|
 |
|
| F-Lo was unimpressed, big-time, by the Froch-Dirrell bout. They looked like prelim guys to F-Lo... |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
 |
Hard Hitting On Froch-Dirrell
By Frank Lotierzo
It’s too bad that Showtime’s Super Six tournament doesn’t have a provision for getting rid of fighters—regardless whether they win, lose, or draw—who are so terrible that they don’t belong among the super middleweight elite. If such a provision were written into the contracts, we’d never have to watch either Carl Froch or Andre Dirrell fight again. I know that after Saturday night’s fight, I’m dreading their next appearances. They're both inexperienced and have no shot to win the tournament.
Where did Froch earn the reputation as someone who could fight at the upper-tier level? Aside from fouling and mauling, he didn’t show me a thing. He may have the heart of a fighter, but none of the corresponding skill. He's slow, and seems to rely on one not very powerful punch at a time. He’s not bad at clubbing on the back of the neck, but his opponent--as Froch himself mentioned in his post-fight interview--made that a little easier for him by obligingly tying up, lowering his head, and turning away. Saturday’s fight exposed a lot about how limited Froch is. It’s hard to imagine anyone outside of Nottingham still being a Believer.
Athleticism aside, is there anything about Andre Dirrell that indicates he can fight at the main event level? He jumps around, runs away, switches stances aimlessly between orthodox and southpaw, and throws arm punches with no plan whatsoever, only fighting in the specific moment fate happens to place him. If Froch can be credited with at least having a fighter’s heart, Dirrell hasn’t even earned that distinction. He was totally uninvolved at the end of the fight, saying exactly the same things he’d say before it, (“I worked my ass off. I went the extra yard.”) Worked your ass off for what? Went the extra yard where?
Who should have been given the decision in Saturday's fight? Who cares? Both guys looked like six round prelim fighters. That impression was reinforced by the competency and professionalism shown by both Jermain Taylor - even though he needs to retire now and not continue on in the tournament and - Arthur Abraham in the night’s earlier bout.
Think of Arthur Abraham’s methodically executed fight plan against Jermain Taylor. Until the last fifteen seconds of the fight, he didn’t have a spectacular night, but that’s not important. Compare the long range vision that he had for his bout, along with the implementation of that vision, to the amateurish flailing and useless movement that Froch and Dirrell engaged in.
Froch, the limited brawler that he is, wants his opponent to fight him on his terms. That’d definitely work in a bar fight, but in professional boxing there are a lot of alternative ways to fight and win. Engaging and mixing with a roughhouse fighter at his own game (unless you’re better at it than he is a la Robert Duran or Julio Cesar Chavez) isn’t manly, it’s stupid. Incidentally, although Froch will welcome a fight against an opponent who’ll fight and go toe to toe with him, there are guys in the super middleweight division, two of whom happen to be in the super-six tournament, who’d be too much for Froch to handle and cope with.
Another observation from Saturday night was Andre Dirrell's corner. Showtime has been going on about how Andre Dirrell and his older brother Anthony were raised by their grandfather Leon Lawson, and how he took them from the streets where they were heading toward bad ends, brought them into a boxing gym, and taught them to fight. Except that he didn’t teach them to fight. I'm sure Mr. Lawson is a a decent man. But if Andre Dirrell is to have any chance at all to develop into a real fighter, he needs to have a real trainer in his corner. In a situation where there’s a lot of money on the line (not to mention each fighter’s reputation), it was frustrating to see a fighter lose a fight he easily could have won but for lack of a sound fight plan and a brief lecture about the perils of fighting in the other guy’s neighborhood.
So Saturday’s reward for Carl Froch will be two points (non-kayo winners get this) and a sure beating at the hands of Mikkel Kessler in his next fight. Andre Ward doesn’t get the points, of course. But he’ll surely receive the beating; his next opponent will be Arthur Abraham.
When this tournament was announced it seemed like a terrific idea. Getting the best of the best together in boxing is a welcome change. After watching it's maiden fights the point system doesn't seem right for boxing. Points are for team sports. Boxing is determined by who beats whom.
Frank Lotierzo can be contacted at GlovedFist@Gmail.com
|
Frank Z:
|
F-Lo, I do have to agree with your main analysis, which is that both dirrell and froch fought like amateurs. The point that I have to argue on though is that I would like to see dirrell fight again, to see how much he can improve from being in that kind of experience, a hostile crowd, being in there with someone who can hit if he needs to, etc. I've said from the beginning though Froch's style is extremely eyesore, although he has slightly more skill than i first gave him credit for, which was none. dirrell did adjust as the fight went on, and his attitude towards the fight did change. you are right though, he does need to see an established pro trainer. his grandpa taught him how to box in an amateur style, which was good enough for him to beat a cuban and receive a bronze, but sadly olympic boxing's gotten too different from the pros. dirrel's only 26, dude's got a couple of more years before he reaches his prime, but he needs to start polishing up now, cause I think if he does he can reach roy jones level of dominance. he should stick to orthodox also imo, he hurt froch the most from that stance. the switch hitting is not fun to watch and it's gonna square him up to get caught, esp by a patient hard punching dude like abraham.
Tuesday Oct 20, 2009 08:31:07 PM
|
|
dr3r42:
|
Good points Frank Z, Dirrell does have athletic ability that can't be taught. But like F-Lo and others have pointed out (Kenny Weldon) hand and footspeed can be negated at championship level. If he doesn't change trainers (which I doubt he will) than he'll never really improve. The old addage of going from a 3 round amatuer fighter to a 12 round amatuer fighter will apply. Even a change of trainers would take time for him to improve, and he's locked into fighting again in 3 months (not sure if it will be JT or Allan Green, or Miranda).
Tuesday Oct 20, 2009 09:05:18 PM
|
|
dr3r42:
|
I am not as gung-ho on Abraham as F-Lo is. Yeah, he'll destroy Froch, who will be made to order for him, but I think Kessler will beat AA. Abraham's problem is that he's a slow starter in a 12 round fight era. He often gives away the early rounds or can lose them if a guy like Kessler (especially like Calzaghe) who could steal them. If AA falls behind 4 rounds to 1, or 5-1 early in the fight than he's in trouble agaisnt Kessler. It's not like he has out of this world power, nor is AA a pressure fighter like Frazier, Pryor or even Margarito, where the opponent has to fight his a$$ off just to keep him off him. AA fights with a measured pace, concentrating on defense early in the fight. That may be a good style in a 15 round fight, but 12 rounds is a huge difference from 15, especially for a guy like AA. Kind of like Paul Williams-Margarito, where Williams had a 5-1 lead at the mid point- all he needs is one more for the draw and two more rounds for the win. I think against a pro like Kessler, that's a lot to overcome.
Tuesday Oct 20, 2009 09:14:33 PM
|
|
Isaiah:
|
I know I'm catching heck for this, but after reviewing the fight I have Froch winning this fight, by one point. Six rounds a piece was fair and with Dirrell getting deducted one point, Froch edges out the win. To be fair, Froch should have also lost a point and it shoud have been a draw, but a Froch win is within reason. It doesn't matter much, since like I said from the beginning, Kessler is winning this thing hands down. Bring on Ward, Froch, Abraham or anybody else. Kessler reigns supreme in the end!
Tuesday Oct 20, 2009 10:37:45 PM
|
|
RG - ______sense:
|
Froch fights like a novice amateur, who will never improve. This dude should go and join MMA/UFC. SOG is going to whup Kessler worst than Slappy Joe Calzaghe whup that arse. Superfightwriter F-Lo is right. This Super Six is -- in my opinion -- going to be a coming out party for SOG. He aims to show the ___how to conduct the sweet science. Holla!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 12:32:55 AM
|
|
gibola:
|
Froch has an awkward, ugly style but steady on guys - he comes to fight and a lot of decent fighters have failed to beat him. Styles make fights and this fight was a horrible matchup from day one.
Instead of focusing on Froch's limitations ask yourself how a so-called excellent 'boxer' finds himself in a world title fight then backs off, stays out of range and then every 40 seconds or so throws a couple of punches and clinches. THAT ISNT BOXING. RJJ has a lot to answer for, guys with a fraction of his talent try to box the same style and make fools of themselves.
Dirrell isn't a good 'boxer'. Watch Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, Holmes and see how they box in range most of the time, how busy they are, the risks they take (even when 'boxing' - not brawling). Dirrell can't box, which I would forgive, if he could fight, but he can't do that either. Kessler v Froch will be an entertaining fight, Dirrell v Abraham will be a stinker because Dirrell will run, grab, throw few punches and gripe when he loses another decision.
Froch looked awful but so did Duran v Viruet, Chavez v Whittaker etc - but luckily for the good of the sport shutting down an opponent's offence and doing nothing to win yourself doesn't win you a fight.
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 03:16:56 AM
|
|
steadadelica:
|
Finally and decent piece on this fight. Frank you are the kind of writer who will save the sport; not the others who idolise fighters based on their geographic origin and amateur heritage and then refuse to criticise. Like I said all along - its a WORLD title that means other countries are involved along with their own idiosyncratic interpretations of the rules of boxing, so deal with it. What i like most about this piece though is the amount of BS the writer cuts through. in reality neither fighter deserve the win, but what do you do, give a loss to both fighters? Froch was lucky to have be in his back garden, Dirrell was unlucky (under prepared) out of his comfort zone, just shows more American need to fight out of the US, which when they do they are normally successful at, so why not do it more? after all it is boxing that will benefit.
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 04:36:09 AM
|
|
Smiley:
|
Froch is a bum who will lose his next bout fo' sure!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 05:55:03 AM
|
|
MisterLee:
|
Ya'll haters for sho! Come on! Froch did beat pascal and taylor. A super speedy counter puncher like DIrrell his number. Watch for him to beat kessler! Ward will late round TKO or UD Kessler for sho! SD at least! And i'll be serving my crow, i'm brewing a BIG POT for myself, and a regular dish for others. If andre ward loses, i'll be eating my crow all week long! Bring it! The rot is addictive! Holler!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 06:39:57 AM
|
|
kountedout:
|
not impressed with froch like everyone else. dont care for his style, he does have the desire and the will. even though i dont like him he is beating these fighters that is suppose to be better then him
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 06:49:06 AM
|
|
bill major:
|
frank,i agree totally with you. it was painful to watch,i couldnt belive that a guy like dirrel was put in there at his skill level anymore than i could believe that froch is a champion, man i long for the 70's and 80's...........
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:14:09 AM
|
|
gm:
|
yeah that fight was all froch's fault. his stand up brawling style is going to make for super boring fights against kessler and abraham too, we should bring in A. Green or someone similar who has had a string of bouts with top notch opposition. Hell lets forget the super six, lets just make it a tournament of who we think has a realistic chance of winning... i propose the super 2... kessler v abraham, will be an awesome 1 fight tournament....
i mean come on get real here, the fight was a dud, the decision was so-so, but you are totally wrong questioning the concept of the most anticipated tournement in boxing for a long long time. the problem is getting the best people to fight.... this has provided a solution. maybe we should go back to non tournament dud match ups as we're used too. I think this article is pretty lame.
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:25:41 AM
|
|
The Good Doctor:
|
Froch is what I would call a guy that uses the best of his limited abilities. He is does nothing very well but he maximizes what he has. He bas been lucky that in his recent notable fights, he has faced guys with glaring flaws in Taylor with stamina and Dirrell in experience. I do believe that when Froch fights a seasoned, talented guy like an Abraham, Pavlik, or Williams he will have serious trouble. I will give him this though, the guy wins and you don't beat Taylor, Dirrell, and Pascal being a complete bumb.
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:35:30 AM
|
|
MisterLee @ bill major:
|
Yo dude, if you want a barn burner just watch casamayor katsidis, if you want tactical fight maybe watch wright taylor, calzaghe kessler, even froch pascal was a beaut, don't need to go back 2 decades for a good fight holler!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:36:15 AM
|
|
MisterLee:
|
Froch's abilities are underrated fo' sho! He can slip punches decently well, tho he leaves himself open offensively sometimes, he does block and parry and slip a lot of shots, he uses his jab decently well, has a decent straight left hand, has a clubbing right hand, can measure and create distance decently well, and has a good chin and heart. It's just that Dirrell had his number and couldn't capitalize on it. Froch will truly shock the world fo' sho! You may not like him, but you'll learn to respect for certain! Holler!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:38:51 AM
|
|
MisterLee:
|
You may not like him, but you'll learn to respect HIM for certain! Holler!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:39:30 AM
|
|
ali:
|
I disagree with F-Lo he did teach him how to fight just because he doesn't do it the same way alot of boxers were taught don't make it wrong. Roy Jones did alot of things that would drive a trainer crazy but thats what work for him. Bottom line is he won the fight in the other guys back yard with no experience all the way in another country give the ni**a credit. Yeah he has some flaws but he's still young but I'll tell you what he ain't easy to hit I think in his fight with AA we will really find out if all the flaws will catch up with him.
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:39:32 AM
|
|
ali @ Isaiah:
|
Hey I want to ask you somethen what makes you think im saying Dirrell won because he's black and won't give credit to a white fighter when he wins
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:52:23 AM
|
|
mabii:
|
An extreme analysis dont you think FLO. Sure, it was not a great fight but it showed me a few things about both fighters. One is that Dirrell can fight if and when he chooses to. I think the fight with Froch would have "seasoned" him up some. There is a point to be made about him changing trainers. His fighting style does not need changing just some fine tuning like learning to fight on the inside and in the pocket. Froch on teh other hand is very effective at what he does and by pure force of will is capable of beating any super middle. He really could fight at light heavy if he chose to.
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:57:47 AM
|
|
brownsugar:
|
pretty cynical article... true in many respects,.. but overly judgemental,.. against both fighters,.. at least the hate went both ways,.. but you can't put guys in a box tagged "barfight" and ignore the greater body of their work... funny,.. after all the prefight annimosity,.. Dirrell and Froch looked like two highschool kids that hate each other in class and then told all their buddies they were going to kick the other guys butt after school,..but when they got to the parking lot with all their friends watching,.. the had to much respect (or was it fear) to lead off first,.. and gradually a sloppy,.. cautious,.. dirty fight emerged... Dirrell landed some shockingly quick and accurate punches,.. while Froch just did whatever since an effective offense was non existant for him,.. he did try to take the lead,. and force some action,.. but Dirrell simply wasn't there... Froch can still be dangerous and has a style that will expose somebody (dont know who but it's going to happen),..in the super six,.. and Dirrell has proven in the past that he always takes the initiative to better his approach after a bad outing,..(especially after his shocker with Curtis Stevens) Dirrell can fight so many ways that I know we havent seen the best of him yet,.. hopefully he'll show us something against AA
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 09:02:49 AM
|
|
MisterLee:
|
I had DIrrell winning rounds 2 & 3 (and 4, 5, 10, 11), and he REALLY stunk up rounds 2 & 3 even tho i gave him those rounds. One of the least entertaining and EFFECTIVE rounds I ever seen (during that period my eyes glazed over and i thought I saw Jones Hopkins 1). Holler! I had a draw without the point deduction, 114-113 Froch with it. I think it rests in round 12, i think he did enough to come back from DIrrell's late barrage (dirrell couldn't sustain it). Holler!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 09:06:17 AM
|
|
MisterLee:
|
b-sug boma ye!!!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 09:07:41 AM
|
|
brownsugar:
|
dr3r42,.. I think that's an excellent point,.. AA's opponents are going to lose if they just wait on the outside,.. for him to throw haymakers at his leisure,.. but what happens when you get chest to chest with him where he can't fire quickly??,.. they show AA way too much respect,.. if somebody brings the fight to him,.. Arthur would be at a disadvantage...and if somebody dared to counter his loaded up haymakers he's gonna be in trouble... but if somebody took the fight too AA in a style like Toney Ayala or Hagler,.. we would see a completely different fight,.. even the very tentative and cautious Taylor,.. left AA's face looking like he'd been in a real fight...I wonder what would have happened if he really tried to fight the man and wrapped more of those hooks around those earmuffs...I'm just sayin...
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 09:15:16 AM
|
|
brownsugar:
|
MisterLee,.. in a way it's probably best the decision went against Dirrell,. even though I thought he should have gotten the nod or maybe a draw at worst,.. this way however,.. he just got his official indroctination to the pros....
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 09:30:20 AM
|
|
ali @ MisterLee:
|
Froch missed alot and the only time he got a good punch in was when he was being dirty. Dirrell punches were clean punches I do think Dirrell started to fall apart in the last minute of some rounds but I think he won the fight.
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 09:47:27 AM
|
|
MisterLee @ ali:
|
Cheers. I can't disagree with your opinion. I can see how pple view it that way. I had it close, i think dirrell had control of the fight much of the fight, but he didn't throw enough leather to win all the rounds (or any at all!). The rounds i gave him, he clearly won, 6 rounds which i counted, and he coulda won round 12 if he had finished strong. Either way, i'm watching taylor abraham, and it's round 8, and i dunno why pple think "abraham" is nothing special. He beat one of three guys that meant anything in the middle weight division for the last few years (bhop, taylor, and pavlik). And Arthur did begin breaking him down exactly at round 6, when can say all we want, but arthur and froch deserve their credit for beating Taylor, it wans't just "luck", it was patience and perseverence to break down a once almost great fighter to the canvas. Holler. Andre Ward 2009!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 09:52:35 AM
|
|
The Watcher:
|
Frank Lotierzo I am new to your writings, I usually only read David "The Great" Avila's work but this is good. I don't like watching (& I am the Watcher) Dirrell fights. He has abilities but all that running? are you serious? look man, fear sometimes can be a good thing but that is just way tooo much "movement". GOOD CALL!! I will be Watching you Frank Lotierzo
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 10:10:00 AM
|
|
brainbashedbritboy:
|
Iv gotta agree F-Lo, i was there ring side and i did have Froch gettin the nod, but they were both very poor. Froch didnt know how to handle the slick moving Dirrell and Dirrell just wanted to hit and run. I was screaming for Froch to cut off the ring but even with that he struggled then when he did Dirrell would throw before Froch then hold. As far as big billed fights go it was a stinker, King Arthur eas amazing in contrast. I admit i support Froch being the Brit boy but iv never believed he was anything more than what he is, his fight against Taylor elevated him in many eyes to be something he wasnt, let me ask till the knockout of Taylor what did America think of Froch...i would guess not a lot. Froch is extremely durable, has a fair chin and punch but otherwise....ie skill, is lacking. His speed isnt great, his style is flawed immensley...the low hand. He will be there for 12 rounds but that dont make him great. Dirrell, despite this couldnt exploit the flaws. his speed was greater, his combos crisper and more accurate but he fought like an amateur, he ran and looked scared when cornered. Complaining of infighting, punching on the break, displaying show boat antics. Neither fighter will win the Competition, my money is on Kessler, but King Arthur is definatley in with a good shout. Both Dirrell and Froch would be booted if i had a say, with the intoduction of Pavlik and Hopkins. Pc out all !
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 11:02:36 AM
|
|
brownsugar@MisterLee:
|
I don't think anybody is saying AA is "nothing special",.. with 10 defenses (even though many aren't household names even in germany),.. and his thrilling 1 punch demolition of JT in the last 10 seconds of the fight,.. he has to be respected as one of the most dangerous fighters in the tourney,.. but being the shortest fighter with the least reach,.. and the lowest work rate,.. and the most basic style,... these are things that other elite boxers can exploit,.. I can even see Froch mauling his way to victory over the heavy hitting AA by doing what he does best,.. making things wild and crazy and getting him out of his comfort zone...... just my personal assessment,.. it's the same way I felt about Tyson,.. who eventually met somebody who wasn't intimidated by his style..and took advantage of his limitations,..... the winner of this tourney will be the guy with the best all around skills,..
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 01:04:55 PM
|
|
Fe'Roz :
|
The title of this piece should be re-named: Hard Hating on Froch-Dirrell. Frank has no mercy. Me, I'm more generous. At least I was on Saturday. But if you honestly asked me if I would care if I never saw either fighter again in the near future, the answer would be No. Without hesitation. Froch is a disaster. Dirrell is better but not for prime time. In a tourney filled with wild cards...it just got wilder with JT's devastating loss. Bring in Green and you don't know what you get. Pavlik just got eliminated from consideration.....unless he and Froch meet in the backroom of a pub. Bute should have got the nod...but damn, talk about hometown decisions. He made Juanma look sober the way he was stumbling to the finish line against Andrade. Andrade is a good opponent. But not a champion contender. So who does that leave. Bika. Now we've gone from Super Six back to The Contender. My call: Kessler takes them all to school.
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 07:14:34 PM
|
|
MisterLee @ b-sug:
|
You are right, abraham might be the shortest and stubbiest one of the tournament, but the guy is built like a tree trunk, his shoulders and arms are as thick as my thighs, and his trunk is so solidly built. It'll take a lot to chop that tree down.... like an edison miranda with boxing skills and a game plan. I got froch and ward meeting in the finals, and ward picks him apart in 9 rounds. Holler!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 08:09:52 PM
|
|
Isaiah@ali:
|
The only thing I can think of that you're refering to is when on another article, I said some people's stereotypes on white fighters was just idiotic, or something like that. I was talking to Leroy at the time wasn't I? We were just agreeing on something like that. I don't remeber dude and I can't find the piece that was on. Did I reference you? By the way, I didn't say nothing about Dirrell not giving credit to someone for any reason, that much I do know. Carl Froch won that fight anyway, fair and square. Dirrell was really ticking me off with that dancing around and not throwing hardly any punches. Dirrell gave the fight away. No sympathy from me. Next time, freakin come to win or stay home!
Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 10:29:13 PM
|
|
ali @ Isaish:
|
Yeah you agreed with him when he said Me and FeRoz was mad the white guys was beating the black guys. Well let me go ahead and ask you do you think that im just bitter about the brothers losing to the white guys.
Thursday Oct 22, 2009 08:16:40 AM
|
|
robinhood:
|
Even if froch beat every decent fighter in the world right now i really think that you would still hate him. He had a great fight against current LH world champion pascal, going toe to toe nearly the whole way. Then got up off the canvas and dropped taylor in a great fight which i dont think was one sided at all ( i was ringside). then he fights the great american hope dirrell (or at least he was before saturday (short memories eh guys) and he beats him, granted it was boring, but that was just because of the 2 fighters styles. EVERYTIME i read these blogs its full of people making judgment on fighters who before the fight they were praising.
Carl brings heart and some good punching with some exciting slips thrown in. No he isnt the most glamorous fighter, but if he wins this tourney (and he may) no doubt all the EXPERTS will be claiming they loved him all along...
Everyone is entitled to an opinion.. it amazes me that some people are looked as, as an authority. especially the guy who wrote this article. Like sheep they followed
Thursday Oct 22, 2009 11:39:09 AM
|
|
Scott M:
|
Froch is a tough but limited fighter, Dirrell is athletically gifted, but still green. Dirrell fights as if he's still in the amateurs. Froch will always be the more entertaining of the two to watch, as long as he's matched with someone who's willing to stand and trade shots, but eventually, that style will cost him. Neither man has a real chance to win the tournament, in my opinion. Kessler & Abraham are #1 and #2, respectively, and it will be interesting to see who emerges as the true champ in the end.
Thursday Oct 22, 2009 03:24:51 PM
|
|
MisterLee:
|
I have froch vs. ward in finals. i dont see either of them losing before that. Ward wins by late round stoppage or UD. Froch is much better than most of you guys want to admit. Even if he was outskilled, unlike most fighters, he fought on and tried his best to win. He did not concede victory b/c he hit a wall. He would even admit prolly it was not his best night but he did what he needed to in order to win. HOller!
Thursday Oct 22, 2009 06:20:16 PM
|
|
martel:
|
Froch will beat kessler his upright stiff style is made for froch.I think dirrells style is the best way to beat froch.the only mistake dirrell made is not fighting on the inside more instead of holding every minute.froch will use his jab against the shorter arthur abraham and jab his head off allday long!I think the dirrell fight is the closest u will c to froch loosing in this tourney unless they meeb again!
Thursday Oct 22, 2009 08:50:35 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is It Only Money That Matters?
"Who refuses to take a drug test worth $40 million?" For the American psyche, money is everything. It transcends what is right or what is wrong. For a certain amount of money, I'll do anything. Manny is Filipino, and he cannot fathom that kind of thinking. Is that what capitalism should be? I can't understand why $40 million should dictate your personality. Simply put, Pacquiao has his own dignity and refuses to be manipulated into taking $40M and giving his (butt) to anyone who wants it." ---TSS reader "Tony" informs readers of a possible cultural difference which causes certain peoples to interpret Pacquiao's refusal to cater to Mayweather's testing demands (photo by Chris Cozzone)
|
|
|
|
|