The Sweet Science
HOME ABOUT CONTACT
EnglishRussianChineseItalianDeutchFrenchSpanishPortugueseJapaneseKorean
The Sweet Science Boxing
Boxing Podcast Boxing RSS 
Larry Holmes


Tuesday Oct 31, 2006

“I had 74 fights in my record and I wanted to make it 75,” said Holmes. “That’s the only reason why I accepted to fight Butterbean. I have to admit that he hurt when he hit me.”

      Print this article     Email this article

The Best Heavyweight Champion of the Last 28 Years

By Luca De Franco

In most all-time rankings you won’t find Larry Holmes, but he surely was one of the greatest heavyweight champions ever. From 1978 to 1985, The Easton Assassin dominated the scene winning the WBC and IBF titles, making 20 successful defenses, became involved in the most publicized fight of his era (the one against Gerry Cooney who lost by TKO 13) and came close to equalling Rocky Marciano’s 49-0 record losing on points to Michael Spinks in what Ring Magazine called the Upset of the Year

If numbers aren’t enough to convince you that Larry was really dominant, just look at the list of boxers that he defeated: top-rated contenders Mike Weaver (TKO 12), Earnie Shavers (TKO 11), Renaldo Snipes (TKO 11) and Carl Williams (on points); past and future heavyweight champions Ken Norton (split decision), Trevor Berbick (on points), Leon Spinks (TKO 3), Tim Witherspoon (split decision), James Bonecrusher Smith (TKO 12) and the legendary Muhammad Ali. Now, it’s true that Ali was on his way down when he challenged Holmes, but that’s no excuse for a one-sided loss. On October 2, 1980 at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, Holmes hit Ali at will and forced him to remain on his stool at the end of the tenth stanza. The scorecards were 100-90, 100-89 and 100-90 for The Easton Assassin.

Of course, Holmes also made some easy defenses against soft opponents like Alfredo Evangelista (KO 7), Ossie Ocasio (TKO 7), Lorenzo Zanon (KO 6), Leroy Jones (TKO 8), Scott LeDoux (TKO 7), Randall Tex Cobb (on points), Lucien Rodriguez (on points), Scott Frank (TKO 5), Marvis Frazier (TKO 1) and David Bey (TKO 10). It has to be noticed that even the underdogs had good records and every champion alternates a tough fight with an easy one.

No champion, as far as I know, ever did what Homes did against Marvis Frazier. It was one of THE emotional moments in the history of boxing and should be broadcast often to make it known to the detractors of the noble art. On November 25, 1983 at Caesars in Vegas, Larry knocked down Frazier, who wasn’t smart enough to stay down, with a perfect right to the jaw. Holmes understood that his opponent was easy prey and punched him around the ring like a heavy bag. At one point, the Eastern Assassin turned toward the referee and moved his right arm to suggest that he should stop the fight. Mills Lane didn’t do anything. Holmes hit Frazier and again turned toward the referee asking for the massacre to be stopped. Again, Lane let the fight continue. At this point, the champion delivered a big right hand which made Frazier spit out his mouthpiece. Then Holmes hit Frazier with an impressive series of right hands to the face and a big left to the body which convinced Lane to declare the TKO. Could you imagine any prizefighter showing mercy? Larry Holmes did. He kept hitting Frazier because it was his profession, but he showed great humanity asking the referee to stop the massacre because he didn’t want to kill his opponent. I interviewed Holmes for a major Italian newspaper, Il Corriere della Sera, which published it on October 14, 2004 (on that occasion they printed 1,148,913 issues) and asked him about the Frazier fight. This is what he said:

“Marvis Frazier took the fight because the promoter offered him $1,000,000, but he didn’t belong in the same ring with me. I took the fight for the same reason. Making money is the name of the game. Don’t believe the boxers who say they do it for passion, it’s always a matter of money. I asked Mills Lane to stop the massacre because I never wanted to hurt anybody. Today, I hear too many bullies saying that they want to kill their opponent.” 

If I learned something in 16 years of journalism, is that the guys who talk too much never do anything while the ones who don’t talk build something. It’s like a business deal; top businessmen always do what they are supposed to, wimps and crooks find every excuse and never get the job done. Same thing in boxing. Larry Holmes didn’t need to threaten anybody because he let his punches do the talking for him. He just looked Frazier in the eyes while they were in the middle of the ring and that was enough to understand who would have won. Officially, no title was on the line. But everybody knew that if Holmes lost, the WBC would have stripped him of the belt. That’s enough, for me to consider it a title defense.

Among today’s champions, nobody can throw combinations like The Easton Assassin used to do: with power and elegance. Holmes dismantled his opponents apparently without effort making the public believe that throwing ten consecutive punches was easy. Holmes was also brave enough to rise after knockdowns and win the fight. On September 28, 1979, Holmes was sent down by Ernie Shavers (in the 7th round), but The Easton Assassin got revenge and won by TKO 11. It has to be pointed out that Homes had beaten Shavers on points on March 25, 1978. Ernie Shavers is considered by many experts the hardest hitter ever, but Holmes is the only one who beat him twice. From 1969 to 1983, Ernie Shavers built a record of 72 wins (67 KOs), 13 losses and 1 draw. He faced the most dangerous contenders of his time and lost to WBA/WBC champion Muhammad Ali on points. Shavers fought again in 1987 and 1995 – winning twice and losing once – before retiring for good.
 
Going back to Larry Holmes, on November 6, 1981 history repeated itself: he was put down by Renaldo Snipes in the 7th round, but Holmes put him to sleep in the 11th. On September 21, 1985 at Riviera Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Larry Holmes defended the heavyweight belt for the 21st time against light heavyweight champion Michael Spinks. You notice that I don’t mention what belts they wore. No need to do it: both were the legitimate champions in their division. Holmes had a perfect record of 48-0 and beating Spinks (27-0) would make him equal to Rocky Marciano. After 15 rounds, Spinks got a unanimous decision: 145-142 (twice) and 143-142. The rematch took place on April 19, 1986 and Spinks got two cards in his favor: 144-142, 144-141. The other judge scored it 144-141 for Holmes. That was the end of Larry’s prime.

The Easton Assassin fought another 25 bouts, with a record of 21 wins and 4 losses. The most important win took place on February 7, 1992 against Ray Mercer (UD). The losses were in title fights. On January 22, 1988 Holmes was TKOed in four rounds by Mike Tyson. The problem was that Holmes didn’t throw a combination in the entire fight; that’s why I wrote that The Easton Assassin wasn’t the same after the second loss to Spinks. On June 19, 1992 WBA/WBC/IBF champion Evander Holyfield got a large decision against Holmes. But let’s get one thing straight: I don’t think that the Real Deal could have lasted more than six rounds against a young Holmes. On April 8, 1995, WBC king Oliver McCall got a close unanimous decision (one point in two scorecards) against Holmes. On January 24, 1997 Holmes lost another close decision to IBO champion Brian Nielsen. It has to be noticed that the fight took place in Denmark and one judge scored it 116-115 for Holmes. Considering that partisan verdicts are the norm everywhere, probably Holmes was the real winner.

On July 27, 2002 the Easton Assassin fought for the last time against Butterbean Eric Esch. After ten rounds, Holmes won easily on points. When I asked him about that mismatch, he said: “I had 74 fights in my record and I wanted to make it 75. That’s the only reason why I accepted to fight Butterbean. I have to admit that he hurt when he hit me.”
 
Today, Larry Holmes keeps living in Easton where he built a mall and makes money renting the spaces to various companies. Inside the mall, he opened the Ringside Restaurant and Lounge where he displays more than 100 photos, three championship belts and many trophies. Holmes also opened a gym, at 228 Canal Street, to train future champions. At least, that was his intention. That’s what he told me: “Today’s youngsters want to fight a few times on HBO, because they think that will be enough to become famous and make money. It never worked that way and never will. Boxing is a tough sport for tough kids, who can make sacrifices for ten years before getting a big opportunity. The toughest of them become champions and keep the belt for a long time. Defending the belt is as tough as winning it. People who don’t realize that boxing is not easy, will never make it.”       

Larry Holmes
Born on March 11, 1949 in Cuthbert (Georgia).   
Nickname: The Easton Assassin because he is a resident of Easton (Pennsylvania) since 1957.
Record: 69 wins (44 KOs) and 6 losses.
On March 21, 1973 he had his pro debut, winning on points against Rodell Dupree.
On June 9, 1978 he won the WBC title from Ken Norton (on points) and officially defended it 16 times. The win over Marvis Frazier wasn’t a title defense, but Holmes would have been stripped of the WBC belt if he had lost.
On December 11, 1983 Holmes vacated the WBC title and signed with the IBF becoming its first heavyweight champion. He successfully defended the IBF title three times.
Larry Holmes reigned as heavyweight champion from June 9, 1978 to September 21, 1985. That makes 7 years, 3 months and 12 days. It is the second-longest reign in history after Joe Louis who was on top from 1937 to 1948. It has to be noticed that Louis didn’t fight from 1942 to 1946 because of the Second World War.

add to Facebook add to Myspace add to Digg add to Mixx add to Linkedin add to Yahoo Buzz

Contact Luca De Franco @ TheSweetScience.com


Gregg:  I have to agree with this. I didn't like Larry as a kid, probably because he cut down a sick Ali, & of course like most kids then, I loved Ali. But Larry ranks 2nd on my all time list, and it is nonsence to say fighters like Rocky Marciano and Jack Dempsey could have beaten him. Neither would have lasted 5 minutes with Holmes. My top 6 are: 1: Ali 2: Holmes 3: George Foreman 4. Sonny Liston 5. Joe Frazier 6. Joe Louis
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 12:59:06 AM
harvey:  Holmes was a great fighter no doubt, and while this writer is an obvious fan, it should not allow for shoddy journalistic assertions like Ali "was on his way down" when he fought Holmes. What?? He was at the bottom, not on the way there. He had come all the way down over a few years by the time he fought Holmes, not to mention coming out of retirement and fighting for the first time in 2 years against a fighter in his absolute prime. What a ridiculous comment to say "that is no excuse for a one sided loss". Ali was THE definition of a shot fighter at that point - that's a disgraceful lack of respect for the athlete that Ali was (whose own prime was more than 10 YEARS before!), to try to build up the achievements of the subject of the article, when no build up is needed.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 02:06:36 AM
Sid:  Larry Holmes was a bum. He defeated nobody of consequence. I don't know why everyone feels compelled to give him a lofty rating on the all-time list.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 07:10:18 AM
Geoff:  Shame on you Sid ! Larry Holmes was NOT a bum ! He was the second best fighter in the history of the sport behind Ali, who he happened to bludgeon (forget the age nonsense, Larry would have beaten Ali in his prime because stylistically, the Easton Assassin was too much for him).
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 07:31:41 AM
Cece:  Larry Holmes couldn\'t carry Nicolai Valuev\'s jock.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 07:33:56 AM
Jessie:  Ali had a thyroid problem on that night. Without that, he'd have mopped the floor with Holmes. Remember, Ali had beaten Leon Spinks and Ernie Shavers not too long before that. Holmes was blessed that Ali had that thyroid problem, otherewise boxing history would have been completely different and Ali would have been crowned for the 4th time. People say Ali was old then. He was NOT old. He wasn't even 40. He could have gone on another 5 to 7 years, easily, and challenged and beaten young Tyson.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 07:38:30 AM
Frank:  Ali was 38 going on 70 when he fought Homes. The fact that they sanctioned the bout was criminal.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 07:45:21 AM
Holmes for Prez:  Larry Holmes could come back RIGHT NOW and beat them all. Stick and move, stick and move, slug in spurts. He could make history if he just felt like it.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 08:28:29 AM
Bob:  Wow. Boxing arguments are crazy. Holmes held the undisputed title for seven years in a far grander era than this one. Why so much smack? Rank him where you will, but have respect. I loved Larry for his post-fight interviews when he'd call Ferdie Pacheco "Freddie".
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 08:47:06 AM
Ronald:  Holmes was champion in a terrible era, though that era was much better than this one. The guys like Weaver and Berbick and Page could have tremendous individual nights, but they couldn't put together great successive performances. Holmes was no bum, but if he'd have fought Ali 18 months earlier, he'd have been soundly beaten and perhaps knocked out.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 09:36:25 AM
Shorty:  On the night that Larry Holmes beat "Marvelous" Marvis Frazier, he'd have beaten any man in any era. He was that good, the consummate prizefighter.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 09:57:03 AM
Justin:  Larry Holmes was ORDINARY. A very average performer and NOT The Best Heavyweight Champion of the Last 28 Years (see Tyson, Holyfield, Lewis, Moorer, Bowe, and Foreman).
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 10:05:35 AM
Derrick Lampkins:  People like Sid,CeCe,and Ronald truly don't know boxing if they think Larry Holmes was a bum and couldn't fight. Its a shame that their statements are displayed. And CeCe,shut the F__k up because if I saw you right know,I'd slap the shit out of you for saying Larry, "couldn\'t carry Nicolai Valuev\'s jock." Please in the future,only display credible and knowledgable statements. Thank You!
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 10:08:31 AM
Will Martin:  The only other fighter I've seen show this kind of compassion for another fighter is Emanuel Augustus (formerly Burton). When he saw his opponent grab the back of his own head in obvious pain, Augustus refused to punch him in the head; he threw jabs to the air, and only went to the body for the remainder of the round. That is why Augustus has a permanent place in Michael Katz' penthouse, and why I am such a fan of his.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 11:56:04 AM
Derrick Lampkins:  Again Justin,you don't know boxing if you think Tyson, Holyfield, Lewis, Moorer, Bowe, and Foreman would beat a young Larry Holmes. I'm not referring to the 35 and above Holmes. But the young Holmes that would have hurt any of these fighters. Not taking anything away from these fighters,but truth be told,Larry Holmes was a bad motherf_____! The only heavyweights that I saw beating Holmes during the last 28 years was a young prime Ali,and I see Lennox Lewis giving him trouble,but could Lewis chin take that big right hand, because of his size,but all the rest of them couldn't match his skill and that Goddam jab would make your mother,father,grandparents,and the rest of your goddam family cry.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 12:13:27 PM
Edward:  Larry Holmes would of easily beaten Ali in his prime, we forget Ali would not even be a heavyweight today, I am sick and tired of all this sentimental drivel over Ali and thats what it is drivel. Lets be frank and forget personalities and sentiment here: no one and I do mean no one at any weight could of lived with Tyson in his early twenties, whatever era, Holmes was far from washed up when he was destroyed by Tyson, after all he went on to go the distance with Holyfield, and I have never heard anyone accuse Holyfield of being a bum. Larry Holmes was better than Ali and one of the best, the mans record speaks for itself, and Tyson if not for his depressive personality, rape charge etc, would be regarded, and is by a lot of boxings elite observers, the greatest and certainly the most devastating fighter to ever lace on a pair of boxing gloves, so can we please can the over sentimental rubbish.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 01:08:35 PM
Romi:  This thread is rather comical, so I'll give my 2 cents. Larry Holmes is without question one of the top heavyweight fighters ever. Personally, I'd put him in the top 5 along with Ali, Foreman, Louis, Lewis. His era is a bit overrated, having come along in the late 70's, early 80's, yet he still dominated several fighters that would go on to be titlists. What cost Larry his rightful place near the top is the chip on the shoulder he carried for many years. His post fight comments after Spinks about Rocky Marciano was unforgivable to some writers and unfortunately many never forgot it. His ill fated attempt at taking on a prime Tyson with little preparation, also cost Larry his proper recognition. Simply put, a prime Larry Holmes could have competed with any heavyweight in any era. To think of him less than that is just pure ignorance.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 02:37:57 PM
sean:  larry holmes was a much better fighter than ali. this adoration that is constantly heaped upon ali baffles the mind. larry fought each and every time out while ali took countless punches from nearly every fighter he faced in his second go round and he paid the price. ali's holding and disregard of the rules of the game was on a par with john ruiz.
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 02:44:27 PM
Barry:  Common Sean, don't display your ignorance for all to see. I never thought I would live to see the day that some idiot would compare the Great Ali to -- of all fighters-- John Ruiz. Ali won some great battles in the second half of his career, and the only reason that they were competitive at all was because Ali--although still the greatest heavyweight that ever lived-- was no-where near the fighter he had been before the lay-off. The younger Ali had the perfect heavyweight body; big enough to carry plenty of power, but not so big that he got tired and sloppy late in a fight. He was big, fast, strong, had a granite chin, and the heart of a lion. Zora Folley, his last opponet before the lay-off, put it best: "Louis wouldn't have a chance; he was too slow...There's no way to train yourself for what he does. The moves, the speed, the punches and the way he changes style every time you think you got him figured. The right hands Ali hit me with just had no business landing but they did. They came from nowhere. Many times he was in the wrong position but he hit me anyway. I've never seen anyone who could do that. The knockdown punch was so fast that I never saw it. He has lots of snap, and when the punches land they dizzy your head; they fuzz up your mind. He's smart. The trickiest fighter I've seen. He's had twenty-nine fights and acts like he's had a hundred. He could write the book on boxing, and anyone that fights him should be made to read it." -Zora Folley Sports Illustrated 4-10-1967
Wednesday Nov 1, 2006 09:39:57 PM
Brandon:  Romi displayed a very sensible opinion. Larry Holmes would give "anyone" trouble... he was that good. I will take it a step further, Larry Holmes stood a very real chance of beating anyone too. Everyone from Ali, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Foreman, Frazier, Liston, Hoyfield, Charles, Walcott, Moore, and Tyson. I guess one of the reasons that we all love boxing so much is the "what if" factor. The Holmes that fought Tyson was unprepared, and considerably past his prime- hell, he was probably past his prime when he fought Gerry Cooney. Not to take away from Tyson, who was indeed very bad himself at that point in his career. And I don't believe that Holmes would have beat any of those mentioned easily, I just think that he could beat many of them, if not all. But keep this in mind, in the old days, fighters might lose one and then win one with the same fighter later... they might even fight each other several times. And Dempsey, he was something special for his time, but he would be fighting at Light Heavyweight/ Super Middleweight nowadays. Larry Holmes would have kicked his ass if Dempsey crawled into the same ring with a pair of gloves on his hands.
Thursday Nov 2, 2006 12:28:33 AM
richard pearce england:  Ali was the best and i cant think any fighter would have beat him in his prim of both his early or later fighting skills.
Thursday Nov 2, 2006 02:03:51 AM
sean:  barry, never compared them at all only that their knack for holding an opponent had similarities. in fact if you get a chance review ali's second fight with joe frazier. this was a ten round win for ali. over the course of ten rounds ali initiated 150 clinches. but don't take my word for it as this was reported by a major magazine back then. sounds rather 'ruiz' like dont'cha think??
Thursday Nov 2, 2006 07:09:47 PM
diamond dave:  Anyone who says Larry Holmes was a bum needs to take a look at nowadays mediocre heavyweight division. Im not going to call any professional fighter a bum because boxing is a super tough sport and just to be there they have to be pretty damn good. Anyone who does not realize this has never competed in the ring and felt the pressure, pain and endurance it takes to make it out on your feet. Larry Holmes did more than just make it out on his feet. Dude he held the title for seven years. Granted Norton, Ali and a few other opponents were past their prime but how people say Larry never fought anyone? Holyfield, Tyson, Ali, Norton, and Ernie Shavers were all bad ass top notch heavyweights. The era of heavyweights in which Holmes competed was far more competitive than nowaday's version so give me a break. I loved watching him come back at like 54 to whup Butterbean's fat ass all over the ring for ten rounds, that was great. Holmes was great. One thing though; he would never have beaten a prime Ali; stylistically or otherwise. No way.
Friday Nov 3, 2006 12:12:29 PM
barry:  Hey Sean, the second Frazier fight was a twelve rounder. And a smart fighter knows how to hold to nulify his opponent inside and Ali, a very smart fighter indeed, was a master at holding -- the same as he was a master at everything else of any consequence to his fighting style. The only area where Ali wasn\'t a master was body punching but that was more than compensated by his mastery of punching to the head. I am sure there must be some comic book monster without a head and perhaps he might give Ali some trouble. But as far as former heavyweight champions go they all had heads on their shoulders and thus would have been no match for a prime Muhammad Ali. He was so fast and strong against Zora Folley that he defied the laws of physics. Holmes was good and he came along at a good time just like Marciano did; otherwise neither would have been a champion if they had come along when either Ali or Louis were in their prime. Holmes was good; ALI WAS A GOD!
Saturday Nov 25, 2006 12:50:28 PM
DARNELL:  IM HERE TO TELL YOU THAT MUHAMMAD ALI WAS THE GREATEST OF ALL TIMESFriday Apr 6, 2007 12:59:49 PM
Bill:  Holmes was a great champion. Holmes would have beaten Ali. I have the pleasure of going to Holmes's gym and working out. Larry is in there all of the time. In his pirme, Larry would hvave taken Tyson. Forget all of this crap that Ali would have KO'd Holmes or easily beaten Holmes. You have to remember that back in 1971 (before Holmes was even a pro) Holmes was giving Ali great sparring matches, and actualy beating him some days. Now I know Ali wasn't a very good gym fighter, but man, he could still fight. I rate Holmes #4 of all time Only with Joe Louis, Muhammad Ali, and Rocky Marciano ahead of him. If Larry trained for a year, and got into fighting shape, he could beat a lot of heavyweights out there in a 3 round fight.
Thursday Apr 12, 2007 04:02:36 PM
robert:  Ali in his prime was and is the greatest heavyweight in history. The very few fools who don't think so always bring up either fights ali had way past his peak, or bring up gym workouts against a young Holmes when Ali never tried to hurt a sparring partner. Ali from 1965-1967 was unbeatable. Neither Holmes or Tyson, or Louis, Marciano, Dempsey etc etc would have had any chance vs the pre exiled Ali. Oh and by the way Ali did clinch in superfight II with Frazier a'lot. but you guys forget he also had Frazier out on his feet in round 2, but the ref accidentally thought he heard the bell go off with 25 seconds remaining saving Frazier from sure ko.
Wednesday Mar 18, 2009 12:04:38 PM
Carmen:  The Mayo Hospital found a hole in Ali's brain and Don King still let the fight go on. A real shame, very sad. I also blame Angelo Dundee.
Thursday May 7, 2009 12:20:53 PM

Name: Email:  (will not be displayed, TSS Privacy, your email is required to autoapprove your comment)

Please be respectful, and do not use foul language in your comment

Discuss this article in the forum

  THESWEETSCIENCE.COM   More from the Top Team of Writers in the Fight Game ...
 
More from this Writer
Columns by Luca De Franco
 
Recent boxing Columns and News
•  Was Ward Looking For A Way Out From Green Fight? Team Ward Responds by Raymond Markarian
•  The Fighter Who Beats Manny Pacquiao Can't Be Manufactured, Part II by Frank Lotierzo
•  Mayweather, Mosley In Concert On Drug Testing
•  Evander Holyfield/Frans Botha Is A Go For April 10
 
 


TSS Video
Roger and Floyd Mayweather in LA talking about Mosley fight
  
Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins smack talking in L.A.
  
Oscar De La Hoya on Mosley-Mayweather fight and Manny Pacquiao
  
More Video
TSS Photo Archive

Angie And Goody...23 Years Later
Twenty three years later after they seconded Marvin Hagler and Ray Leonard in Las Vegas, Goody Petronelli and Angelo Dundee crossed paths again. This time, it was at Foxwoods. Photo/friend of TSS "The Iceman" John Scully reports there were only pleasantries exchanged. Goody didn't debate the split decision victory enjoyed by Leonard, which to this day Hagler disputes.

Round by Round Coverage
Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto
Fight aficionados, tune in for live, round by round coverage of the Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto welterweight championship on Saturday, November 14th beginning at 9 pm ET / 6 pm PT.

The Sweet Science Writers
The Sweet Science
Legal  | Privacy  |  Sitemap  |  Disclaimer  |  The Savage Science © 2004-2007 The Sweet Science Boxing.  All rights reserved. .