The Sweet Science
HOME ABOUT CONTACT
EnglishRussianChineseItalianDeutchFrenchSpanishPortugueseJapaneseKorean
The Sweet Science Boxing
Boxing Podcast Boxing RSS 
Klitschko Brock


Sunday Nov 12, 2006

Until he delivered that exclamation point, too many question marks lingered in the minds of the 14,000 fans in the Garden and those watching on HBO who were hoping for Wlad to put a firm stamp on the division.

      Print this article     Email this article

Wladimir Klitschko, Still A Work In Progress

By Michael Woods

You did not have to be a particularly educated student of the savage science to note after two rounds on Saturday evening that Wladimir Klitschko was essentially performing with one hand tied behind his back against Calvin Brock at Madison Square Garden.

Dr. Steelhammer, a patient dissector of foes, relied almost exclusively on his left jab, sometimes thrown with serious intent, sometimes thrown with halfhearted effort as part of his lengthy sizing-up process.

And when he finally took Emanuel Steward’s advice, and released his right from solitary confinement, the Boxing Banker, the 31-year-old Brock, paid dearly.

In the Garden, and after doing some unofficial polling on message boards and with random fans in attendance, the consensus take on the main event was that Brock looked in over his head, tight and nervous, and the 6-6, 241-pound Klitschko took too long to get down to business and take out the overmatched North Carolinian. 

Brock, at 6-2, 224½ pounds, drew impolite guffaws in the first as the big Ukrainian tossed him to and fro with embarrassing ease. At that moment you could flash back to Emanuel Steward labeling Shannon Briggs a more dangerous foe than Brock, and thoroughly sign off on that notion.

Before the post-bout press conference kicked off, the super-amiable Briggs held court, and rightfully chided Brock for not pressuring Klitschko, whose stamina and cool can be challenged with concerted pressure, which Brock did not apply. The Brooklyn-born Briggs, the poster child for asthmatics everywhere, would set forth on Klitschko, given the opportunity, with the singularity of purpose of a bill collector, he said.

I cannot fault Brock totally for his strategy. He was after all physically overmatched, with an inadequate reach and physique to match up favorably with the powerful PhD. He did winning work with his meaningful rights to the body that made Wlads’ left side blush with discomfort. He took what was given to him, really. But to best attack Wlad, I believe, you must take not what’s not given to you. You must press the matter, get Wlad into a mental danger zone. You must give him a bad acid flashback with an assault that makes him think he’s back in with Corrie Sanders. The born-again Brock, by all accounts a solid citizen, owns a demeanor that will no doubt make him a respected member of his community, but never a feared practitioner of this bloodsport.

But will Klitschko ever be seen as the same?

Steward, before the bout, was positioning his man as moving towards a level of skillfulness and regard that would approach his last best student, Lennox Lewis. He was talking about some of Wlad’s tools in glowing fashion, comparing them with some of the all-time Canastotans. But this effort, against Brock, I suspect, will quell that mindset from Manny.

Let me back off a half step, here.

This was a win, let’s bottom line it. Wlad beat an undefeated fighter, another undefeated fighter. And he did it in exclamatory style, planting Brock’s face deep into the grimy canvas at MSG.

But.

But until he delivered that exclamation point, too many question marks lingered in the minds of the 14,000 fans in the Garden and those watching on HBO who were hoping for Wlad to put a firm stamp on the division.

Why is he waiting so long?

Is there a clause in his contract that forbids him from throwing a right hand till the fifth, so the fight will go a certain distance?

Will Wlad ever be truly healed, mentally, from his brown acid bad trips against Sanders and Lamon Brewster? 

Reading body language is an inexact proposition so this has to qualify as speculation, somewhat. But Steward didn’t look or act overly joyous at the post-fight press conference. He was slumped in his chair, that trademark grin was absent.

“We wanted him to throw rights earlier,” Steward said when a writer asked about that tardy right hand.

Wlad followed that critique by saying that in his mind, the left is the key to everything, and he wanted to make sure that when he unleashed the right, it would find its target.

“I wanted to make sure it landed not in air, but on chin,” he said.

That’s a wise tactic, to be sure.

But “wise” tactics aren’t what most of us who want one clear heavyweight leviathan to separate himself from the pack of tweeners.

We desire closers, finishers, we want sharks in trunks.

We don’t tune in to the heavyweights to marvel at a measured performance most notable for its dazzling game plan. 

“It was not one of his better performances,” Steward said. “He was a little more patient than he should have been.”

Perfectly said, Emanuel.

“It’s all’s well that ends well,” the trainer said. “He will be better his next fight though.”

So for now, comparisons with Hall of Famers will cease.

On Saturday, Wladimir Klitschko got the job done, but in underwhelming fashion. He did it in New York, where we expect more. In the Greatest City in the World, we expect greatness. Not solidity, or competence. 

Klitschko is a well-spoken gentleman who I will admit a certain newfound bias for: with his worldly outlook and his philanthropic works, he is the antidote to the walking, talking “black eyes” who have too often represented the sport and the division.

His humility, too, is one of his most admirable assets, and he rightfully showed it after the Brock bout.

“I intend to unify the heavyweight division,” Klitschko said. “I don’t consider myself the real champion. Only the guy who unifies the championships will be respected.”

Wladimir Klitschko, age 30, a veteran of 50 professional fights, is still a work in progress, and it remains to be seen whether he can still be the fighter Steward hopes and thinks he can be.

add to Facebook add to Myspace add to Digg add to Mixx add to Linkedin add to Yahoo Buzz

Contact Michael Woods @ TheSweetScience.com


Dizzy:  I think Brock deserves credit for his game challenge. He was just in with a much bigger, more experienced man. I'd love to see Klitschko fight the retired Corrie Sanders next, and I firmly believe that Sanders' unorthodox southpaw power would starch Wladimir again.
Sunday Nov 12, 2006 08:57:35 PM
A2:  Every boxer has some underwhelming performances. Remember Lewis-Tua? Lewis-Klitschko? Lewis-Rachman I? I only saw the clip of the knockout but from what I've read, Wlad needs to let his hands go earlier and more often.
Sunday Nov 12, 2006 09:11:56 PM
Dejavu:  I don't understand the point of this article. When Wlad lost to Brewster most people were saying he punched himself out and now when Wlad is cautious and smarter fighter, he is not good either? Wlad dominated Brock and knocked him out, what else do you want? Did Lewis always perform well? Especially against Vitali, he was not good at all. As for the comment above, Wlad will destroy Sanders, Sanders beat Wlad with a lucky punch. Wlad was a diffirent fighter then.
Monday Nov 13, 2006 06:22:02 AM
Dan:  Not sure is everyone was aware, but Corrie is staging a comeback on 11/24. I think a rematch is a fight that a lot of people would pay for. I agree with dejavu's comment about Wlad fighting cautiously. After all it was a win, KO. However when I walked out of the Garden I recall thinking there hasn't been a fight that Wlad has won that has been exciting since he beat Mercer.. Its only exciting when Wlad is KO'd or knocked down. The same goes for Brock. I don't recall any overall exciting fights he's been in. He got off the canvas to beat McCline (big deal) and after a snooze fest he knocked out Zuri Lwarence. I think it only makes sense to have Wlads next fight be Briggs. A fight where either of them can be KO'd.
Monday Nov 13, 2006 07:15:31 AM
Buck Ziemelis:  Sanders would be good revenge for Wlade. Sanders could of been big time 10 years ago but did'nt dedicate himself to the sport ,he enjoys golf instead and in his youth was a sprinter. He has natural power and is dangerous but only for a few rounds. Wlade should make some easy $ in the homeland with this one before returning to Shannon Briggs this summer where the Cannon will misfire if Wlade fights with more intentisty.
Monday Nov 13, 2006 11:26:35 AM
larry:  As much as I hate to say it because I have never been a Klitschko fan I would definitely like to see him, or any of the heavies for that matter, unify the heavyweight belts. And at the moment I think that of all the sorry competition that we have to choose from in the heavyweight division he is leading the pack (excuse me while I go cry myself to sleep)...
Monday Nov 13, 2006 11:44:55 AM
GRMZ:  I tried to jump on the Wlad bandwagon once before. Then came the Sanders fight. I refuse to be bam-boozled again. Whether anyone says it or not, his heart will always be questioned. We have not seen him on the ropes and come back yet. Until that happens, I believe the belt will be traveling from temporary champ to temporary champ. Having said that, I wish there was an American fighter I could support....Shannon Briggs????
Monday Nov 13, 2006 12:30:37 PM
larry:  I hear you GR, but Briggs will lose his next fight no matter who he goes against....
Monday Nov 13, 2006 01:15:01 PM
Johnny:  I think Wlad will be fine with Steward in his corner. He will teach him things like using his long reach with the jab, fighting smaller opponents and hugging when others get inside him. That was all Lennox Lewis did, fighting 5 footers like Tua, Holyfield, Rahman, Tyson etc. And Lennox Lewis had as glassy a jaw as Wlad does. And why dump on Wlad because he doesn't "look" good. If you want to watch some skilled championship boxing matches, you are watching the wrong division!
Monday Nov 13, 2006 03:05:22 PM
SuperC:  I would like you guys to go see my prediction on the Klitschko-Brock fight from the column posting on friday. I hit it exactly, I said K-man in 7 rounds or less. As i said before, Vitali was better but, Wlad is impressing me as of late. He is a more complete fighter due to the KO losses. He now knows the worst part of fighting in the sweet science game, which makes him more dangerous. He should try and get the titles unified first and then go get Sanders, who would surely fight him for the extra cash if he isnt still dazed from Vitali crushing him. I would say that he needs to go get Brewster , but i feel like he won the fight but ran out of gas and wasnt really hit hard enough to stop him. If he can unify then beat Purity and Sanders (the Sniper) , he would go out as an all time great and secure a good spot in the top 10. --- TY
Monday Nov 13, 2006 05:07:02 PM
WK v CS rematch:  Styles make fights. Wlad is not as good as Vitali (was), and he has confidence issues. I think a Klitschko - Sanders rematch is an exciting, marketable bout and I believe that Sanders will win again.
Monday Nov 13, 2006 06:54:42 PM
A2:  Klitschko ices Sanders in a rematch. I think Wlad lost the fight because he wasn't prepared for Sanders. Now he would know exactly what's up: Sanders is an extremely strong, extremely fast southpaw who is, or was, probably the most dangerous heavyweight in the world for three rounds. In a rematch Klitschko would keep him at bay with the jab and tag him with bludgeoning right hands all night just like Vitali did.
Monday Nov 13, 2006 10:37:06 PM
nick:  klitschko fights the way he does because he is a cautious make no mistakes type of fighter now. He will never fight with the balls that a young holyfiend or tyson had, he is simply not a risk taker. the uneventfull rounds in this fight were bascially figuring out rounds. What will be interesting is to see how he fights when someone forces him to dig deep , the only real challenge for him out there i think would be an in shape james toney, I like shannon briggs as a personality but i do consider him and oleg maskaev to be hard luck guys that were fortunate enough to wn a belt and deserve the payday but i think they are not "lasting" championship material. the other dangerous heavyweight out there is Sam Peter but the thing about sam is i don't think he is getting any better or anymore skilled and does'nt even seem to be in as good a shape as he used to be in your other wildcard out there is Sultan Ibragimov who is now signed to golden boy, that guy when he lets his hands go is impressive... btw what ever happened to malcomn Tann where's he been.
Wednesday Nov 15, 2006 02:50:48 AM

Name: Email:  (will not be displayed, TSS Privacy, your email is required to autoapprove your comment)

Please be respectful, and do not use foul language in your comment

Discuss this article in the forum

  THESWEETSCIENCE.COM   More from the Top Team of Writers in the Fight Game ...
 
More from this Writer
Columns by Michael Woods
 
Recent boxing Columns and News
•  Peter Steps Up Again, Wlad's Definitely Still There by Phil Woolever
•  JMM Marquez-Diaz Embodies Mexican Revolution by David A. Avila
•  Contender Argenis Mendez Gets It Done In NYC by George Kimball
 
 


TSS Video
Timothy Bradley Interview
  
James Toney warning UFC world
  
A Klitschko Collage
  
More Video
TSS Photo Archive

You Have To Take The Test To Be Called The Best
"People can say whatever they like about Floyd Mayweather Jr....and they will....but they can never say the man challenges himself to be the best." ---TSS All-Star reader El Feroz weighs in on who he thinks is at blame for the Manny-Money negotiation flameout

Round by Round Coverage
Marquez vs Diaz II
Fight aficionados; come on back for live, round by round coverage of the WBA/WBO Lightweight Championship pitting Juan Manuel Marquez against Juan Diaz on Saturday, July 31st beginning at 9pm ET / 6pm PT.

The Sweet Science Writers
The Sweet Science
Legal  | Privacy  |  Sitemap  |  Disclaimer  |  The Savage Science © 2004-2007 The Sweet Science Boxing.  All rights reserved. .