The Sweet Science
HOME ABOUT CONTACT
EnglishRussianChineseItalianDeutchFrenchSpanishPortugueseJapaneseKorean
The Sweet Science Boxing
Boxing Podcast Boxing RSS 
Terry Norris


Monday Feb 7, 2005

Terry Norris was a boxer-puncher supreme.

      Print this article     Email this article

'Terrible' Terry Norris: Boxing Excellence

By Patrick Kehoe

After having been decked in the second round and basically drubbed for four rounds, a desperate Sugar Ray Leonard came out in the fifth, throwing hard against WBC 154-pound champion Terry Norris, to the delight of the Madison Square Garden faithful. The sparse crowd of 7,458 rose from their seats, most of them imploring Leonard to break down the agile, combination hitting Norris. The young titleholder was supposed to have already gone gently horizontal into that good night of another Sugar Ray comeback. After all, Norris had been handpicked by the thirty-four year-old, five-time world champion - as had the classic New York venue - for the purposes of maximum credibility to be regained, atmospherics and theatrics ever at the command of the “Sugar Man.”

The problem manifesting itself as a physical and mental beating was that Terry Norris, three times beaten at twenty-three and given to mixing it up without the security of a granite chin, was also proving to be an athletic singularity, a marvel of dynamic motor capacity. Surging forward in the fifth, Leonard hit mostly air; his legendary ability to shoeshine an opponent with jarring combinations was being voided. Furtively, Leonard hit with some and missed with many more. Finally, Norris dropped his jabbing and dancing, Ali-light defensive posturing to unleash his signature left jab, right cross, left uppercut combination. Leonard’s tilted for attack head was not snug enough behind his left shoulder; when glove met the shell of his head, Leonard’s already puffy visage violently jerked toward the ring lights, as Norris then recalibrated in a micro instant hitting his boyhood hero’s midsection like he would a heavy bag. Thud! At the bell, Norris turned quickly to his corner. Leonard smiled after him almost hoping to catch Norris’ gaze. At that moment, Leonard knew he had deceived himself; he’d been dreaming. He really was in the ring with a slight variation on himself, a boxer-puncher supreme.

No, Terry Norris would not turn out to be Sugar Ray Leonard; but, he would prove himself an incredible talent, technically inventive, rigorously trained always, given to mental implosions, yet still a boxer of athleticism on a level only equaled by Roy Jones Jr. in the 1990s. He’d hit Leonard, while the former champion was splayed on all fours, having to travel almost 10 feet, with Arthur Merchant trying to impede him to accomplish the foul. Likewise Norris would hit a downed Donald Curry after crushing him with a left hook and right hand. The infamy of his lack of self-control embellished into two title fight farces by Luis Santana, who took the only way out of a beating at the fists of Norris he had open to him: on a stretcher. Such was the hot blood coursing though “Terrible” Terry. Beyond the personal foibles of losing while dominating, a prime Norris was essentially sublime against all of his opponents. Undetectable from his rhythmical combination hitting was his all-out power hitting. In full flow, Terry Norris’ punches jolted his intended targets like electrical discharges.

Though his list of ring victims remains susceptible to critical inquiry as either beyond their expiration dates or not in his class, that common point of contentiousness can be asserted to any number of champions and even some legends of the ring. We need not assign greatness to Norris, for excellence will do nicely. He was the consensus main man in the junior middleweight division for the better part of the 1990s; his body a pure hybrid of welterweight kinetics and middleweight strength. His mercurial domination of a division, for the better part of a decade, tells us something of his overall impact and quality. No less a champion than Pernell Whitaker essentially avoided meeting Norris in the ring; manager-trainer Lou Duva had let his welterweight champion Meldrick Taylor take a beating against Norris and quietly nixed putting his other superstar Whitaker in against Norris, at the height of his ring powers in 1992-93. One Felix Trinidad camp insider admitted, “Norris was the only fight back then Don Felix was worried about. That’s how high Norris’ rep was!”

Always physically fit to fight, Norris sometimes forgot to box. The retelling of his first round “domination” against then junior middleweight bomber Julian Jackson has become a tired cliché. For it was Norris’ second round knockout demise that instructed him in what would be his future ring significance and us in our historical reckoning of him. Being rendered inert, humbled in a world title fight rarely represents a turned corner toward the horizon line of possibility. But it was for Norris. Some fighters get up from knockdowns to win fights; Norris survived a knockout loss to go on to dominate his generation of junior middleweights.

His double left lead was such a searing punch. His ability to even think of landing a left hook, right hook, right uppercut combination showed his audacious ability. Even in close early rounds, Norris would throw an uppercut in situations most veteran fighters would throw a left hook. Able to hit on the counter going backwards or moving to collapse defensive postures, Norris’ “X” factor was his reflexive speed. Normally placid on the outside, Norris burned with momentary contempt for his opponents on the inside. In ring center, behind his jolting left lead, Norris was the counterpunching bomber boxer par excellence, a coiled spring of potential explosiveness forming combination hitting, which scored often at an astounding 45 to 50 percent of the time. Many trainers conceded privately that if Norris was content on the night to “just box you” there was almost nothing his opponents could do to beat him.

But Norris love the moment of decisive confrontation. He often couldn’t check himself. On December 18, 1993, former welterweight champion Simon Brown was being tattooed when he drew a cocky Terry Norris into a series of inside exchanges, eventually landing a show closing left hook on the champ. In their May 7, 1994 rematch Norris put on a master class of situational boxing, landing clusters of punches to a befuddled Simon Brown. Norris proved over those twelve sterling rounds of technical virtuosity in Las Vegas that his vulnerability to the home run punch was not the full measure of him as a championship fighter. Nor was the misrule of his unchecked ego.

He could repeat patterns of metronomic combinations, as he did against a 55-2-2 (34), in shape Jorge Castro over twelve one-sided rounds in France; or search out and destroy title holders like Maurice Blocker, John Mugabi, Steve Little, Carl Daniels, Vince Pettway and Donald Curry; or just blister opponents with a humbling spread of continuous fire like Paul Vaden or Quincy Taylor. His projected anger – except for Paul Vaden – was typically an “in the moment” determination to capitalize on his opportunity to compete and win. Trainers and ex-boxers loved to watch Terry Norris turn from boxer to puncher to boxer again, his technical facility adaptively seamless.

We look back now at Terry Norris believing he was perhaps less than the sum of his parts and yet we do so understanding how completely he assailed the fighters he faced. Championship boxers offer us a myriad of contradictory facets, when we take it upon ourselves to assess them in and beyond the statistical context of their time, the relational value of potential ever an agent for conjecture. With Terry Norris specific weaknesses defining vulnerability always balance against those dynamic skill sets giving evidence to a memorable capacity in a boxing ring. Even if his brilliant moments were mitigated, less than desire’s expectation, “Terrible” Terry Norris gave us minor masterpieces, his polished, uncoiling speed moving to his intended victim, one of the few embodied figurations of his generation we will remember, by heart.

add to Facebook add to Myspace add to Digg add to Mixx add to Linkedin add to Yahoo Buzz

Contact Patrick Kehoe @ TheSweetScience.com


hector rodrigueuz:  Oscar De La Hoya and Floyd Mayweather were the two biggest name in the sport of boxing when they met in May 5th. Why was that fight under so much pressure to save boxing? Any hardcore boxing fan should of known this was going to be a tactical fight instead of a more crowd pleasing brawl like Castillo vs Corrales or Gatti vs Ward. With more exciting fights coming up like Taylor vs Spinks, Castillo vs Hatton, and Cotto vs Judah to name a few, how come those fights are not promoted that much to bring out more fans to boxing?
Monday May 14, 2007 11:48:50 AM
Christopher M. Byrd:  Bernard Hopkins is the best middleweight in history. Yes, and this includes the fabulous Sugar Ray Robinson. His ability to adapt to any situation and boxing style is uncanny. He beats tricky southpaws as well as orthodox fighters with facility. I can see Bernard boxing circles around Sugar Ray Robinson in the same manner that Randy Turpin did. When Bernard first started his career, he dished out relentless punishment as the "Executioner". But he made a tangible metamorphosis and began to "execute" the sweet science. Bernard and Marco Antonio Barrera are the only fighters that I have seen that have gone from predators of the first degree to skilled boxers becused they realized the need for change to lengthen their careers. His mind games, mental toughness, and intelligent boxing skills separates him from all the others. He would outbox "Marvelous" Marvin Hagler because Marvin could not intimdate or fatigue Hopkins and Bernard would easily figure out his southpaw style. Sugar Ray Robinson did not have to fight tricky southpaws because the science of the times meant "drowning them at birth" by avoiding lefties at all costs. He did not have to fight skilled left-handed technicians like Pernell Whitaker, Hector Camacho, and Marvin Hagler. Also many of the fighters of the time (Basilio, Fulmer. Lamotta) were tailor made for his style because they were walk in sluggers. He struggled with a boxer like Randy Turpin, losing a decision and then trailing decisively in the rematch before knocking Turpin out. There has never been a boxer like Bernard who at 42 years of age fought at such a high level of skill against the best opponents.
Sunday Jul 22, 2007 09:44:33 AM
Christopher M. Byrd:  Bernard Hopkins is the best middleweight in history. Yes, and this includes the fabulous Sugar Ray Robinson. His ability to adapt to any situation and boxing style is uncanny. He beats tricky southpaws as well as orthodox fighters with facility. I can see Bernard boxing circles around Sugar Ray Robinson in the same manner that Randy Turpin did. When Bernard first started his career, he dished out relentless punishment as the "Executioner", but he made a tangible metamorphosis and began to "execute" the sweet science. Bernard and Marco Antonio Barrera are the only fighters that I have seen that have gone from predators of the first degree to skilled boxers because they realized the need for change to lengthen their careers. His mind games, mental toughness, and intelligent boxing skills separates him from all the others. He would outbox "Marvelous" Marvin Hagler because Marvin could not intimdate or fatigue Hopkins and Bernard would easily figure out his southpaw style. Sugar Ray Robinson did not have to fight tricky southpaws because the science of the times meant "drowning them at birth" by avoiding lefties at all costs. He did not have to fight skilled left-handed technicians like Pernell Whitaker, Hector Camacho, and Marvin Hagler. Also many of the fighters of the time (Basilio, Fulmer. Lamotta) were tailor made for his style because they were walk in sluggers. He struggled with a boxer like Randy Turpin, losing a decision and then trailing decisively in the rematch before knocking Turpin out. There has never been a boxer like Bernard who at 42 years of age fought at such a high level of skill against the best opponents.
Sunday Jul 22, 2007 10:21:03 AM
Kevin L. Moaney:  I think that Hagler is the best middleweight of all time.People have the tendency to forget some of the legends in there prime.If you took a Hagler in his prime and matched him against Hopkins in his prime,I think you would be surprised of the outcome.I think it would be boring for the first five rounds.Then I see Hagler dominating the rest of the fight.Maybe not knocking him out but battering him.I honestly don't think you can compare the two.Hagler fought legends,Hopkins fought big name fighters of his time.Hopkins beat De La Hoya,who is a very good BIG name fighter.But honestly, is he in the same league as a Ray Leonard in his prime?Arguebly the best welterweight of all time.Hagler lost a very close decision to him not because he was out fought ,but because he was out performed.Trinidad, who Hopkins stopped,was a knock out artist and devastating puncher.But can you compare him to Hearns in his prime?A scary one punch knockout artist that could box. People actually were scared for some of his opponents.The outcome with him and Hagler is historic.What man has Hopkins faced that was as tough and crafty as Ruberto Duran?What fighter has Hopkins beat that had knockout power in both hands like John "the beast " Mugabi?Hagler beat both.Hopkins is a very good fighter and a superstar of today.Hagler was a great fighter and one of the all time legends.Last but not least,does Hopkins hit hard enough to make Hagler respect him?I don't think so ,and going 15 rounds with a man that hits hard and takes a great punch would be brutal for Hopkins
Friday Aug 3, 2007 04:04:21 PM
Kevin L. Moaney:  How many people have witnessed Norris in his prime?Has there ever been a more complete fighter?He could dance(not run) and box his opponents.He could bomb with them,But like Hearns, he lacked that chin that seperate great fighters from legendary fighters.If he had fought Leonard in his prime,it would have been a classic.I see Leonard winning by sd, or late tko.That's only because Leonard would match him speed for speed and could take a great shot.I don't see Norris standing up to Leonards sharp punches and body attack for 15 rds.Put Norris in the ring with Mayweather,and Mayweather would get dominated.Why do you think that Chavez, Whitaker, Trinadad, and De La Hoya avoided him?Not only to avoid a loss, but also to avoid a beating.Ask Meldrick Taylor. Its a shame too.Cause with victories over those guys,Norris would have went down as one of the all time greats. A legend of the sport.
Friday Aug 29, 2008 01:59:41 AM
JOHN R HOLT:  Bernard Hopkins is the most overrated middleweight of all time. In his prime, Hopkins shared the division with Mike McCallum, Julian Jackson, Roy Jones, James Toney, Michael Nunn, Chris Eubank, Nigel Benn and other marquee fighters. Hopkins is the only one of the bunch who failed to beat any of his rivals. It wasn't until all the good middleweights moved up in weight for bigger challenges, did Hopkins take over the depleted division. Although a natural light heavyweight, Hopkins failed to defeat the only dominate middleweights he's faced, Roy Jones and Jermaine Taylor. Most of his rep is based on wins over much smaller welterweights, and domination of a division of C level fighters.
Wednesday Oct 15, 2008 12:33:03 AM
joe kent:  Mr bird, Bernard hopkins the best middleweight of all times? LOL. Mr. Holt, u hit it right on the nail. Terry Norris, the truth! Get well my friend.
Thursday Feb 5, 2009 04:42:24 PM
Arnold D.Mackey:  The best Middleweight ever was Carlos Monzon. I rate Sugar Ray Robinson right behind him!
Friday Feb 27, 2009 04:02:33 PM
joele:  i saw u on youtube and u kicked that guys butttt........ i like it.......... tell diamond i say hi from ...........
Sunday Mar 1, 2009 02:12:02 AM

Name: Email:  (will not be displayed, TSS Privacy, your email is required to autoapprove your comment)

Please be respectful, and do not use foul language in your comment

Discuss this article in the forum

  THESWEETSCIENCE.COM   More from the Top Team of Writers in the Fight Game ...
 
More from this Writer
Columns by Patrick Kehoe
 
Recent boxing Columns and News
•  Today We Will See How Ward Handles The Moment by Ron Borges
•  Hopkins Comes Full Circle And Gives Back by Frank Lotierzo
•  Andre Ward Vs. Mikkel Kessler On Saturday by David A. Avila
•  Pacquiao-Cotto Did 1.25 Million PPV Buys
•  PREDICTION PAGE: Dirrell Picks Ward, Taylor Hedges, Euros Go With Kessler
 
 


TSS Video
Freddie Roach talking about Amir Khan, Salita and Mayweather
  
Manny Pacquiao with Roach pt. 3
  
Miguel Cotto pt. 1
  
More Video
TSS Photo Archive

2009 Reader Of The Year Weighs In On Legacies Of Pacquiao And Mayweather
"Pacquiao has proven....in the ring... time and time again that he is the greatest of this time. He has earned his respect. He begs for nothing. He is a man content with his growth, his family and his achievements. A man the world has now turned it's eyes to behold. Floyd Mayweather is not even close in stature. He may possess the greatest skills but he is not the Face of Boxing today. Google Manny Pacquiao. There are 20 million searches. Google Floyd. There are 6.5 million. Look at the NYTimes, the Wall Street Journal and Time. Count how many words were used these past years to mention Floyd Mayweather. Then count the words still being printed about Manny. And keep counting. As I've said many times, Floyd has been too clever by half. He has short changed his public.....and has out-smarted himself. Manny will fight but a few more times. Enjoy it while you can. He is an all time great pugilist. Floyd, with all of his remarkable skills lack the will to be truly great in the biggest sense of the word. His legacy will look more like Holmes that Ali. He has earned it." ---November is half-way gone, but we don't need to keep counting ballots. It's a landslide. Fe'Roz has won the 2009 Reader of the Year award. His comments add to the website immeasurably, and he epitomizes the thoughtful, respectful, educated fan of pugilism we strive to cater to at TSS. Congrats, Fe'Roz, and please accept my thanks for being the valued member of this community that you are. Sincerely, Editor Mike

Round by Round Coverage
Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto
Fight aficionados, tune in for live, round by round coverage of the Manny Pacquiao v. Miguel Cotto welterweight championship on Saturday, November 14th beginning at 9 pm ET / 6 pm PT.

The Sweet Science Writers
The Sweet Science
Legal  | Privacy  |  Sitemap  |  Disclaimer  |  The Savage Science © 2004-2007 The Sweet Science Boxing.  All rights reserved. .