The Sweet Science
HOME ABOUT CONTACT
EnglishRussianChineseItalianDeutchFrenchSpanishPortugueseJapaneseKorean
The Sweet Science Boxing
Boxing Podcast Boxing RSS 
Lou DiBella


Tuesday Oct 3, 2006

A new breed of promotional enterprise from figures as diverse as Lou DiBella to fighter turned promotional impresario Oscar De La Hoya came to symbolize a new age of transparency and fairness.

      Print this article     Email this article

What Ever Happened to Boxing Reform? (Part 1)

By Patrick Kehoe

Remember back when we were all getting used to the notion of living in the 21st Century? Remember when professional boxing was obsessing over the need for fundamental reform in light of the IBF payoff scandal involving the federation President Bob Lee? How the promotional figures, managers and attendant legal minds lined up to pontificate about reforming boxing, getting to a new standard of business practice that would not only insure fairness of access to opportunity for fighters based on their talents but also the long-term safeguarding of the health and financial futures for those who take the ultimate risks in the ring: the fighters!

Six and a half years on, more than a half decade later, just what became of all the good will and rousing PR-speak on the nobility and necessity for progressive action and enduring safeguards? Just what effects did initiatives such as the Muhammad Ali Act have on boxing and on the boxers themselves? A new breed of promotional enterprise from figures as diverse as Lou DiBella to fighter turned promotional impresario Oscar De La Hoya came to symbolize a new age of transparency and fairness. How has their presences altered the fates of developing fighters?

These are some of the issues we hope explore over the coming weeks in a series of features examining what became of the millennial reform movement in boxing. We might begin by looking at just how passionate an issue reform was for internet boxing scribes in the year 2000; to do that we offer up this writer’s anxious calls for urgent accountability.

Boxing Coming Clean
Commentary by Patrick Kehoe – April 11, 2000

Prosecutor Jose P. Sierra opened the federal case against Robert W. Lee on Tuesday in New Jersey. In a sense the credibility of boxing's ability to act with independent integrity is on trail. Boxing has long been a pawn for influence peddling forces – the caricature of felons hiding out in sunglasses under diffident palms at poolside, the proverbial professional gamblers and racketeers of nocturnal omnipresence – are now partnered with the 'officially empowered' media savvy influence brokers of ‘governmental oversight’ who turn out to be no less the bad guys, no less corrupt, no less unethically cretinous. The video- and audiotaped evidence in the IBF case, in concert with witness testimony, will attempt to lift the lid off the practice of boxing's version of insider trading.

Money from promoters, or channeled through intermediaries from various parties of dire interest, finds its way into the various sanctioning organizations, as part of the normative practice of validating preferential careers, sliding fighters up the funicular ratings ladder, all at the expense of fighters not aligned with powerful representation. We need only look at the careers of Bernard Hopkins as an unrealized superstar/struggling free agent and Tim Witherspoon, frozen out by refusing the manipulating patronage of Don King, to get a glimpse of the "control fetish" which predominates the licensing and market controlling of fighters… that and the narrow gauntlet of top-flight placements that determines the championship belts in boxing. As one manger told me recently, “I need to get to ***’s annual convention because, let’s face it, that’s where you sell the viability of your fighter – sell meaning buy!”

Boxing tells its competitors to play by the rules of the business – comportment to the various commission’s governance – or you are finished before you begin. There is no self-determinism in the business of boxing except as proscribed by the ruling money manipulators; the business of boxing is controlled collusion, without accountability or transparency or ethical moorings. Perhaps... perhaps, the trial of the IBF rankings fixing will be the beginning of the end of "business as usual." Perhaps, now in this age of instantaneously shared information we can all act as monitors of conscious against the practices of exclusion, collusion and obvious graft. How? We might begin with the empowerment of your wallet and acts of collective attention.

The case in New Jersey at least illustrates the surface abuse, enumerating some 32 bribes which found there way into the hands of IBF founder Robert W. Lee, totally some $338,000, invalidating the idea of objective merit, which has long been the predicate for a fighter's status in boxing. Or has the idea of merit been just a long held myth? Surly, we can argue that another time. Clearly, money for favorable status has existed within the fabric of boxing since the last century. To say this is not to condone the practice; it is however to say that money for special status has long been endemic to the "culture" of boxing, which as a semi-regulated sport has always taken the most free market, if not freebasing, debasing, detours.

We can itemize all of these insidious contentions and yet boxing has also been a showcase for the likes of Muhammad Ali and Joe Louis and Sugar Ray Robinson; still, the summit is never the measure of the totality. And in saying that, we have to clean up the system for the ultimate protection of all fighters who wish to aspire to the full reaches of their dedication. Boxing should work with the talent and desire of a fighter, not act to merely exploit it. Let's hope that now even the established order can begin to deconstruct the system of "pay for play," a corruption amounting to a caste system of purchased opportunities, bought and paid for by promoters like Bob Arum, Don King and Cedric Kushner, in favor of basic fairness. We do not single them out to single them out; everyone pays, such is the environmental bottom line.

Ironically, the fate of the game resides in hands of its perpetrators, as we who also love the game now cast our critical gaze upon them. Efficacy should not be chasing a Holy Grail. Doing what equates to basic fairness should not require a millennial Renaissance akin to the miraculous.

This is what boxing must now demand of its internal processes, if it ever hopes to validate itself as a sport of decency within the global entertainment industry.

Read Part 2 by Patrick Kehoe on Boxing Reform

add to Facebook add to Myspace add to Digg add to Mixx add to Linkedin add to Yahoo Buzz

Contact Patrick Kehoe @ TheSweetScience.com


tommy noel:  It's a sad commentary when a great sport has to be maligned by all this legalise. Except for the very high level superstars most people involved in the sport are not represented by educated business types. This includes the fans, fathers who try to live thru their offspring etc,. most of today's fan base have probably been to a alphabet championship fight but they have never seen a real champion. Along with the State Athletic commissions that are mostly polical appointees and know nothing about boxing it's a wonder that the game is flourishing today even though main stream media doesn't know about it. I'm writing from California and the nmber of boxing cards this state is having is on the increase and will continue on the rise,because it's what the people want. I can see your a very intelligent person and way above the brain matter of just about all of us and you have it correct but from amateur through World Championship we have a bunch of knucleheads in charge. I've just begun to realize both in boxing and politics we were better off when the Maifia was in control because you knew where you stood. There was structure, just don't screw up!
Tuesday Oct 31, 2006 06:59:03 PM

Name: Email:  (will not be displayed, TSS Privacy, your email is required to autoapprove your comment)

Please be respectful, and do not use foul language in your comment

Discuss this article in the forum

  THESWEETSCIENCE.COM   More from the Top Team of Writers in the Fight Game ...
 
More from this Writer
Columns by Patrick Kehoe
 
Recent boxing Columns and News
•  TSS Salutes One Of Boxing's Special People: Lorraine Chargin by Ron Borges
•  Alan Sanchez Stops Nicaragua’s Alberto Morales by David A. Avila
•  Same Song, Same Dance, Challenger Has NO Chance: Wladimir KOs Chambers by Michael Woods
•  Sechew Powell Gets Revenge With Smart Showing Against Deandre Latimore by Michael Woods
 
 


TSS Video
Roger and Floyd Mayweather in LA talking about Mosley fight
  
Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins smack talking in L.A.
  
Oscar De La Hoya on Mosley-Mayweather fight and Manny Pacquiao
  
More Video
TSS Photo Archive

Angie And Goody...23 Years Later
Twenty three years later after they seconded Marvin Hagler and Ray Leonard in Las Vegas, Goody Petronelli and Angelo Dundee crossed paths again. This time, it was at Foxwoods. Photo/friend of TSS "The Iceman" John Scully reports there were only pleasantries exchanged. Goody didn't debate the split decision victory enjoyed by Leonard, which to this day Hagler disputes.

Round by Round Coverage
Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto
Fight aficionados, tune in for live, round by round coverage of the Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto welterweight championship on Saturday, November 14th beginning at 9 pm ET / 6 pm PT.

The Sweet Science Writers
The Sweet Science
Legal  | Privacy  |  Sitemap  |  Disclaimer  |  The Savage Science © 2004-2007 The Sweet Science Boxing.  All rights reserved. .