man"? Wake up people, give credit to where credit is due. MP WIN OR LOOSE. God bless!
Friday Oct 30, 2009 01:30:38 AM
jim:  whynot? Pac starts from flyweight and become a champion in almost each weight division until welterweight! and he did fight the best fighter in each weight class and HE Ko'd almost all of them! I dont get u disagree-er! really, why not?????
Friday Oct 30, 2009 04:21:35 AM
brad:  @g dot, I've seen alot of top ten all-time great lists in my day, but yours is the first one I've seen with the name "LaMotta" on it. Are you kidding?
Friday Oct 30, 2009 07:05:21 AM
The Saint:  @gdot: About the 3rd fight with Marquez, Pacquiao doesn't need it. Heck, he doesn't want it, so what? The point is Marquez had two chances to obliterate Pacquiao, but he didn't and ended up getting dropped 4 times in the process. It's Marquez's problem that he can't just move on and let it be. If he feels like he truly won it, let the fans be the judge of that. It's not Pacquiao's fault that the fights got scored the way they got scored, maybe Marquez ought to pursue a fight with each of the judges instead. Marquez gives the term "celebrity stalker" a bad name. Should a 3rd fight between the two take place, it will fall under the "be careful what you wish for" category. Marquez will not only be older, but he will most likely be fighting at a weight dictated by team Pacquiao, probably around 142. Also, at this point, Pacquiao has little to gain from knocking out Marquez. Just like all other Pacquiao victories, it will most likely be attributed to Marquez being bloated or being past his prime. Plus I'm sure Mayweather will be quick to take credit for it. Dude likes to reap the benefits of other people's work. About Mayweather not fighting Pacquiao out of retirement, I have 3 words to say to that; Sugar Ray Leonard. As I've already said, a TRUE great fighter like Leonard came off a 3-year retirement, MOVED UP in weight and fought the world's best and most feared middleweight in Marvin Hagler. If Leonard did it Mayweather's way, he would've coaxed Alexis Arguello to move up to super welterweight to fight him. The "fact of the matter" is that Floyd will win all his fights because he will NEVER fight Pacquiao, Paul Williams, Shane Mosley and Miguel Cotto. I'm not here to argue on who would win between Mayweather and any of these guys, because unless they step into the ring against each other, we'll never know. And guess what? We'll never know because Mayweather does not want to fight any of them. You can run your mouth all day long on how Mayweather would beat any of those fighters, but at the end of the day, it's meaningless because the fights will never take place. "He would do this, he would do that, and then this, and then that, blah blah blah." I say let's see him DO IT. Mayweather fans are content to give Mayweather FULL credit for HYPOTHETICAL victories. I don't live in fantasyland, I want to see the actual fights happen.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 07:37:13 AM
bowery's pride:  pacquiao in 3. speed kills and cotto's heart is not in it any more. top 5 all-time: monzon, arguello, zarate, mancini, howard davis and mickey goodwin. that's my top 5.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 09:17:38 AM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  Saint is reminding me of an up and comer prospect MisterLee. Prospect who came out of nowhere and suddenly made his mark in this Universe. Hope you here to stay Saint. @Steve the Hater, what about Floyd with his catchweight fight? I would say that's 10x worse than taking Cotto a pound under his normal weigh in. @floydfan, again what about Floyd choosing a bloated canvas kisser. I would say that has to be the easiest fight for a welterweight fighting today. Mosley will get his chance now that we all know Floyd has no interest going back in the ring. Line up one by one, Cotto, Mosley, Marquez, is there anyone else? Floyd? He don't want none.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 09:17:59 AM
bowery's pride:  but mosely KO's them both. cotto has no more heaert or toughness to tackle mosely THE WORLD WELTERWEIGHT CHAMPION again. and manny is too small to take the champ's punches
Friday Oct 30, 2009 09:21:08 AM
bowery's pride:  the Saint is right about Mayweather. only he wouldn't coax the retired arguello if he was leanard, but the featherweight pedroza pedroza
Friday Oct 30, 2009 09:23:53 AM
bowery's pride:  the Saint is right about Mayweather. only he wouldn't coax the retired arguello if he was leanard, but the featherweight pedroza pedroza
Friday Oct 30, 2009 09:31:23 AM
#1floydfan:  You 're starting to sound like a lil kid...i want i want i want.......i want floyd to fight pacquiao, cotto, mosley, williams, this person, that person on and on and on......when will you be satisfied? i dont see anyone lining up matches for pacquiao like people do floyd...why is that? is he (floyd) not a 6 time champion in 5 diferent weight classes.....he dont need to do nothing....btw pacfan it wasn't floyd who put marquez in the top 2 P4P so if floyd happend to make it look easy maybe marquez shouln't of been there in the first place........Coming in 2lb heavier is = to draining an opponent of 2lb theres realy no diference..........oh and another thing it took you're boy Pac 24 hard fought rounds to beat that canvas kisser
Friday Oct 30, 2009 02:49:53 PM
David Churchwell:  That's the best part of this fight; it's captivating the interest of everyone in the boxing world, and no small part of the sporting community outside of it. I'm a fan of both men, having followed their careers for the past ten years, and it's difficult to pick a winner. I think the devotees who are so sure of victory are overlooking a very real possibility. Some say that Cotto's power will prove to be too much and Pac will be stopped early on; others say Pac's speed will overwhelm Cotto. As a true boxing fan, I see the chance to transcend the promotional hype that goes into the modern boxing event and have one of the explosive and dramatic bouts that reminds us all why we love the sport. I see not a one-sided beat down, but a vigorous back-and-forth battle filled with all of the courage, skill, and bloody sacrifice that we can handle. I'd be be surprised if it was anything less.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 02:58:45 PM
David:  And am I the only one that gets really irritated when fighters talk about the next possible match-up when they haven't even won the one scheduled three weeks later? Not only does it stink of arrogance, but it also reveals the possibility that they are not taking their next opponent seriously. If there is any crack in Pacman's armor, it's him and Roach constantly talking about fighting Mayweather next year. That's a strong indicator that they're not as focused as they should be on Cotto. Meanwhile, Cotto has kept his usual stoicism and single-minded fixation on November 14th. That's the only wrinkle I see in this whole affair, catch-weights and Margarito's ghost and Philippine typhoons notwithstanding.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 03:13:33 PM
The Saint:  @#1floydfan: I guess you're perfectly satisfied with Mayweather fighting stiffs. Let me ask you this. Who do YOU want Mayweather to fight next? Who do you think is "worthy" to fight Mayweather? People are "lining up" to fight Floyd because out of the so called elite, he's the smallest risk. As a welterweight, he's relatively small and doesn't punch hard enough to bust a grape. He hit Marquez with every punch in the book and Marquez didn't go anywhere (remember Floyd Sr. bragging about how if PBF were to drop Marquez, Marquez wouldn't be getting up? LOL) The best Mayweather could do against a legitimate welterweight is box circles around him. Fighters aren't afraid to get outboxed. Mayweather is an excellent fighter, but other fighters aren't afraid of him because he can't hurt them. REAL boxing fans will be satisfied IF Mayweather decides to ever step into the ring with the top welterweights. You talk as though Mayweather has fought them all. He's been a welterweight for several years and has yet to fight one of the elite. And the issue of Mayweather coming "2 lbs heavier" is not just the 2 pounds. There's a reason they agreed to a catchweight. Marquez is losing some speed by adding 10 lbs, not to mention being at a strength disadvantage against a naturally larger opponent. By Mayweather agreeing to cut down to 144, at least theoretically, he will lose some strength as a result of having to lose more weight than his body is accustomed to, thus leveling the playing field a bit. Perhaps it wouldn't have made a difference in the outcome of the fight even if Mayweather made 144, but the question is, would Marquez have even agreed to fight Mayweather in the first place had Mayweather been up front about coming in above 144? Also, Mayweather wouldn't even allow himself to be weighed on fight night, and who knows how much weight he put on since the weigh in? What Mayweather did is just as dangerous as Margarito's alleged illegal handwraps. We saw what happened when Arturo Gatti came in at around 160 on fight night against the much smaller Joey Gamache. Something similar could've happened to Marquez, but lucky for Marquez, his grandmother hits harder than Mayweather.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 03:16:43 PM
karl:  manny pacquiao will win i know that because he works hard in his training and miguel cotto will get ko by 4 round
Friday Oct 30, 2009 03:34:33 PM
The Saint:  @David Churchwell: I'm one of the biggest Pacquiao fans out there, but I'm always nervous for him because I don't trust his chin. I saw him fight for the first time on the Tyson-Lewis undercard and have been following his career since. I haven't seen him seriously hurt or wobbled since I've been watching him, and he has taken some good shots against decent punchers. I shouldn't have any reason to doubt his chin, but I can't erase the image of Pacquiao getting stretched out by a single punch when he was a flyweight, from a video I saw at YouTube. I know it's been a decade and he has matured physically and doesn't have to drain himself to make weight anymore, but still. The way I see the Cotto fight, it's either Pacquiao dominates from start to finish or stops Cotto early. or Cotto stopping Pacquiao early. I just don't see a back and forth battle because I don't think Pacquiao will be able to survive a steady flow of punishment from Cotto. I think that if Cotto starts getting to Pacquiao and starts hurting him, that it won't take long for Cotto to finish the job. I love Pac but I'm a realist. He's not a true welterweight and Cotto is one of the strongest welters out there. I don't believe that Pacquiao has the frame to absorb heavy shots from Cotto on a regular basis. It's just plain physics. However, I do think that it's highly probable that Pacquiao's speed will spell the difference and that he has the power and precision to catch Cotto cleanly and hurt him. Pacquiao needs to fight the perfect fight, but I think that the "perfect fight" for Pacquiao isn't anything out of the ordinary for him.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 03:40:37 PM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  @floydfan, Marquez maybe the #2 p4p but how is he ranked in the Welterweight division? That's where they met at didn't they? I could understand if May did that to Marquez at 130 but he didn't. I explained this a while back already. So you're saying that if Calderon who is a flyweight and is the #2 in the p4p, does that give May the go ahead to face him? The p4p does not give a fighter rights to fight another and get full credit if they're not in the same division. Those rankings is based on how a fighter performs while moving up. Didn't you know that? Fighters have always been lined up for Floyd but he still hasn't face a single one. Experts don't do that to Pac because he picks the right opponents. Other than many wanting Pac to fight Marquez for a third time all of his recent opponents have been fairly good. You can't compare Pac's fights with Marquez to Floyd's. Marquez fought Pac at his comfortable weight while Floyd fought a bloated and slower Marquez. Big difference there, you have to arguments on Floyd because it just backfires on you.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 03:44:04 PM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  @Saint, I think the only time I've seen Manny hurt was when he got hit by Solis with an uppercut and he backed off. But it didn't take long for him to recover. That's what I love about Pac is when he's hurt he just presses forward like the old greats used to do. I'm with you on that it can go early either way. Manny is a great boxer but he isn't facing Dela Hoya who is not as relentless as Cotto. Freddie is playing mind games with Cotto by him saying that he hopes Cotto comes out banging. I think Freddie is ready for whatever Cotto brings. But the truth is that Freddie hopes that Cotto plays the counter puncher in the fight. Which is why he brought in Porter who is quicker than Cotto. They also made a great pick on bringing Castillo who will bring aggression in the sparring if Cotto comes out aggressive. Freddie is more focus on Pac power and is the key with his straight left.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 03:56:18 PM
#1floydfan:  Nah nah nah check the tape again marquez rocked pacquiao......watch his legs closely they almost turned to jelly lol.......its funny how you included those 2 years he (floyd) took off but i wouldn't expect anything less from a hatter like you (saint).......i have absolutely no doubt marquez would of taken the fight even if floyd was a super middle weight......you know what they say don't you? power doesn't win fights skill wins fights.............hey yo pacfan......still buming over how floyd toasted up marquez huh? lol.......get over it man looks like theres a new #1pacfan and it aint you my friend
Friday Oct 30, 2009 05:16:36 PM
FLHurricane:  Can't wait for the Cotto/Pac fight!! I'll be rooting for Cotto fight night but it'll be a tough fight against one of the greatest of all time.Ya i'll give my respect to the Pacman. He's a true warrior just like my man Cotto. And reading through all these comments.. it sounds like all these floyd fans are just ignorant and in denial. Maybe they're just jealous because Floyd isn't even considered to be one of the greatest. His undeafeated record is the most meaningless. Let's see.. his greatest win is against a 36 year-old bloated lightweight and needed an extra 2lbs fight night. haha At least Marquez was an A-class fighter.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 05:53:43 PM
RED:  With all due respect to those who believe Manny can change water into wine or part the Red sea, GET REAL. Manny could beat Cotto before they shout "seconds out" and he would not be in the top 20 fighters of the modern era. The fact we're having this discussion is absurd to the point of laughter. I think some folks here desperately need a hero. Manny better than in their prime Leonard, Hagler, Arguello, Duran, Chavez, Whittaker? Lmao! He's been stopped twice in his career by less than remarkable opponents. He beat an over the hill De la Hoya. Juan M. Marquez gave him fits. Basically, he's a great fighter that today remains great...not the best of the generation. Indeed, not even close.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 06:20:41 PM
#1floydfan:  hey flhurricane how can you're man cotto be considered great when no ones even heard of him? he (cotto) is only taking this fight to get more exposure and a nice big fat payday cause he aint been doing too well with his ppv numbers....you hit it right on the button when you said marquez WAS an A lister.......but after what i witness between him and floyd it looked more like C class to me....you cab argue about the 2lb all you want but deep down you know it would'nt of made no difference even if they where the same
Friday Oct 30, 2009 07:02:53 PM
Frank Z@dr3r42:  Yeah but langford did fight some legitly big men and beat some of them in his day like harry wills and jack johnson, battling jim johnson. i do agree that people from that era tend to rank their best guys ahead of today's but we're at fault for that too, a lot of people have roy jones jr. rated much higher and floyd too. even this article points to freddie roach talking like he's a little struck with hyperbole. The reason i tend to lean with the people who think that the older time fighters are better is because those guys fought so much more often, and they were more single mindedly dedicated to boxing. you can make the argument that today's fighters are bigger and stronger, but i don't think that's really the case either, cause the weight classes negate a lot of the bigger aspect, and even though the nutrition knowledge is better today, most of the fighters have to drain down to their weight becuase the weight classes are so rigid and numerous now, instead of fighting at their natural weight andcoming up with strategy and skill to overcome any reach and size disadvantage that they have. everytime i watch old film i notice a couple of things, first that the old era fighters were much better balanced than most of today's , and that they wasted much less motion. i think these are signs of superior skill.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 07:28:06 PM
The Saint:  @#1floydfan: You didn't answer my question. You're more elusive than Mayweather is OUTSIDE the ring. LOL. Who do YOU want to see Mayweather fight next? Who SHOULD Mayweather fight next? We all know that you'd love for him to fight Chris John next , maybe Rocky Juarez, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt LOL.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 09:18:43 PM
Isaiah@#!floydfan:  The truth hurts doesn't it man? The same Marquez who was an awesome Feather, Jr. Light and Lightweight is not the same guy at Welterweight. As great as Marquez is, he can't beat one elite Welter because his body type isn't built the same as Manny Pacquiao who can move up in weight more efficiently. Read this carefully. Marquez's body cannot truly handle beyond Lightweight and Manny might not be able to handle Welter properly. We'll see. I'm a fair man, so I'll say that Oscar losing to Manny at Welter is not the same Aas Floyd barely scraping by him at JuniorMiddle. Still regardless, Manny beat Oscar way more convingly and Oscar offers no exscuses. He knows he couldn't make the weight comfortably anymore. Manny also destroyed Ricky Hatton much easier to then Floyd and there are no legit exscuses on that one. That was Ricky at 140, not a bloated 147. Face it, your boy is IS and always WILL BE a COWARD!!! Manny is made of steel. Floyd is made of marshmallow. Read this. Floyd WILL lose and it will be awesome! I'll take a guy with skills that has a loss on him, but gives the fans the fights they want to see then Floyd Mayweather, anyday. Can't remeber who's quote this is but, "I'd rather be a Tiger for 2 days, then a sheep for 200 years.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 09:46:34 PM
Fe'Roz :  Attention all fight fans. Trick or treating has started early. If you all want a treat after a hard week's work, check out the youtube interview with Floyd and The Rapper R.A. :the Rugged Man. We can talk later....after you hear it.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 10:31:48 PM
#1floydfan:  Who do you think i want next? pacquiao of corse but i dont know if cottos going to let that happen.....so well take either ither...hell @#$% that well take em all.....shane mosley, margarito line em all up......floyds gotta 5 fight deal with golden boy and they all on the hit list.........you just got to stop being so impatient floyd can only fight one @ a time.......yea marquez was an awsome lightweight but......so was floyd
Friday Oct 30, 2009 10:54:37 PM
Frank Z@#1floydfan:  dude i want floyd to cement his legacy as an all timer as much as anybody, but you gotta ask yourself man, why does he never say that he'll fight anybody until someone challenges him and pushes him on his choice of opponents? and why show unnecessary disrespect to potential opponents and try to discredit them, such as mosley with steroids and paul williams getting beat by quintana? when you have a reputation as a ducker and dodger, you have to disprove it by action or at least the intention of action, if he would just come out and say "all roads lead to me, whoever wants it can come talk to leonard, i'm my own boss so if your boss is willing and it makes money sense let's do it." stop pushing the same bs about being undefeated and beingn rich. if being undefeated meant something then joe calzaghe's better than him, if being rich meant something bill gates can KO vitali klitschko, his brother wladamir, and a prime muhammad ali all in one night.
Friday Oct 30, 2009 10:58:18 PM
Mexicutioner::  Here is my top five greatest fighters of all time: 1. Sugar Ray Robinson 2.Muhammad Ali 3. Manny Pacquiao- Still needs to beat Cotto. 4. Henry Armstrong 5.Roberto Duran 150. Julio Cesar Chavez Sr- I have to put him to this position because he had tremendous questionable win against Taylor and Whitaker. LOL
Friday Oct 30, 2009 11:20:12 PM
Isaiah:  Amazing all that money and Bill Gates still can't afford a decent hair cut. HA! Anyway, give Joe Calzaghe some credit. At least he finished his career with some good fights. Wins over Jeff Lacy, Sakio Bika and Peter Manfredo Jr. is decent. Win over older Roy Jr. is good and wins over Bernard Hopkins and Mikkel Kessler is great. I have no cripes about joe. Anyway, yey, Floyd may have been a great Lightweight, but he's been a Welter since late 2005. NUFF SAID!!!
Friday Oct 30, 2009 11:32:32 PM
#1floydfan:  dude im not trying to deny floyds hand picked a few opponents but dosen't everybody? pacquiao could of fought mosley but chose cotto instead.......no body brings that up.......floyd called out mosley way back in 96 but instead mosley moved up in weight to challege delahoya now all of a sudden floyds the ducker.......im not saying hes the best cause he's undefeated but surely his 40 and 0 counts for something.......all im saying is if he picked his nuts up he can take these dudes.....well maybe not all but pac and cotto fo sho
Friday Oct 30, 2009 11:43:03 PM
Isaiah@#1floydfan:  Hey dude. Floyd turned pro in 1996. He didn't call Mosley out until 1999. What the Mayweather fans neglet to mention is that, Mosley was much heavier then Floyd at the time and Mosley doesn't fight guys that are lighter then him, maybe naturally heavier, (Vargas and Wright come to mind) but not lighter. In 2006, when Floyd mentioned Mosley's name, Mosley said the thing about his tooth and wanting to spend some time with his family. Mosley DID say though that a 2007 fight with Mayweather would be good though. That's what some people fail to mention. If you want to chastise Mosley for taking a few months off to be on vacation with his family, then why don't you say something about Mayweather taking 21 months off? There is no double standard! For example, Bernard Hopkins has over a year off and he's going to take a tuneup fight. I think that's fine. Now then, Floyd has had his tuneup fight, (Please don't give me the exscuse about Marquez being elite, as a Welterweight, HE IS NOT!!!) so now it's time to put up against the best guys his own size, or STFU! By the way, are you insinuating that Pacquiao's first "REAL" fight at Welter in choosing Cotto instead of Mosley is some kind of Cherry picking? Are we talking about the same Cotto who I consider still in his prime? Is this the same Cotto who's in the top 3 Welter's in the world, who has 1 questionable loss, who BEAT Shane Mosley? Have you taken a look at Cotto's resume? Pacquiao is the man to! Have you seen his resume?!! You have no leg to stand on! I just heard that interview the Rapper R.A. the Rugged Man had with your guy Floyd, BEST INTERVIEW EVER!!!!!!!!! Fake ole Floyd don't want none! Let me clear something up to. When your Welterweight resume consits of trialhorse Sharmbra Mitchell, Zab Judah (Right after he lost to Baldomir. REAL BRAVE FLOYD) Carlos Baldomir and Ricky Hatton and now Marquez. (Really? Where was Floyd when Cotto was ready for him in 2007?) To anwser your, "I'm not saying he's the best cause he's undefeated but surely his 40 and 0 counts for something..." the Rapper RA: the Rugged Man said it best when he said, "I could be undefeated and 40-0 to if I fought 40 girls in a row! After Jose Luis Castillo, Floyd's done NOTHING!!! Since 2002 buddy! Floyd's done nothing! Since 2003, I can think of 2 so called tuneup fights that Pacquiao has had (Jorge Solis and David Diaz) and Solis stunned him! Besides that, Pacquiao has fought everyone and only lost barely once to Erik Morales the first time. Listen to the interview. Floyd has no leg to stand on. "Well Pacquiao was knocked out twice" (Yey, as a teenager...) Exscuses! That should mean Floyd beats him easily right? So, MAN UP!!! Like RA said, "yey everybody has a loss because they fight eachother while you wait for the leftovers," or something like that. Floyd said well, Sugar Ray Leonard was knocked out, (Yey, in his last fight against Hector Camacho, at 40, at LightHeavyweight! ) At least Sugar dared to be great and is great! Coward Mayweather doesn't get a penny more of my money unless he grows a pair.
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 02:03:57 AM
#1floydfan:  oh mosley doesn't fight guys lighter than him then why the hell was he calling out pacquiao? mosley could've strait up said yes but didn't......theres a big diference between vacation and retirement.....and yup i have seen cottos resume...zab juda hell anyone whos anyone got zab juda......but like i said before ^ shane mosleys the man who beat the man who smashed cotto....as far as im concerned shane mosleys the top dawg......i cheacked out pacquiaos resume too not impressed......forget them other names delahoya and hatton where the ones who put him on the map.......i never realy thought much of hatton and oscar.....oscar omg......whos fighting whos leftovers here? oh and you can keep you're money cause weather you like it or not floyds ppv numbers are going to continue to climb haaaaaa
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 02:40:27 AM
#1floydfan:  its realy pointless you arguing with me cause where im from loyalty is paramount....but chears for the article i cant belive you did all that just for me haaa......so its 99 i'll keep that inmind lol that rhymes
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 03:03:09 AM
Isaiah:  I'm fiercly loyal to a friend or likeable fighter, but my loyality will not blind me to the truth and if they do something I don't like, you better believe I'll call them on it! There's loyality and there's stupidity. I don't care who you are. I wouldn't let anyone play me for a fool and buddy, Floyd is playing his fans for fools! Floyd is counting on you certain people to buy any piece of garbage he throws out. I prefer to THINIK about what I do. Last I check by the way, Marquez was Pacquiao's leftover if you want to bring that up. I guess the part of Pacquiao's resume involving 3 fights with Erik Morales, 2 with Marco Antonio Barrera and 2 with Juan Manuel Marquez don't count to you, eh? Well, I don't count any of Floyd's resume before Castillo then! Hmm, what do you know? Floyd's resume is garbage.
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 04:10:51 AM
Isaiah:  By the way, at least Shane Mosley doesn't have you come up from Lightweight to fight him at an agreed 144 pounds and then Mosley gains 2 pounds over that because he's a cheater. Before you go there, test him for steroids before you fight him if you think he is and call off the fight if he is. Simple as that. Mosley could and would meet Manny at any weight he chooses and STILL beat him down. Don't give me that Floyd is a bigger attraction stuff. If Floyd is super rich like he says he is and is fighting for legacy like he says he is, then there should be no problem in making these fights happen NOW! The true fans don't care about the exscuses of the past anymore. That's OLD news. Floyd is surrounded by challenges, but he has a million exscuses for each one. "This is a bussiness and I need to make money, blah,blah,blah..." I thought Floyd was rich and looks like to me he's making multi millions no matter who he chooses next, so cut the BULL!!! Mosley,Pacquiao,Cotto,Paul Williams, (If Marquez can fight Mayweather, why can't Mayweather fight Paul Williams... Oh that's right... cause you know Mayweather would get WHOOPED!!!) Joshua Clottey, Andre Berto... What a Welterweight class we have today!!! Let the exscuses fly!!!
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 04:28:12 AM
Marco Polo:  name 1 boxer who started from flyweight without any massive or any amateur experience and now fighting 1 of the best fighter in welterweight?hmmm. 1.Manny Pacquiao 2. ?????? 3.???????
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 11:18:54 AM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  @floydfan, there are millions of "PacFans" all over, I'm the #1 in my own right. I can care less about Floyd's last mismatch because it didn't mean a thing to the boxing world. Just another tune up fight and a robbery. I'm so glad I skipped that to watch UFC. Marquez is an A class fighter but in the Welterweight division, I rate him a C class fighter. Collazo would've beat the crap out of Marquez that night. @Fe'Roz, that was some funny @ss interview. All that B.S. he's been saying is coming back to haunt him. Remember the Kenny interview, he said he wouldn't fight Mosley because he has 5 losses. Why didn't the rapper mention that when they were talking about Baldomir who had way more losses. I wish I could interview this Fraud, he would be stuttering like a mofu.
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 11:27:16 AM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  And you can't blame Pacquiao for all of the sudden not interested in Mosley because when the word was out that Mosley wanted Pac, Pac immediately accepted without Arum's consent of course. Don't worry Pac will be promoting himself soon, he'll show Floyd how its done.
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 11:31:05 AM
Frank Z @ #1 Pacfan:  Nah pac's probably gonna be done with boxing by the end of 2010, the way he fights it's hard to imagine him continuing into his mid 30s.... though he's improved pretty late in his career so who knows. either way, i don't think it's picking on a small guy as much with mosley calling pac out, because 1. pac's shown he can bang with big boys, and 2. shane was willing to weight drain down to 140, which is looking like is pac's prime weight class now that his body's fully thickened and matured. i'm going to keep my mind open on floyd being able to turn his reputation around though, marquez was his tuneup fight, and he DID look great from being off so long, but i've said this before, what excuses does he have left now? people were calling him to fight the elite welters since early 2008 at least, and he decided to retire for reasons i'll respect even though we don't know for sure why, but now that he's back, with a 5 fight deal signed, who can he really fill in his remaining four fights that don't include sugar shane, miguel cotto, joshua clottey, paul williams, andre berto? can you name me a high level welterweight who's not any one of those cats?
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 01:01:59 PM
#1 PacFan "KO's Cotto in 7":  @Frank Z, I don't think a lot of people know this but May stated before announcing his comeback that he was always in shape and in the gym while being retired. So that 2 year layoff wasn't really a big deal to me. I think he was training on the down low in my opinion and waiting for the right time to come back. Eventually the public is going to push May to edge to fight the true competetion. There has been a lot of bashing regarding Mayweather's career and he has to just take on those guys or retire for good. That's the only way me and all of his critics would stop talking about him. Didn't you hear? Floyd was interested in fighting a 19 year Welterweight prospect from Mexico who is undefeated but untested.
Saturday Oct 31, 2009 03:42:31 PM
Isaiah:  SAUL ALVAREZ? NUFF SAID!!!
Sunday Nov 1, 2009 02:27:51 PM
The Saint:  Has anyone heard this talk radio (Shade 45) debate Mayweather got spanked in? It's hilarious, Mayweather proved he got no class and R.A. the Rugged Man completely EXPOSED him. This website doesn't allow the posting of url, so do a google search on "mayweather talk radio" and you'll see what I'm talking about.lol
Sunday Nov 1, 2009 04:12:34 PM
sane:  cotto win by knockout
Saturday Nov 7, 2009 02:50:11 PM

Name: Email:  (will not be displayed, TSS Privacy, your email is required to autoapprove your comment)

Please be respectful, and do not use foul language in your comment

Discuss this article in the forum

  THESWEETSCIENCE.COM   More from the Top Team of Writers in the Fight Game ...
 
More from this Writer
Columns by Michael Woods
 
Recent boxing Columns and News
•  Today We Will See How Ward Handles The Moment by Ron Borges
•  Hopkins Comes Full Circle And Gives Back by Frank Lotierzo
•  Andre Ward Vs. Mikkel Kessler On Saturday by David A. Avila
•  Pacquiao-Cotto Did 1.25 Million PPV Buys
•  PREDICTION PAGE: Dirrell Picks Ward, Taylor Hedges, Euros Go With Kessler
 
 


TSS Video
Freddie Roach talking about Amir Khan, Salita and Mayweather
  
Manny Pacquiao with Roach pt. 3
  
Miguel Cotto pt. 1
  
More Video
TSS Photo Archive

2009 Reader Of The Year Weighs In On Legacies Of Pacquiao And Mayweather
"Pacquiao has proven....in the ring... time and time again that he is the greatest of this time. He has earned his respect. He begs for nothing. He is a man content with his growth, his family and his achievements. A man the world has now turned it's eyes to behold. Floyd Mayweather is not even close in stature. He may possess the greatest skills but he is not the Face of Boxing today. Google Manny Pacquiao. There are 20 million searches. Google Floyd. There are 6.5 million. Look at the NYTimes, the Wall Street Journal and Time. Count how many words were used these past years to mention Floyd Mayweather. Then count the words still being printed about Manny. And keep counting. As I've said many times, Floyd has been too clever by half. He has short changed his public.....and has out-smarted himself. Manny will fight but a few more times. Enjoy it while you can. He is an all time great pugilist. Floyd, with all of his remarkable skills lack the will to be truly great in the biggest sense of the word. His legacy will look more like Holmes that Ali. He has earned it." ---November is half-way gone, but we don't need to keep counting ballots. It's a landslide. Fe'Roz has won the 2009 Reader of the Year award. His comments add to the website immeasurably, and he epitomizes the thoughtful, respectful, educated fan of pugilism we strive to cater to at TSS. Congrats, Fe'Roz, and please accept my thanks for being the valued member of this community that you are. Sincerely, Editor Mike

Round by Round Coverage
Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto
Fight aficionados, tune in for live, round by round coverage of the Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto welterweight championship on Saturday, November 14th beginning at 9 pm ET / 6 pm PT.

The Sweet Science Writers
The Sweet Science
Legal  | Privacy  |  Sitemap  |  Disclaimer  |  The Savage Science © 2004-2007 The Sweet Science Boxing.  All rights reserved. .