The Sweet Science
HOME ABOUT CONTACT
EnglishRussianChineseItalianDeutchFrenchSpanishPortugueseJapaneseKorean
The Sweet Science Boxing
Boxing Podcast Boxing RSS 
Muhammad Ali


Thursday Sep 21, 2006

It is a daunting task deciding who is the greatest pound-for-pound fighter to ever lace up the gloves because sometimes you can’t get by the personal favoritism to see your favorite’s shortcomings.

      Print this article     Email this article

Who's The Greatest

By Michael Olajide

Since the beginning of time – pug time – there have always been discussions and arguments as to who was the greatest fighter to ever lace up a pair of US Grade A, Government neglected leather gloves… and maybe the answer really isn’t as complicated as it appears… I mean, personal reasons aside as to why we favor one fighter over the other, we really CAN get a sense of how two fighters from different generations would match up (and one would have to do that if you were to truly find out who’s the “baddest man” of any epoch) against one another.

Ok, first and foremost, what are the criteria for being admitted into the GOAT (Greatest Of All Time) rankings? Physical fight ability (this is a complex category but basically, the fighter with the best offensive weapons and the best defensive attributes are how we should rate our fighters – in addition to quality of opposition, etc., and so forth) is one of the tools we use to categorize ability; mental strength is another (high pain threshold, the ability to perform under duress or intense pressure, coming from behind or having being knocked down are some ways to measure mental strength). Those categories are the somewhat measurable/immeasurable abilities we can all relate to… and then there are the definitely immeasurable happenings that can effect a fighter’s performance. Certain business or personal relationships that go sour at the most inopportune times, a loss of a loved one, loading of the gloves and favoritism by judges and referees… fighting in someone else’s backyard, etc.

It is a daunting task deciding who is the greatest pound-for-pound fighter to ever lace up the gloves because sometimes you can’t get by the personal favoritism to see your favorite’s shortcomings, but we are gonna try to tackle the gargantuan and feel free to reply… don’t forget to add why you think your selected fighter is the best or different from the “predictable” one I will choose.

Up front, let’s put the collective top-10 fighters in the mix and whittle away from there. Right off the bat we may run into trouble because my choice of top-10 will not be the same as yours, but I am trying to be fair. I am putting in names of fighters I feel are great, but also fighters many others feel are great. In so doing, I am trying not to favor the modern-day fighter. But with yesteryear’s fighters you are taking another person’s word for gospel and if you were to see the fighter on film or live, you may not feel the same way about his abilities as opposed to the abilities of another man. (Also, the attributes that one man uses to rate a guy, you may not.) Some of the more seasoned in fandom may think Henry Armstrong is the greatest fighter of all time, given his wins and being able to move up from one weight to the other. Back in the day when there was only one champion and there were ten pounds between weight divisions… I have only seen clips of “Homicide” Hank fight so this will certainly hinder his claiming the number one spot, but you could make quite a case for him and wouldn’t be wrong.

There’s something else I didn’t consider in terms of looking at aged film of fighters from another decade…. The film footage doesn’t read the same as it does today. So to look at a fighter’s style where he goes from moving real slow to excessively fast at almost convulsing speeds, doesn’t display a fighter’s style accurately… so you must also rely on the history of the fighter, similar styles you have seen throughout your viewing of boxing and you also have to do what dinosaur-ologists do: make an intelligent guess compared to the more “evolved” version of fighter we see today. This leads me to another question… has boxing really evolved anyway? We’d like to think so, but I guess this is a question for another time.

Having said that, in NO PARTICULAR ORDER, (because the only one that counts is #1) we’re off…

1. Jack Johnson – Wiped out any- and everybody put before him… Fought during a time of complete and utter hostility toward a black man… and that was the norm. In fact, he probably heard the word “nigger” so often that he thought it was the name his mother gave him. Watching the film of him let’s you know that he was pretty slick and advanced for a fighter in that era… he used subtle movements, feints and other excellent technical abilities even fighters of today don’t use, like parrying, for example. He also, like Ali, used a strong personality as a form of effective offense. The kind of personality that takes a fighter to a different level… a level most boxers are not used to fighting, and given it was the first time for most of his opponents at that “altitude” (they had the hopes of pretty much all of white America that followed boxing on his shoulders), that type of pressure didn’t help. So, a man that is able to function effectively under the type of hostile circumstances that Jack did, you would think that would be enough to garner the #1 spot; but truth be told, I am not convinced that boxing had evolved enough to the point that all fighters were that advanced and many guys probably trained about as often as your neighborhood stumblebum or saloon brawler. Could I see Jack beating Joe Louis? Muhammad Ali? Joe Frazier? Riddick Bowe? Boxing had really just raised itself up out of the bare-knuckle fighting days and to tell you the truth, they didn’t throw many punches for fear of hurting the hands, not the other guy’s head. So how can you hone your craft if you can’t throw as many punches as you need to in training, never mind build up the stamina and endurance to fight 3 minutes of every round? This lack of training and fighting evidence leads me to say no. Maybe Johnson’s top-10 and obviously a knowledgeable and strong willed individual with characteristic traits that in and of themselves would help defeat the modern-day champions, but he would need more than that to defeat the best of the best of all-time.

2. Joe Louis – The first thing you need to recognize about Joe Louis would be his remarkable power and his willingness to fight everybody. Then you would need to acknowledge his personality, so stoic and graceful in victory as well as defeat. The fact that he has one of the most amazing records in sports – 23 knockouts in 27 title defenses – the most title defenses in the game (?) – but look a little below the surface and you gotta question the opposition… not that he had any control over who he was fighting… and generally you can only fight who is put in front of you… (Larry Holmes was an amazing fighter, BUT he doesn’t make the list due to the caliber of fighters he defended the title against. Holmes’ “Frazier” was Ernie Shavers.) Then you go into the fact that Louis was in dire trouble against guys that weren’t reputed to be that dangerous (Billy Conn)… getting blown out in a fight (during your prime) isn’t going to help matters either (Schmeling 1). Let’s throw Joe’s ability into the deep end and see if it swims… Joe Louis and Big George Forman… what do you think happens? Do Joe’s short powerful punches get inside the hulking Forman’s gargantuan swings and chop him down or will Forman’s devastating early round assault have The Bomber imploding before he gets out of the first round? We can’t guarantee either… Same with Louis vs. Tyson… Heck, Louis and Holyfield. There are similarities in style yet Holyfield was more fluid and probably took a better punch… then, if you want to go pound-for-pound, put Louis in with Sugar Ray Robinson, Leonard, Duran, Whittaker… case closed. Louis makes the list due to his amazing record of title defenses, but for ability/flexibility, he had one way of fighting… and there’s an old adage that was never more apropos than it is here… “that which can’t bend breaks.”

3. Pernell Whitaker – “Sweet Pea” is the most underrated, underappreciated fighter to ever box, period. His talent was so superior to everyone he fought, people had no idea what they were seeing. He had everything Roy Jones had, but without the punch (but better defense). Everything Leonard had but without the charisma (but better technical boxer). Everything Ali had but without the personality (but better body puncher). The only thing “negative” you could say about him was he couldn’t punch THAT hard. And if you can’t hurt your opponent, your opponent begins to get brave and when they get brave, you got problems. People like Jake LaMotta and Tommy Hearns and Holyfield, who aren’t afraid to take a couple in order to land one, love fighting guys like this… but a study in frustration and an exercise in futility is what they are really in for. Trying to hit Pernell is like shadowboxing. Sure, he’s been dropped, but even Ali was dropped by Sonny Banks AND Henry Cooper, so Whitaker being dropped by Roger “The Black Mamba” Mayweather, who could punch like poison, is no shame. Here’s the ultimate, Ali vs. Pernell… This is no Camacho vs. Howard Davis (although both these dudes could do their thing). Both Ali and Pernell, as well as having frustratingly effective defenses, also have viciously competitive sides that when awoken, you wish they did own a one punch knockout punch to put you out of your misery. Here’s how good he was: Pernell had to have a full-blown substance abuse issue before he lost a fight as far as I can tell and he fought anyone who would wanna fight him, on their terms and won. Like Ali, fistic perfection, and if you told me that pound-for-pound in the ring he would beat Ali, you would have a lot of ammo to back your claim.

4. Rocky Marciano – He did retire as heavyweight champ undefeated, but with claims of having wins over relatives and such against him, things can get spotty. But that’s all hearsay. We’ll deal with fact. Boxing’s “free trade act” hadn’t really been enacted. Because the business was a “controlled” one, a fighter with the right “persuasions” could easily avoid stiff competition against deserving fighters… (hey, don’t they do that today as well? Ok, but at least today you could vie for a different title... See, there is a reason for the “alphabet organizations” after all. Proving everything that does exist, exists for a reason). Rocky had wars with Ezzard Charles and Jersey Joe Walcott who were amazing fighters but small heavyweights well as past their prime. Joe Louis was considerably past his prime as well. Rocky and his opponents’ size may not have anything to do with the pound-for-pound ratings but ability does. Rocky never fought a fighter that could stick and move or brought considerable power along with various other talents. I hate to say the word “safe” but if you make it to home plate without having to hustle… well, maybe his opponents weren’t ever favored to win. Super fighters fight super fighters when both are at their peak, and I cannot find one fighter on Rocky’s record that is a super fighter AT HIS PEAK. Rock was strong, had a high tolerance for pain, apparently took a great shot, unbelievable endurance and could punch like a f%#&*@g mule kick. But picture Rock against Wilfredo Benitez, Roberto Duran, Pernell, or any of the Sugar Ray’s. … this list can go on for sometime and I am not here to denigrate Marciano. Larry Holmes was inconsiderate saying Rocky couldn’t carry his jockstrap, but really, take a look at fight footage and picture Rocky fighting Larry Holmes. Marciano was excellent given the tools he developed against the opponents he fought, but to consider him pound-for-pound/the greatest of all time, well, NO.

5. Sugar Ray Robinson – Unbeatable at welterweight, he moved up to middle and was able to do amazing things… Had methods of communication been developed to the point they are today, the sky would have been the limit for his earning potential. At first you don’t know what to believe… your grandfather would tell you things about him that was sure to get the “tongue in cheek” reaction from you. Stories of his fights can be made to sound legendary. But everything you would hear coming through your radio offering the blow-by-blow wasn’t hyperbole… Sugar Ray, “the dancing man, as they used to call him, gliding ever so effortlessly to the right, you’d almost think he had skates on… But Fullmer’s been putting on the pressure and getting to Ray consistently now. Gene is just too big and too strong… OH, Fullmer is going to take a 10 count on this one. He was nailed by a perfectly timed left hook and he is out, he won’t make it up!” The most beautiful thing about the Sugarman was his originality… oh he could fight… go to the body, head, throw any combination you could dream of… knock a man out backing up and all without getting his hair too mussed up! Ray’s style was so crowd-pleasing with his ability to make something so brutal look so beautiful, he was the epitome of nature. He also took an unbelievable punch… and that’s where gravity comes into play. Ray unfortunately took too many of them. And that was his biggest shortcoming. In the department of defense he lacked, BIG TIME. It’s almost like his trainers didn’t believe there was such a thing as punch drunk syndrome. I guess boxing still was in its infancy and it’s not like the medical profession was voicing its concerns for the professional boxer and his “sort.” No one ever seemed to have a problem getting to Ray; their biggest concern was getting out of his way… and what a huge problem that was. Of all the fighters of yesteryear, Ray is the most modern and advanced, his style plays in any arena, but the porous defense… the room for error is thinner when you get to the top and when it’s all even, hand speed, reflexes, power, conditioning, attributes like defensive capability start to come into play and against a fighter that could do it all, Ray is in for a long fight, trading punches even the viewer would feel through the TV screen.  Robinson Ali? Sugar1-Sugar2? Sugar-Jones? Sugar-Pryor? Sugar-Holyfield? Sugar-Marciano? Sugar-anyone… he definitely gets my “most crowd-pleasing” (Pryor and Hearns are close seconds though) though edged out of the Greatest Of All Time title by the thinnest of margins.

6. Evander Holyfield – This man is like your pet pit-bull, just point to whom you want him to fight and let him go, he will die trying. The type of heart, spirit and ability Holyfield possesses can never ever be sold short. In fact, Evander’s “overachiever/underdog/giant slayer” worked so well for him that people forgot this man was the REAL DEAL. He knew how to fight and had the technical skills of fighters from a bygone era. But there was much more to Evander’s game than courage… to see him execute against Dwight Muhammad Quawi (a hardened and proven champ that was chopping up everyone) over 15 rounds in their first fight… and Holyfield only had something like 12 fights at the time, his roll and counter, his ability to stand in the direct line of fire with some of the most powerful punchers boxing has ever seen, absorb their power and dish it back twofold, that’s the stuff legends are made of. It’s this opinion that what limited Holyfield’s ability as a heavyweight boxer was his weight-training program. In order to bulk up to heavyweight, he had to put on muscle… but someone neglected to remind Evander that boxing is about how often and hard you can punch, not how often and how much you can lift, so I think the weights really inhibited his punch and performance endurance and caused him to tire so rapidly in fights against Bowe (for example) when he was stopped in the 8th round. He had other fights were he almost refused to let his hands go in combination. He could beat the big men, but would lose or have a lot of trouble with a smaller faster man because he had more armor to lug around. Weights add “perceived” strength but zap your spiritual strength and often he went “quietly into the night” against fighters that weren’t interested in doing nothing but jab and move, or jab and hold. Scurrying away with timid decisions, careful not to awaken the sleeping dog. One thing for sure: at any weight, Evander Holyfield can never be discounted. Physically he is as gifted as mentally he is resolute. He can go toe-to-toe with anyone, BUT, should he be fighting a boxer with good wheels, not so interested in physical collisions, Evander’s in big trouble. He can box, but his true nature is that of a fighter and this is his undoing with types like Benitez, Ali, Leonard and so forth. How is this for a mega super fight… Joe Frazier (Ali 1 version) vs. Evander Holyfield (mid to late 80’s version)

7. Roberto Duran His ability is legendary. He wiped out the lightweights, skipped the super lightweights and jumped to welter and beat the golden goose, Sugar Ray Leonard, continued up and knocked out the champ Davey Moore in the super welterweight division and then took undisputed middleweight champ Marvelous Marvin Hagler to the limit in a close title fight… any slugger, or fighter, that threw round house punches would get eaten alive by this man. Definitely one of the greatest DEFENSIVE fighters to ever lace up the gloves, he was also extremely aggressive and had amazing dexterity with the mitts… here’s something you don’t see which I saw Duran execute… a guy throws a left hook at you, you move into and under the punch and score with your own left hook to the body AT THE SAME TIME… you have to see it! The man was a fistic virtuoso and surely the greatest fighter to ever lace up the gloves. Picture him as a heavyweight – he would eat up Holmes, Forman, Liston, Frazier, Tyson… Duran and Sugar Ray Robinson? That’s a fight! WAIT A MINUTE… But not Ali and certainly not the Ali fight breed. Make Duran move his feet as he had to do against the Viruet brothers, against Zeferino Gonzales, against Sugar Ray Leonard in the second fight, and it’s a new day. If you can move your feet and move your hands at the same time… you are going to do very well against Roberto. Intelligent straight punching boxers were his Achilles heel, always were. With a shortcoming that obvious, no way could he be considered pound-for-pound. OK, no mas on that.

8. Sugar Ray Leonard I have to be careful with Sugar 2, because I grew up on him, idolized him, was fed a steady stream of him from 7UP commercials to sales of all sorts of product. But I gotta say this about Ray… THE MAN COULD FIGHT! As much as he ushered in the media friendly-packaged smile – mega watt nice guy – he had a wicked competitive streak that you would never want to go up against unless you thrive on that kinda thing. He KO’d the Hitman, when the Hitman was KOing everyone… and continued to afterwards. Lost to Duran, but came back and thumped him right away. I mean, as a boxer, if you can make a man – and not just any man, a great fighter –consciously quit, to your intellectual side it can be as gratifying as knocking him cold. But we know the savage side of the brain always wins out. We prefer to see a man take the 10-count. Leonard beat Marcus Geraldo at middleweight, in 1980… and that’s BEFORE Marvin Hagler beat Geraldo… AND Sugar was a welterweight, Marcus a legit middleweight. Leonard had speed and power… (often he sacrificed it wisely unwilling to go toe-to-toe) was amazing working the body and the head, had amazing reflexes and that certain quality that makes you feel so assured going into battle. A man with a heart and fight spirit like this you always want on your team. He was to boxing what Jordan was to basketball, that simple. Looking at his talent, you could put him in with any fighter from any era at any weight and be relatively secure betting the kid’s college fund… AND your retirement fund, that he will win… But is he my choice for the #1? Alas, no, and I will tell you why: the one loss to Roberto Duran showed me something… psychologically he can be rattled, not often, but it can and did happen and #2, he didn’t adapt in the way you thought he would to win the fight… he kept trying to force something that wasn’t there for him… That looping overhand right… so ineffective against Duran… gotta be laser straight, like he did in the second fight. He fought grade-A opposition and defeated them convincingly and with style… Cream rises to the top, and the Sugar almost made it too. Imagine Leonard vs. Ali… WOW!

9. Roy Jones Jr. – What can you say about a man who possessed god-like instincts – reflexes, power and ability? It really was unreal watching him throw triple and quadruple left hooks against opponents that were otherwise champions if not for him. He went into a fight as Ali did against Cleveland “Big Cat” Williams and fought the perfect fight, nearly landing every punch he threw while not getting hit AT ALL… Knocking out his opponent in the 6th round… maybe he had an “aversion” to being hit that made a couple fights hard to watch, but if you have that ability why not? Every attribute you would want of your fighter, Roy possessed, with the exception of one thing that became more apparent as he continued fighting… a defense. As Howard Cosell would say about Thomas Hearns pre-Sugar 1: “Defense? His defense was his offense.” Which is absolutely cool and crowd-pleasing until you come upon someone with an equally potent offense and what do ya do then? Roy’s offense was amazing speed, intelligence, a healthy fear of getting hit and amazing fistic gymnastics, multiplied by numbing power… His defense consisted of putting his hands to the sides of his head and letting guys whack away at his ribs like a side of beef as long as you don’t give up the headshots. No slipping, ducking, not even the winged feet to provide different angles, nothing. Whenever Roy would punch, his head was ALWAYS right on top of his shoulders, which were always over his hips, which were always over his feet. In other words, as an opponent you didn’t have to see his head to know where he is, you simply had to punch where you last saw his head and BINGO… That’s what we are seeing now, unfortunately. But make no bones about it, when Roy was at the top of his game… as a middleweight, it is virtually impossible to see him lose to anyone fighter… I seen him break unbendable guys. But what about Roy vs. Duran? Leonard? Ali? Hearns? Robinson? All great fights and their outcomes can change depending on what day of the week it is, but alas… Roy don’t get the brass ring either for all the aforementioned champs had potent offenses as well. Check it, everyone’s chin gets tested at some point and that being the case most of the aforementioned passed with flying colors. Roy didn’t. And why didn’t he ever have a nickname? That always bothered me.

10. Muhammad Ali- “I’m the Greatest”…And if you have to ask why, you don’t really know your boxing.

add to Facebook add to Myspace add to Digg add to Mixx add to Linkedin add to Yahoo Buzz

Contact Michael Olajide @ TheSweetScience.com


TOMMY RAINONE:  VERY GOOD ARTICLE AND VERY STRONG POINTS FOR ALL 10 AND I LEARNED A FEW THINGS AS A STUDENT OF THE GAME THAT I DIDNT REALLY FULLY NOTICE ABOUT A COUPLE OF THESE FIGHTERS AND TRUTH BE TOLD AS U TOLD IT ROY REALLY HAD NO DEFENCE AND W OUT ME REAPEATING MOST OF WHAT U SAID U SUMMED UP THE REASONS VERY WELL- IT HAS SHOWED AT HE HAS SLOWED DOWN W BOTH AGE AND MOVING UP IN WEIGHT CLASSES AS HE DOES NOT THROW AS MANY PUNCHES AS HE DID AT MIDDLE AND SUPER MIDDLE AND WHEN UR OFFENCE IS UR DEFENCE AND UR OFFENCE SLOWS CONSIDERABLY THEN THERE GOES YOUR DEFENCE- U ALSO POINTED OUT SOMETHING I AND MANY PEOPLE TEND TO FORGET OR I SHOULD SAY IGNORE, ROBINSON DIDNT HAVE THE BEST DEFENCE EITHER AND ALTHOUGH HE HAD A HELL OF A CHIN HE WAS NOT HARD 2 FIND- UR # 10 SAYS IT ALL W OUT SAYING A WORD AND I AGREE 100 PERCENT- GREAT ARTICLE
Thursday Sep 21, 2006 02:30:13 AM
Mark:  Personally,sugar ray robinson stands apart from the above mentioned,he stands on mount olympus.............alone.
Thursday Sep 21, 2006 02:30:56 AM
lawrencemurphy:  I would have to say sugar ray robinson was the greatest fighter of all time .Over 100 fights before he lost for the first time ,to jake la motta and avenged that defeat..middleweight champion five times unprecedented. and also came so close to winning the light-heavyweight title but for heat exaustion.couldnt lastt the distance..
Thursday Sep 21, 2006 04:51:52 AM
Warren Hulley:  Hi Michael, My name is Warren Hulley, I am a boxing trainer from Johannesburg, South Africa. I think your article on the greatest of all time fighters is well researched and indicates that you have studied the respective fighters mentioned. Assessing different fighters ablity and comparing it to hypothetical opponents is a very subjective thing. While I feel your analysis is very insightful (your own involvement as a professional boxer comes through here), however there is an aspect of this speculative equation that is almost always overlooked, the trainer or coach. When young men decide to join a gym and try their hand at pugilism, their is generally a devoted coach who is willing to impart his knowledge and skills to his newfound student. Normally these novices, at this point, have no idea of how little they know about the sweet science. Through trial and error and a great deal of patience the coach guides them from rigid and fumbling robots into (hopefully, depending on the ability of the coach) superior atheletes, who can deliver virtuoso performances. In my years as a trainer I have noticed that the most successful boxers I have worked with are the ones who have dedicated the most time and effort to their art. No naturals here! As much as certain atheletes appear to be more talented (gifted) than others, apon closer inspection, it becomes evident that more time was spent by these fighters on the essential ingredients that make them so superior to others. The boxers are the ones who are the stars! and rightfully so. However, should the star fail to deliver the goods, his sub-par performance is usually attributed to an error in strategy or poor preparation by a coach will soon be replaced. I beleive that in clashes between great fighters, oftentimes the corner makes the difference. An astute chief second, through hundreds of hours spent with his charge, knows when he performs at optimum levels and more importantly WHY. He monitors all aspects of the training regimine in preparation for the contest., choosing certain sparring partners over others and adjusting exercise workouts in an effort to fine-tune his fighter. The dietary requirements, when to abstain from sex, and dozens of other considerations that go unnoticed by the casual fight fan, are made by the trainer. When victory is dependant on so many decisions made by one person, methinks it as a travesty of justice not to apportion credit to them on the pound for pound lists. Next to the names of all the great fighters should be the names of the great team leaders who cared for, sacrificed for, and lived for the achievement of goals negotiated before there were lawyers, fans and pay -per-view dates. Consider the legacy of the "Greatest" if Angelo Dundee had not split a damaged glove further, of Sugar Ray Leonard if he had boxed as instructed Duran 1 and retired for good when the relationship with his mentor soured (What was his post Dundee record?). Had Mike Tyson stayed with Kevin Rooney how would history have judged him? The list of boxers that have benefitted from the expertise and experience of their trainers is endless, let us make space to honor these often unsung heroes of our noble sport. Thanks for a thought provoking article, I am happy to see that your talents are not completely lost to boxing. Kind regards, Warren Hulley
Thursday Sep 21, 2006 07:35:22 AM
phil siebert:  hey silk...great article...excellent comment on difficulty of rating fighters or other athletes by looking at 70 year old films of matches...jack johnson films make him look like a puppet jerking around, just as babe ruth films make him move like a fat bobblehead doll even though he was the most dominant player against competition of his era of all time...marciano's opponents were no more silly than alphabet belt ranking & "mandatory challenger #1 rated" fighters that you never have heard of...in the pre-70's era, guys would fight every couple months rather that every couple years...NOMINEE FOR BEST FIGHTER OF ALL TIME: danny kaye as "burleigh sullivan" in "the kid from brooklyn"(1946 movie)...the milkman who knocks out the champ...later, phil
Thursday Sep 21, 2006 10:43:06 AM
Mike South:  I agree with many of your points. I disagree with you 2 points... 1st, Johnson lost legitimately to Joe Choynski. 2nd, RJJ did have defense, namely his feet (check out the Thulane Malinga fight for some great lateral movement), and his ability to parry punches. This footwork disappeared at Super-Middle and suddenly Roy started going straight back to the ropes. The parrying disappeared too, in favour of that bizarre outstretched left or right arm. I agree with you that a Light-Heavy Roy had no defence, but a middlewieght Roy had one or two tricks up his sleeve. It took him 15 years to get hit clean - he had to have had some defense! I give you big points on your comments on SRR. Everyone calls him P4P, no-one acknowleges that he is a 5x loser of the middleweight title, everyone says 'yes but he was P4P at welterweight' but where's the film? Also, big props for the segment on Sweet Pea. Probably the best articulation of what he was about that I've ever read. Cheers.
Thursday Sep 21, 2006 11:35:33 AM
Anonymous user:  Just Remember with my list that I was born in 1982. So I haven't really seen tapes of that many great old time fighters in boxing matches. But I do think that my greatest boxers lists is better then Michael Olajide's list. 1.)Muhammad Ali Honestly think about it is there really any fighter that could beat him in his prime. 2.)Sugar Ray Robinson (Muhammad Ali's idol enough said) 3.) Sugar Ray Leonard (Who didn't he beat) 4.) Jack Johnson (Had better defense then Joe Louis) 5.)Marvin Hagler (beat Duran, Hearns and arguably Sugar Ray Leonard) 6.) Lennox Lewis (would definitely beat Marciano, Frazier and Louis, He is just too big and strong for them) 7.) Larry Holmes (it's not his fault there was no great opposiition during his prime) 8.)George Foreman (To big and to strong for Marciano and Frazier) 9.)Joe Louis (Champ for a decade) 10) Roy Jones Jr (Amazing in his prime) Honorable Mention: Mike Tyson, Pernell Whitaker, Bernard Hopkins, Joe Frazier, Rocky Marciano and Julio Cesar Chavez.
Thursday Sep 21, 2006 02:26:29 PM
William A Major:  roberto duran was the greatest of them all! no doubt in my mind. i dont care what leonard did in the first fight,follow the instructions or whatever,heor anyone else would never had beaten him on that night,that was the real duran. we all know the so called no mas fight was a BS call.so duran was a mental case ,he was pissed off and did the unthinkable. but what he did and who he fought after that even, to me ,the performances against moore and barkley,(that one was unbelievable) at that age,weight and time in his career ,make him, to me of course, the most underrated boxer and the GREATEST fighter of them all , bar none. thank you-
Thursday Sep 21, 2006 08:40:56 PM
boricua:  Sir, you forgot two boxers that were much better than Holyfield or Whitaker, those were Carlos Monzon and Wilfredo Gomez..Close my case...
Friday Sep 22, 2006 06:29:37 AM
David Payne:  Henry Armstrong. Terrific article though Michael, loved the insight.
Friday Sep 22, 2006 09:02:15 AM
Joey Benedetti:  P4p is so subjective, but that never stops me from creating and re-creating lists the more I learn about the greats. Thought your list made some good points on some great fighters, but personnaly I would need to have Willie Pep, Sam Langford, Eder Jofre and Harry Greb on my p4p list. Great insight on the fighters you mentioned.
Friday Sep 22, 2006 11:41:33 AM
123:  William A Major how is Duran the greatest fighter of all time when he lost to Sugar Ray Leonard and Marvin Hagler. And the greatest fighter of all time wouldn't quit a fight.
Friday Sep 22, 2006 01:10:44 PM
chris leonard:  Good article. The more people who read this, the more opinions will arise and disagree, but that's what a P4P list is...an opinion. You can't accurately gauge fighters out of weightclass accurately, at least I don't feel like you can. However, I've always felt like Muhammad Ali was overrated. There is no doubt in my mind that he has done so much for the wonderful sport of boxing that you could easily admit that he is the posterchild for boxing who may only be rivaled by the success of Mike Tyson and Oscar De La Hoya with the numbers they've put up. But, I think an increasing number of people would admit that Lennox Lewis would destroy Muhammad Ali in a fight for a number of reasons. For a man THAT large, we moved really well on his feet! Had a good enough defense/chin (with the questionable knockout loss to Rahman of course taken into consideration) to go toe to toe with ANYONE. More importantly though, he could box very well for someone his size, and could put together great punches and combo's with immense strength with the reach that would put basically anyone at bay. As you said, Sugar Ray Leonard vs. Ali would be a great fight to watch, but as far as P4P, neither of which could stand up to Lewis. Ali and Leonard both fought men of great strength at their respective weights in fights with Foreman(arguably one of the hardest punchers of all time) and Duran, but I seriously doubt stamina or mental toughness would come into play in a fight against Lewis. Ali's rope a dope style wouldn't work against lewis, and it wouldn't take many shots to the face from Lewis to show a change of character in Ali in about the 8th round. I thnk the arguement of Ali being the greatest is usually made by people that fell in love with boxing while he was an active and great fighter. De la hoya changed the game while he's been active and has defeated champions and icon's alike in 6 weightclasses. Fought all comers and people that thought he would definitely get knocked out against (Chavez, Vargas, Trinidad etc...) but when people look at De La Hoya 20 years from now, he may not look like the man he does now because of his record on paper. Ali had such an impact on boxing and our nation with his skills, that people put him on a pedestal of the "greatest" but as far as actual skills, I think they over look the fact that he can and had been beaten. There are also boxers that may never make it on lists of boxings greatest P4P because of the weighclasses they fought in that were amazing fighters in their own right however like Ricardo Lopez (51-0 at his very young retirement) that because of his stature, you almost can't match up against anyone P4P. As boxing moves forward though, there are lighter boxers getting put on our current P4P rankings such as Morales, Pacquiau and Barrera, but the smaller men of our beloved sport do get overlooked which is why I don't like these all time lists. Also, people like Winky Wright get thrown out because they aren't flashy fighters and don't have amazing knockout power but is this not the sweet science we are talking about? A year ago, Bernard Hopkins ruled the P4P rankings but could he have pentrated Winky's defense and stiff jab over 12 rounds? Probably not... Either way, this is a good list that you've compiled, and maybe you've downgraded Sugar Ray Robinsons skills a little even with the credit you've given him, but keep in mind Lennox Lewis next time you're thinking about your list. God bless.
Saturday Sep 23, 2006 06:28:40 PM
Jake B:  Good Article but like many have said, very subjective & wide open to opinion & preferences. For example Marvin Hagler was better than half the fighters on this list, held a rare undisputed title for 6 yrs, 12 defences. Wins over Hearns & Duran & questionable disputed loss to Ray Leonard. Marciano's ability & accomplishments were not even close to MMH's, yet his name is not on this list. Good reading...Tx - JB
Saturday Sep 23, 2006 06:45:52 PM
olajide:  Hey WARREN, if you gave trainers more "props" for developing talent, they would have to be as responsible for their talents' loss. And there a have been more unsuccessful boxers than successful ones. PHIL, "the kid from brooklyn" I have never seen but I am gonna look for that one. Danny kaye was a actor/dancer, right? This ought to be interesting. Who'd win between him and Sammy Davis Jr (the Golden Boy) MIKE, you are right, Roy did have excellent foot movement which aided him defensively... but then again, maybe he used his feet to create better punching angles. BORICUA, you mention Monzon and he was a great one and when you said Gomez it reminded me that I left one Salvador Sanchez off the list, now THAT was a great fighter! Thank you everyone for your comments, yes Pound 4 Pound is subjective opinion but it's always great to discuss this... takes ya back to another time.
Saturday Sep 23, 2006 10:25:55 PM
tyson 4 eva:  Well, id have to say iside my head it is mike tyson that takes number 1 spot. But iknow that he may have a few faults and that his carrer can be picked apart very easily. So in reality it would probably have to be Ali that is number 1. ( i never thought id ever admit it) But, the fight i would love to see the most ever is Tyson Ali, I think it would pan out just like the Ali Frazier fights
Tuesday Sep 26, 2006 05:53:10 AM
Haris:  To Chris Leonard, I find your remarks about Lennox Lewis rather entertaining. I have never seen a more boring and lifeless heavyweight in my life. Lewis deserves credit for what he has acheived, but to even mention him in the same sentence as Muhammad Ali is totally absurd. Granted, lewis had power, but thats all he had, he wasnt swift and agile, he had a glass jaw, as proven by Oliver Mcall and Hasim Rahman. The world has witnessed Ali overcome an array of boxing styles, from south-paws to toe- to -toe sluggers. Lewis had not the temperament, the charisma, the dexterity, the endurance, the class, the agility of ALI. Like with all of Ali's heavier oponents, Ali would have stung away with lighting jabs, and its all over. Lewis didnt have the conviction in his boxing. Lets all face the facts here, Lewis may have beaten holyfield and tyson, but just look at the performances of both aformentioned fighters, there wasnt even the slightest hint of their former selves. Lewis fought a washed out tyson, and an ageing holyfield. Results would have been different had Lewis fought tyson around the time he was going at it with holyfield. With all due respect to Lewis, it is silly to list him anywhere near the Greatest of all time. MUHAMMAD ALI is undeniably the Greatest with Mike tyson not far behind. (that is if we put aside his notorious antics). With regard to ALI - Tyson, again, ALI displayed, on countless occassions his ability to outbox, outclass and most importantly out-wit fighters of the standard of Mike tyson, although i will say, Tyson would have given ALI a hard time to say the least, but ALIs ability to adapt to all situations and endure punishment would have him come out victorious. "ALI BOOMAYE"
Thursday Sep 28, 2006 09:28:59 PM
Chris Leonard:  Like I said, opinions are opinions... To put Tyson in the same category is absurd then as well if you count the fact that he lost to every good fighter he fought. He fought scrubs his whole career, with the exception of most of his losses. Granted he was quick, and strong...obviously, he is not a great BOXER. Tyson was exposed for the fraud that he was by buster douglas of all people, and almost every other decent fighter afterwards. It's a lot like what happened with Nasim Hammed, once revered as an amazing boxer, until he faced Marco Antonio Barrera and got blown out, just like Roy Jones Jr., ducked the best competition his whole career until 2 career back to back knockouts at the hands of tarver and johnson showed his true colors. You call it age, it's more like being exposed. To say that Lewis would be jabbed to death by Ali is ridiculous, Ali would have a lot more trouble than the broken jaw he received at the hands of Norton if he fought Lewis. Lewis is MUCH better than Norton was and all 3 of his fights with Norton were extremely close. Believe what you like... God bless
Friday Sep 29, 2006 02:53:48 PM
Chris Leonard:  Like I said, opinions are opinions... To put Tyson in the same category is absurd then as well if you count the fact that he lost to every good fighter he fought. He fought scrubs his whole career, with the exception of most of his losses. Granted he was quick, and strong...obviously, he is not a great BOXER. Tyson was exposed for the fraud that he was by buster douglas of all people, and almost every other decent fighter afterwards. It's a lot like what happened with Nasim Hammed, once revered as an amazing boxer, until he faced Marco Antonio Barrera and got blown out, just like Roy Jones Jr., ducked the best competition his whole career until 2 career back to back knockouts at the hands of tarver and johnson showed his true colors. You call it age, it's more like being exposed. To say that Lewis would be jabbed to death by Ali is ridiculous, Ali would have a lot more trouble than the broken jaw he received at the hands of Norton if he fought Lewis. Lewis is MUCH better than Norton was and all 3 of his fights with Norton were extremely close. Believe what you like... God bless
Friday Sep 29, 2006 03:45:23 PM
Haris:  Chris i totally agree, opinions will be opinions. You state very fair points, but lets not exclude or overlook the affect, personal circumstances can have on an individuals performance in any discipline, across any domain. Im in no way making excuses for Tyson's shortfalls, but clearly people go through turbulent times, some deal with it better than others. Tyson brings his troubles to the ring and clearly pays the price. With regard to Prince Naseem, he had a very promising career ahead of him, however his pre-fight interview said it all. He prepared himself for a loss. For him to use the words, "IF i win this fight, i will prove to myself that im great". he was in self doubt from the beggining. Also, lets not take anything away from Barrera, he is one of the best in his division. Anyhow, like you said opinions will opinions. Hopefully you wont have reason to doubt my success, should i make it big. All the best!
Friday Oct 6, 2006 03:46:14 PM
Kent:  Is it too soon to include Floyd Mayweather Jr?? If whitaker makes the list, I gotta put Floyd in there as well.
Monday Oct 9, 2006 06:48:59 PM
chrisleonard:  I've been thinking about the Mayweather arguement lately too Kent, but I think it IS too soon for the fact that his career isn't over yet. He IS campaigning pretty hard to be on that list, but look at the fighters like De La Hoya that could've easily been regarded as potential candidates on that list with the way they were beating champions left and right and being unbeaten themselves, but then you look at his record now before his career is even over and you'd have to disagree. Only God knows was Floyd's career will end up like, but it's great watching the potential in what could be the greatest boxer of all time in real time.
Thursday Oct 12, 2006 05:25:27 PM
Randy De La o:  Take Whitaker off the list and it will be more credible, and move Duran up a few notches. Regarding 123's comment about Duran's loss to Hagler, give the guy a break, Duran was a aging natural lightweight, past his prime, that held his own with Hagler, a natural middleweight and all time great, losing by a point , if I remember correctly. And where is Henry Armstrong, he certainly belongs on anyones top ten. I would also have Chavez on this list, especially since Whitaker is on it. Chavez was on the downslide when they met, and dispite the "Draw", Chavez was a better overall fighter and had a much more accomplished career than the extremely overrated Whitaker.
Saturday Oct 28, 2006 10:03:36 PM
Scott B:  One thing I find interesting to explore when I'm contemplating P4P lists is: which criteria are more important? These are some of the categories we use to assess fighters regardless of weight, in no particular order: 1. Wins/losses 2. Opponents 3. Style 4. Titles Personally I think opponents should be by far and above the most important category. Obviously this is good for those who faught in golden eras like Ali or Leonard and not for 'bum of the month' champions like Joe Lewis and Holmes, but shouldn't a fighter be judged solely by his acheivements and if he hasn't beaten lots of other top class fighters, for whatever reason, doesn't that mean his acheivements are less impressive than someone who has? Look at ODLH's record and he's faught a hell of a lot of big names. Style is the most difficult one to factor in, but there's no doubt that the more offensively minded and flashy fighters are more entertaining to watch. Again match ups count for a lot, but this brings in people like Zale, Graziano, Basilio (who was in EVERY Ring magazine fight of the year from '55 to '59), Ali, Frazier, Barrera, Morales, Pacquiao and of course Gatti. I'd be interested to know how you prioritise the categories of assessment when contemplating your P4P lists. Cheers.
Friday Nov 3, 2006 10:21:18 AM
Neil G:  What about Larry Holmes? For what it's worth I think a peak Larry Holmes beats Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Tyson and Lewis. A washed up, one-eyed LH was only a couple of points away from Holyfield in 92. The Holmes of 82 would have won a wide decision over Holyfield or Tyson. Manny Steward said LH would have given Lennox lewis a lot more trouble than Ali and I agree. Threw more punches than Ali, punched harder and had an equally big heart and an even better jab. P4P Holmes cannot be ignored.
Friday Nov 10, 2006 06:35:25 PM
Mokada Yako:  Hi Michael, you were always the most intellectual of the pro-boxers - I'm glad you're an educator now. I had great joy watching your rise to the top and shared your heartache in the Hearns and Barkley fights. One of the most thrilling moments for me was when you floored Hearns! Man! I really thought you could've finished him off! IMHO you needed a coach like Dundee or Steward - something we lack in Canada - to hone that great talent and spirit of yours. (Look what Steward did for Lennox Lewis!) About the Top Ten - I have a couple of things to quibble with you about. First, how could you forget Mike Tyson and Lennox Lewis? In the 27 years since Ali's retirement, these are the only two heavies to unify the title AND defend it several times successfully. Mike was a phenom - remember the years 1985 to 1990? The guy seemed invinsible. Talk about offense as defense - this guy was a study in agression. As to Lewis - I think he's up there with Forman as hardest hitter ever. I've seen Forman on HBO speak with awe of Lewis's power. Speaking of Forman, I think he, Archie Moore and Bernard Hopkins deserve to be considered in a special category for longevity. How do boxers keep fighting the best in the world when their speed and reflexes are deteriorating? They rely on cunning and unconquerable heart. That's worth something. This brings me to my biggest disagreement with you on the Greatest P4P of all time. Ali is the Greatest in a category all by himself. He transcends boxing - he's beyond boxing. But P4P Greatest for me would be a toss-up between Sugar Ray Robinson and Roy Jones. Jones is the most naturally talented fighter I've ever seen. When his reflexes went, people like Tarver and Johnson were able to flatten him. But for my money, P4P Greatest is Jones. He even did things Robinson couldn't dream of doing - win light heavyweight and heavyweight titles - which says something about Jones' heart. Jones incredible talent was also his biggest disadvantage - he was boring to watch sometimes. You called it a "healthy fear of getting hit" - I call it ring smarts. But, hey, maybe you and I are not so far apart afterall - the only fighter you described as having "god-like instincts" was Jones. That says something too.
Sunday Jul 22, 2007 08:56:00 PM
jessi:  this is bull how none of you guys dont think tyson should be in the top. He was the best in his prime when he was with cus damato. When he had his head movement and his deadly left hook. He was the youngest heavyweight champion in the world. And was knocking out everyone in the first round. But then late in his career he starting loosing focus when he was with don king. Because he was cause he was changing coaches every week. And also robin givens didnt do anything for his carreer
Wednesday Jan 23, 2008 07:13:21 AM
jessi:  this is bull how none of you guys dont think tyson should be in the top. He was the best in his prime when he was with cus damato. When he had his head movement and his deadly left hook. He was the youngest heavyweight champion in the world. And was knocking out everyone in the first round. But then late in his career he starting loosing focus when he was with don king. Because he was cause he was changing coaches every week. And also robin givens didnt do anything for his carreer
Wednesday Jan 23, 2008 07:14:21 AM
Brian Zelley:  Seeing a list of ten with five heavyweights listed is troubling at best. To dismiss Henry Armstrong and include Jack Johnson is interesting logic, Now, when it comes to near perfect skills Willie Pep is one of the best Based just on footwork alone, he would rate in the top five. Add other factors together and he rates in the top three along with Sugar Ray Robinson and Henry Armstrong. And if one is going to toss Joe Louis in the top ten based on the title defenses issue. We may as well throw in light-heavyweight champion Archie Moore for good measure. Then there are those other great champions like Barney Ross, Tony Canzoneri, Benny Leonard, Harry Greb, Mickey Walker and Jommy Wilde. If we are going to stick to mainly post 1930"s fighters then no proper list is complete without Eder Jofre.
Tuesday Jun 2, 2009 02:53:05 AM
Mike Bourke:  Amazing that this blog is still going. If you happen to open it up after all these years, Michael, hello from Vancouver! Very good idea of Michael to have set some starting criteria. But it seems to me that heavyweights won't fare to well under the overriding criterion of pound-for-pound. Ali is the only heavyweight who might count as the best p4p fighter. But if we take away that constraint, then obviously only heavyweights would take the top spot. If we're meant to keep to the p4p standard, then we have to imagine Duran at his prime against the best fighters at the 132 lb level, especially since he had a very short reach even for a lightweight (60 inches if I recall), all the more astounding that, well past his prime!, he did so well climbing up the weight divisions. The remarks about Duran's defensive skills are spot on. A consideration when assessing the defensive skills of Sugar Ray Robinson, my vote for the greatest fighter/boxer of all time: His defensive skills, like Ali's, depended heavily on movement and responsive reactions and so naturally deteriorated or became more porous over time - not surprising in an era when boxers fought so frequently, with smaller gloves, often in more brutal fights and with less reprieve when things went badly, and in arguably the most competitive era. Duran and Robinson in their prime each seemed to bring nature itself into the ring, and I think that that illusion was served by the fact that their defensive skills (especially in Duran's case) were utterly inseparable from their fighting. I should add that in Robinson's era boxers who used their defensive skills to avoid fighting were actually warned by the official in the ring. Needless to say, no official would ever have had an opportunity to warn Duran.
Monday Aug 24, 2009 02:33:03 AM

Name: Email:  (will not be displayed, TSS Privacy, your email is required to autoapprove your comment)

Please be respectful, and do not use foul language in your comment

Discuss this article in the forum

  THESWEETSCIENCE.COM   More from the Top Team of Writers in the Fight Game ...
 
More from this Writer
Columns by Michael Olajide
 
Recent boxing Columns and News
•  Was Ward Looking For A Way Out From Green Fight? Team Ward Responds by Raymond Markarian
•  The Fighter Who Beats Manny Pacquiao Can't Be Manufactured, Part II by Frank Lotierzo
•  Mayweather, Mosley In Concert On Drug Testing
•  Evander Holyfield/Frans Botha Is A Go For April 10
 
 


TSS Video
Roger and Floyd Mayweather in LA talking about Mosley fight
  
Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins smack talking in L.A.
  
Oscar De La Hoya on Mosley-Mayweather fight and Manny Pacquiao
  
More Video
TSS Photo Archive

Angie And Goody...23 Years Later
Twenty three years later after they seconded Marvin Hagler and Ray Leonard in Las Vegas, Goody Petronelli and Angelo Dundee crossed paths again. This time, it was at Foxwoods. Photo/friend of TSS "The Iceman" John Scully reports there were only pleasantries exchanged. Goody didn't debate the split decision victory enjoyed by Leonard, which to this day Hagler disputes.

Round by Round Coverage
Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto
Fight aficionados, tune in for live, round by round coverage of the Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto welterweight championship on Saturday, November 14th beginning at 9 pm ET / 6 pm PT.

The Sweet Science Writers
The Sweet Science
Legal  | Privacy  |  Sitemap  |  Disclaimer  |  The Savage Science © 2004-2007 The Sweet Science Boxing.  All rights reserved. .